Vote Lawrence Webb for London mayor!

Lawrence Webb for London

Lawrence Webb, a former UKIP London Chairman, is our candidate for the London Mayoral elections in May.

Work now starts on building a campaign that will offer Londoners a fresh choice when it comes to electing a representative that understands what really matters to those that live and work in the capital.

Lawrence will campaign on a number of issues that matter to real Londoners.

These include:

Tackling the lack of law and order in London which was clearly demonstrated by the recent riots.
Gaining a tighter grip on immigration to ensure that Londoners are put first when it comes to jobs and housing.
Halting the burden of EU legislation threatening the City of London and its place as one of the world’s greatest global financial capitals.
Restricting the extension of the Low Emission Zone which will have a detrimental effect on thousands of small businesses across the capital unless they upgrade or change their vehicles.
After the result was announced, Mr Webb said: “I am delighted to have won the nomination to be UKIP’s Mayoral candidate for the 2012 London Elections, and would like to thank all those who voted for me.

“I can now get on with the task of setting out UKIP’s vision for London, which I believe will resonate with the ordinary folk in London. I believe that Londoners are crying out for change especially in light of the recent riots and the less that helpful comments of both Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone. With the ongoing Euro debt crisis and the negative impact of EU legislation on London jobs there has never been a better time for UKIP and I look forward to achieving real success in London in 2012.”

UKIP Leader Nigel Farage says: “Lawrence will be an excellent mayoral candidate for UKIP. After years flying the flag for the Party in London he knows the city and its hopes and fears intimately.

“I am delighted to be able to support him and call on the party in London to get behind his campaign.

It’s difficult to see how he can do much,if any,of that without getting the Party into national government first.If he really wants to rattle the cage of the low emmission tax zone and immigration and all the other loony London policies supporters,he could probably do a lot worse than to promise the transfer,of the outer London boroughs, back to where they rightfully belong in the counties that they were taken from,while there’s still an indigenous population left in them.Although that would be a bit difficult in the case of those London boroughs that formed Middx.

However what do they mean by ‘restricting (further :question: ) extension’ of the low emmission zone when it already covers all of the existing GLA area up to it’s borders :question: . :confused:

On housing the fact is the place is already full of tower blocks and houses (that’s why it’s already an overdeveloped zb hole where no one with any sense wants to live so anyway) so where the zb do they intend to put even more and who the zb would want to live there if they somehow did find somewhere to build even more :question: . :confused: Ironically they’d just be adding to the attraction of the place to yet more immigrants if they do that.

Luckily for me I live on the right side of the Surrey/London border and if the zb’s move their border further out,by taking more of the place,to house more of their population,then that’ll be the time to move. :smiling_imp: :bulb: :laughing:

i don’t think a single mayor has any power to stop EU legislation.
the house of commons, and the house of lords combined can’t do jack [zb] about it.
each party has people in Brussels, and they can’t stop it.
We are an island surrounded by the ocean, and that can’t stop it.
so, who is this super hero?
is it a bird?
is it a plane?
NO.
it’s, just another political ■■■.
the tanker drivers have more power at the moment. :laughing:

limeyphil:
i don’t think a single mayor has any power to stop EU legislation.
the house of commons, and the house of lords combined can’t do jack [zb] about it.
each party has people in Brussels, and they can’t stop it.
We are an island surrounded by the ocean, and that can’t stop it.
so, who is this super hero?
is it a bird?
is it a plane?
NO.
it’s, just another political ■■■.
the tanker drivers have more power at the moment. :laughing:

We can stop EU legislation by leaving the EU which is what UKIP is (rightly) all about. :bulb:

The tanker drivers ‘would’ have more power if the army were to say that they’d refuse to cross their picket lines. :open_mouth: :smiling_imp: :laughing:

Promises, promises… :unamused:

He’d be getting my vote if I were in London

Carryfast’s first post made quite a bit of sense until he spoiled it by replying again.

For me they should stockade London like they did Berlin, keep all the loony parties inside and they can argue over what happens to the local duckpond.

The American, French, Russian, and British sector would than become, Black, Polish, Cockney and Other

Wheel Nut:
Carryfast’s first post made quite a bit of sense until he spoiled it by replying again.

For me they should stockade London like they did Berlin, keep all the loony parties inside and they can argue over what happens to the local duckpond.

The American, French, Russian, and British sector would than become, Black, Polish, Cockney and Other

What makes you think it isn’t that way already? I know pubs that are set up that way! :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Heard the two candidate debates on lbc today. Ukip and bnp want to get rid of the lez. That stupid bint from the greens wants to up the congestion charge to £40 a day for “gas guzzlers” which I guess would include hgvs. Don’t think the Chelsea tractor brigade will vote her in

Happydaze:

Wheel Nut:
Carryfast’s first post made quite a bit of sense until he spoiled it by replying again.

For me they should stockade London like they did Berlin, keep all the loony parties inside and they can argue over what happens to the local duckpond.

The American, French, Russian, and British sector would than become, Black, Polish, Cockney and Other

What makes you think it isn’t that way already? I know pubs that are set up that way! :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

That’s what I’ve been saying about the difference between multiculturalism and integration.But it’s all a bit more complicated than that.

The indigenous Essex,Kentish,Surrey,Middx and Herts are never going to be cockneys and wouldn’t want to live within the sound of bow bells.

The Cockneys have mostly all moved out of east london and moved to Essex.

The indigenous Middx all moved out when the Asians moved in and renamed it the Indian colonial states of West London.

But the Hindus don’t mix with the Muslims.

The indigenous Surrey population,at least the ones with any sense,moved further out into what’s left of Surrey as the Londoners of whatever type,many of them Africans and Asians,moved in and took over and then called those parts of it South and South West London.

As for the situation in Kent,sorry those parts which are now South East London,and Herts,sorry those parts which are now North London,no one is sure yet although some say their indigenous populations followed the example of the population of Surrey,oops those parts which are now South West London,when they saw what had happened to Middx. :open_mouth: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Yes it’s very sad what has happened to London and most Cities in England, im truly a foreigner in my own country when down there.

The Scottish angle on multicultralism is most concerning at the moment as one of the biggest advocates of multicultralism is Alex Sammond, so much so that his nickname amongst tory mps is Abdul, which is mainly do to his pro immigrant voting record in parliment. The muppets that vote snp don’t realise there true multicultral agenda.

An snp Scotland = Bradford!!! :bulb: Sadly not joking. :cry: