THEY maybe asked HIS advice.
1 Like
It doesn’t need me to “discredit” him.
If thousands, upon thousands, of Drs disagree with him, then that is good enough for me.
If he has evidence to support his views…where is it?
Publish it. Get it peer reviewed by those who know about these things.
Al Gore and Prince Charles are scientific experts?
But so far as Al Gore’s warning went?
What did he actually say? As opposed to what he alleged to have said? Ignore the (■■■■■■■ again!) straw men being set up.
And how wrong was he in what he actually said? (Again) Not what it is alleged he said?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54508-3
Still could happen.
Any “narrative driven” explanations about how huge contracts are being signed to provide unknown services, for unknown needs, for undecided, ID systems?
1 Like
If there is YOU will sure as hell refute them .
Stop being obtuse. You knew perfectly well what was meant
1 Like
Yes.. I know what was meant.
I saw misrepresentation and spin. And that is being polite.
So what about the meat of the argument? Did Al Gore say anything drastically wrong?
No.
And note the banner at the top: no further funding
I wonder how @maoster and @robroy will respond to that?
Is it wicked Gov covering up unhelpful truths? Yea…but… it is Trump in charge now…
So why doesn’t he show expanding ice fields? Ohh…
Solution! No funding because… satellites are imaginary… because the Earth is really flat!
You saw exactly what you wanted to see. No more, no less.
1 Like
I saw what was written.
I saw that, and showed what was really said at the time.
Interpret that your own way if you want.
Give us your “alternative facts” if you like.
There are lots and lots of alternatives to the facts out there. Take your pick.
I wish that I was a salesman living near you, I’d be long retired now of course. That’s purely because I’d know by that couching anything a certain way that you’d definitely buy it.
1 Like
If thousands, upon thousands, of Drs disagree with him.
If ffs 
if your auntie had balls she would be your uncle.
1 Like
I’d like to think they were smart enough to follow a 50 - 100 year resource management solution, but given Starmer and his ilk are dumber than a sack of rocks I doubt it.
Some people have said the same thing about Maggie cutting the coal industry to pieces so the UK’s coal is conserved while the rest of the world’s is used inside, I’m not buying that one either since coal mining is a generational, perishable-skillset that takes a long time to recover and is lost quickly.
Many thousands of Drs have given many millions of mRNA vaccines since he made that video. Millions upon millions of vaccines.
What he predicted would happen, has not happened.
±±±+
For those who poo-poo me as some sort of self
appointed expert, and say I should look at what an actual qualified Dr says:
I claim no expertise. I repeat and point out what experts say.
I point out what experts in the field of mRNA say. I wonder why they do not shout at this and a small number of other Drs why they do not listen to the vast majority of their colleagues who have been successfully giving mRNA vaccines for years now.
They shout “listen to this guy, he is an expert.” Simultaneously they shout “he is a hero because he does not listen to experts”!
The video in question, predicting all this death and destruction?
Note the date. And that is no guarantee that it was new even then, just when it was uploaded to that site.
I’ve said it a few times on here, you can blame Bo-Jo for this. The Tories signed us up to the ‘decarbonisation of the UK economy & road transport bill’ in 2020/1 to move from a high carbon power generation to a clean renewable energy generation one.
We follow the EU on emission standards but we have our own UK emissions standards bill which is stricter than the European one, The European emissions standard is 55% lower emissions by 2030, The UK’s is 68% lower emissions standards by 2030.
Yes, but what about Khan and his London ULEZ scheme?
Planned by Johnson when he was London Mayor, 2015. Johnson’s plans carried through and the scheme started when Khan was Mayor, 2019.
1 Like
sorry wrong again the legislation that commits us to this crap was the climate change act in 2008 when labour were in
Why do you always turn stuff into a Tory v Labour stand off with an apologist stance towards the left?
Nobody disputes the Tories were crap,.signified by an enormous swing to a shower of assorted inept clowns who would have got nowhere near no 10 any other time…people were sick of the Tories.
You come out with your derisory ‘Not as bad as the Tories’ b/s, …..you could spend the entire day providing your ‘‘proof’’ by numerous tedious links, the plain truth to anybody (who ain’t blinkered) is they ARE as bad, and when you consider you are comparing 14 months or so with 14 years to get as bad as they are they could be considered worse.
So the synopsis of it all as I keep trying to tell you, is it does not matter how much blind alliegance you have or don’t have towards certain parties, the fact is all politicians are the same….but good or crap in different ways.
So ffs bore off with your ‘‘Tories are the devil’s incarnate and Labour can do no wrong’’.
1 Like
I stand corrected. 
“The Conservative government, under Prime Minister Theresa May, signed the decarbonisation of the UK into law by passing the Climate Change Act, which includes a legally binding target to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. This act was first introduced in 2008 and updated in 2019 to include the net zero target.”
is that the same act that was passed in 2008
Writing something in capital letters does not make it TRUE
If you want to convince others that the current gov is equally bad as the previous ones, then provide evidence to support your case, don’t just SHOUT.
Until it is shown that Starmer has ditched security so he get pissed with KGB operatives, until it is shown that he has lied to Parliament, lied to the monarch, broken laws that he made, then I will be of the opinion that Johnson is a worse PM.
That does mean I believe Starmer is great, nor that the current gov is doing everything well. They aren’t.
But they are not as bad as the Tories.