Chas:
B1 GGK:
Easter-Star:
The biggest amount of failures will be new start up concerns who have failed to do their figures correctly , most will fail in the first year. Sad but true.But on the other hand, if you can start up and maintain a business in the current climate things are promising for when the climate turns to good.
It is often said that the best time to start a business is during a recession, I disagree.
The best time to start a business will always be ASAP.
It’s true that if a business can survive being started during a recession, when times get better it will thrive.
But a business can just as easily fail by being too successful !
I’ll give you some cause for thought : Harry Monk buys a lorry & starts out on his own account, he’s so damned good at the job that within 5yrs Harry Monk has 35 lorries on the road. Harry Monk’s sat his desk with an intray that touches the ceiling of his posh office, 5 lines on hold & 2x secretaries to do his typing !
Is Harry Monk a good truck driver or is Harry Monk a good accountant?
All Harry ever wanted to do, was to drive a truck & not drive it for an [zb]. Nowadays, Harry cannot possibly spare the time to get behind a wheel, he has to meet with the bank manager at 9, the tax man at 11, there’s 5 people waiting in reception & still, that intray reaches the ceiling !
If you are on your own, then being able to earn a fortune this way has got to be the tastiest it can be.
Don’t we dream of clearing £2k+ per week running our own tractors up and down the country pulling someone else’s trailer wherever?
Once you start expanding (Why bother?) then you’ve got all that executive stress described, and also that niggling thought that most of your takehome pay NOW comes at the expense of under-paying your staff… Employers who don’t underpay their staff after all, lose money. Larger firms also mean more shrinkage to the bottom line because you’ll not know 35 as well as you’ll know yourself and a couple of relatives/mates.
Then comes the additional risks related to recessions, which are a cyclical thing. You want your business to last for life, or at least so you can flog it and retire when the time is right. Running a firm that consists of you on your own with your girl answering the phone & doing the office bits means only having to find work for one person, but actually employs two. Expand to 35 trucks, then you’re looking at anywhere from 40-120 staff, assuming you’re going to have the wheels turning 24/7 and all. This is going to require not only a steady stream of MUCH higher work “intray” as you put it, but it has to be sustained at all times - especially during a recession when you’ve otherwise got the choice of lay offs, short hours, or taking a hit for as long as the recession lasts, and paying everyone full pay still. This has GOT to be harder for a larger firm than a small one - recessions just represent the tide going out. Small firms represent how many staff can keep themselves decent when there’s only a half dozen pairs of trunks to go around, a bit like that Buffet analogy.
A good idea for the business of the future is one that can properly organise work required by the worker, rather than by an industry that has its highs and lows. If I sign up for an agency for instance, they don’t give a hoot if I can program/repair a computer, assist on scientific projects including archaeological digs & laboratories, or even run a retail outlet - they just want to know if I’ll go somewhere and drive for them. The agency is tailored for the premises client, rather than the WORKER who should be their FIRST client!
…"The economics of the future NEED to be "somewhat different"…