Viewnt cv

suedehead · 15 March 2014 21:11

Probably in the wrong thread but here goes.Pulled up behind one of the above today,never seen one before.
Lickle car with chrome bumpers on an E plate(66 vintage) . . any ideas of the manufacturer?

m_amp_c_steve · 16 March 2014 02:42

A pic would greatly assist in trying to identify whatever it may be…

suedehead · 16 March 2014 08:56

Sorry no pic but the full reg no was FST 377E .Is there a way of identifying it from that?
Only saw the rear and it looked a bit like a Fiat 500 but bigger.

lawrence_dunbar · 16 March 2014 17:50

Suedehead:
Sorry no pic but the full reg no was FST 377E .Is there a way of identifying it from that?
Only saw the rear and it looked a bit like a Fiat 500 but bigger.

Its a MITSUOKA 5 Door Hatchback Reg, Inverness, Regards Larry.

thelongdrag · 16 March 2014 20:24

Lawrence Dunbar:

Suedehead:
Sorry no pic but the full reg no was FST 377E .Is there a way of identifying it from that?
Only saw the rear and it looked a bit like a Fiat 500 but bigger.

Its a MITSUOKA 5 Door Hatchback Reg, Inverness, Regards Larry.

Yes as Lawrence says a Mitsuoka, type it in to Wiki all the info on there and pic’s. Mike.

lawrence_dunbar · 16 March 2014 20:26

Lawrence Dunbar:

Suedehead:
Sorry no pic but the full reg no was FST 377E .Is there a way of identifying it from that?
Only saw the rear and it looked a bit like a Fiat 500 but bigger.

Its a MITSUOKA 5 Door Hatchback Reg, Inverness, Regards Larry.

I forgot to mention the E Reg would have been January till then end of July then the 1st of August the F regs started as far as I can remember Regards Larry.

suedehead · 16 March 2014 21:14

Lawrence Dunbar:

Suedehead:
Sorry no pic but the full reg no was FST 377E .Is there a way of identifying it from that?
Only saw the rear and it looked a bit like a Fiat 500 but bigger.

Its a MITSUOKA 5 Door Hatchback Reg, Inverness, Regards Larry.

Cheers for that Larry, never seen one before and probably wont see one again.
Caught my eye and looked in good nick for a +40 years old car.
Cant be many still about?

stanfield · 16 March 2014 21:46

Here you go is this the one

And another (F reg 67/68) from the rear.

tipper_tom · 16 March 2014 21:58

They are modern cars on a non age related (personalised) number plate.

They are based on a Nissan Micra K11.

I evidence this by the fact that a car of that age wouldn’t have a fog light. Nor would it have those god awful plastic mirrors with the chrome effect backing.

Also we have a customer at my garage who has one and it’s on a 2001 Y reg