Oh yes my legs were aching.
I do like,to exercise,I like,the mountains, ahhh the cold air.
I like to keep fit so that when I get chased by the police ,I can get away.
Can you still feel your legs, LOL
Oh and the reason you can’t go to a tribunal is because, yes you guessed it,your off to the magistrates,
Had your dna taken yet.
1 trucker got done for a ■■■■ 10years ago when they took his dna for infringement
,I here there going go start taking DNA from all those bottles of ■■■■ that litter the roads.
I’m sorry but I’ve seen it,all.
Talk about life changing opportunity.
That’s what holds Britain together isn’t it
How everybody sticks together.
I was new to this site.
The reason for my little visit was to gauge the feeling on the working time regulations and working time2005
I seem to have different interpretation of what are periods of availability.
The feedback on this site is one of mostly disregard for the regulations.
It appears that members make there own interpretation to suit the individual.
The conclusion is that members don’t value the regulation and do so as they wish.
I suppose nobody gives it much thought.
Its like the other guy said your all just steering wheel attendants.
Hanging around is alright
HR Today July 2011 - Intellect Technology Association www.intellectuk.org › HR TodayJul 20, 2011 — Lack of clarity in policies - Liberty Living plc v Mr Allan Reid … on site is classed as working time - Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd This case concerns an HGV driver,Peter Ross, who was …
Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd - People Management Magazine Online www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/…/ross-v- …Jun 17, 2011 — Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd. Most UK employees’ hours and breaks and so on are governed by the …
Keep on trucking | New Law Journal www.newlawjournal.co.uk/…/keep- …Jun 17, 2011 — In Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd [2011] EAT/0085/10, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has had to …
like i said i have read all those what happened at the new hearing
His claim for unfair dismissal was therefore sent back for a re-hearing
so what happened when it was re heard or as it not yet been heard
so as your appeal was on
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
At the Tribunal
On 14 January 2011
Judgment handed down on 16 May 2011
So from the 16 th of may 2011 till now as there been a new hearing , becouse if there as not then why have you taken this long to talk about this. if there as been one what happen at that hearing and can you show a link to it .
when was the new hearing and what happend there
Case lost.
No grounds.
Whichever bunch of crack smoking crazy heads decided it was safe for a driver to do 3x 15hr shifts a week and 3 reduced rest periods needs their head kicking in with steel toe cap boots, I can do it sure, but by god your hanging out your scrotum at the end of it…that is not safe on any level IMHO.
It appears from the numerous mentioned links that the reason a driver was so far in hock with the working time was that he was spending so much time either doing vehicle checks, or waiting for the canteen to open. Now there is nothing wrong with driving a safe lorry but if an industry standard of 15 minutes has sort of been unofficially agreed. It actually takes about 5 minutes even if changing trailers.
ross v stobart has been very vocal in the past 36 hours yet it is over 2 years since this case was in court. Get over it, go to Wonga and borrow the 10k it cost you to feed your kids and keep your head down at your next employer.
Rearrange the following letters
L T R L O
It takes years to,sort out court cases.
You know the reason I don’t get fired is because i’m good st my job.
Good driver, good timekeeping.never of sick. No customer complaints.
But you plebs are right.
You have to sniff ■■■ to keep your job.
Seems like a lot of you guys have brown noses and you will do anything.g to keep your job.
Even breaking the law…
I’m up for that.
I reckon society deserves nothing less than drivers having a free for all.
Well lets all join,in and ■■■■ the
Lets have a free for all bonanza.
Lets loot,and pillage.
Lehman as much as you can carry
Was it the employer who said to the driver that their average RTD hours were too much and therefore must take time off ?
Or was it the driver who pointed out the hours to the employer?
In either case, why were they so concerned about it?
ROG:
Was it the employer who said to the driver that their average RTD hours were too much and therefore must take time off ?Or was it the driver who pointed out the hours to the employer?
In either case, why were they so concerned about it?
Rog the company are a very public one as we all know, there are required to follow the RTD by law, just because no one in the Vosa police’s it does not mean that there won’t, ever company has a legal responsibility to keep working time recorded for two years and there doing that. so there keeping with in the law.
One day a company will get done for RTD failings, and when and if it happens as look as a company can prove there following it then the law will and usually does come down on the driver.
At the new hearing I lost.
There is no other hearing
It didn’t matter the laws were broken it was irrelevant
Ignorance is a good defence.
I have to pay thousands in costs,
Oh well never mind.
I fight the law and the Law won
Best eat that humble pie.
I lost on all counts.
The employer won on all counts.
The employer was amazing.
They did nothing .
It was all my fault.
I was to blame.
Now I have to pay thousands in court costs for wasting everybodys time.
Guilty as charged.
Ha ha ha.
An employment tribunal is not allowed to consider evidence under the BHS ruling so all they can do is to accertain whether or not the correct procedures have been used by the company or the employee
I pointed that my hours were high.they didn’t care until it was to late.
I offered to go home on no pay.
No pay.
They refused and made me wait for there,days.
Until this happened I had a clean record.
No warnings or anything.
When I pointed out that I will call,vosa, within days I was accused of all Manet of things.
But no dp warnings or anything.
You set until this issue all was great.
After it happened then that’s when the complaints flooded in.
That’s a fair process isn’t it.
Ha ha Ga Ga.
You set its not, straight,as it seems.
I was right,
I was
Oh yes I was
Phantom Mark:
Whichever bunch of crack smoking crazy heads decided it was safe for a driver to do 3x 15hr shifts a week and 3 reduced rest periods needs their head kicking in with steel toe cap boots, I can do it sure, but by god your hanging out your scrotum at the end of it…that is not safe on any level IMHO.
.
I like this post.
This man has common sense
I bet lose nut ,I mean head but,sorry I mean wheels lose but head.
That other guy,what’s his name wheel,lose nut.
He is a but wierd.
Quite .
Obviously a Who loves driving, must be cab happy.
Bet he poops in the bushes and,ewers I
Ive sussed out how not to bresk the law.
What you do is fiddle your hours and it will be no problem, hey hozey.
Ive decided to record,work time correctky apart from fridays when ill record rest all day.
That,will reduce my hours by arround 10hours, and should keep me looking legal.
Now had I done that at mylast employment there would have been no problem.
Ahh at last a solution.
Question, does anybody know if its an offence to run like the clappers when you get,a pull if vosa.
Also does,anybody know anyone who wants to sell a dodgy driver card.
I can pay 50,00 pounds for one
Thanks
Are all your toys out of the pram now? I don’t think many people are that bothered with your obsession, most of the posts on this page are from you…
It sounds like you didn’t know when to quit and it’s bitten you on the backside.