bigr250:
Gogan, I make no appology for being, & am quite happy to pronounce myself “old school” at the age of 55!! But to describe everyone who doesn’t like modern high tech trucks as “Jimmy with a shifting spanner” is just as plain wrong as suggesting none of us understand remapping & areodynamics etc, I have a very modern, extensive & up to date tool kit which includes two ‘shifters’ & a multi meter.
Sorry Ross, I did not mean to cause offence to anyone. However, I do think my generalisation (or stereotype if you want to be politically incorrect) is broadly fair, as I think it would apply to the vast majority of your generation. I do accept there are exceptions however.
bigr250:
We’ve sent trucks to a local main dealer for a ‘wiz kid’ to plug his Xbox into to tell us that there were no faults recorded on a truck that was so far down on power that it dropped 3 gears to get out of the Mersey Tunnel empty!! This 22 year old bloke had virtually no idea of the inner workings of an internal combustion engine, in other words, if it wasn’t on his lap top screen, there was nothing wrong!!
The “wiz kid” with the gelled hair is just as ignorant as Jimmy and his shifting spanner. Main dealers are full of these monkeys whose only diagnostic skills involve reading fault codes from a laptop, but that is only a tiny part of the diagnostic process. The various control systems are far more complex than the trucks monitoring systems (which are largely based on hardware polling and are purely reactive to parameter values) can ever hope to cover. You need to have a genuine knowledge of electronics in order to perfrom a decent diagnosis, and an ability to both use and interpret an ocilloscope is a farly rigid requirement in order to do the job properly. Sadly that is missing from the average delaer-trained “technician”, who can’t really claim to be able to use a laptop any more than he can a torque wrench!
bigr250:
Automated manual gearbox’s, do you really think that they are the ‘way forward’■■ The only one I’ve driven that behaves anything like I’d want is our 05 Volvo ishift, we also have ZF auto’s in both 12 & 16 speed and both are rubbish, we maintain some Scania 3 pedal auto’s and they’re no better than the ZF though I’m told the ‘2 pedal’ version is much better. To me these box’s are simply more to go wrong, & go wrong in a very expensive way so enormous pain (when they go wrong) against virtually no gain when they dont.
Yes, I genuinely do believe they are the way forward. I think your opinion that the boxes provide no gain is clearly based on your viewpoint as a driver and/or mechanic. As an operator, they have numerous advantages - clutch life is doubled (or more), the box is mechanically simpler (no synchros to fail), it is lighter as a result, will last longer between overhauls and most importantly can improve the fuel consumption of the less capable drivers on the payroll (A good driver can usually beat the computer, but good drivers are like hens teeth, less capable ones are ten a penny). The only disadvantages are the very slightly more complex control systems, but even these are largely reliable and only rarely go wrong - and certainly no more often than the air valves, rods and cables of a fully manual transmission in my experience.