Let’s look at this from a “financial risk” angle for a moment:
You can trash your own personal household economy rather than take this 13% chance of dying from a disease, assuming you even catch it to start with…
That’s 100% chance of trashing your own economy by choice then - because you either chose not to take the chance, or were forced to not take the chance by our illustrious establishment right now.
Alternatively, we could have had no lock-down whatsoever, and let this disease run it’s course on a “pot luck” basis to which 13% of 50% likely to be exposed to it sooner or later - come to likely just another routine “natural causes” death at the end of the day…
It is a shame that there are no statistics that provide any answers to this following question:
Of people EACH age 1 though 90 - Divide up the manner of death down into what goes on the death certificate, where “Coronavirus” is job-lotted with all the other “respiritorial” forms of demise.
You disregard the data for “Under 1” and “over 90” because to get a proper measure - you ingore the high and low figures when collating data as “abberations”.
If you didn’t do thus, you’d be including all abortions and cot deaths as “deaths for the under 1 years old” category for instance…
Likewise, if you included the over 90 bracket, then the figure would be grossly distorted by the fact that statistically only around 1 in 1000 people live to MAKE it to such a ripe old age - before we even start.
Doesn’t anyone ANYWHERE seem just the teensy weensy bit suspicious meanwhile that
“So and so famous person tested positive for coronavirus” of which the PM is one of many…
and yet not ONE such PRE-diagnosed famous person - died from such an “up-front” diagnosis that we’re reading of in the media…
Where’s this 13% from those then■■?
Where’s “Celebrity self-isolating having declared 2 weeks ago - now having an open-coffined funeral, before being observed going through the crematorium curtains” hmm?
At the other end of the scale, we keep on hearing about “so and so person dies with Coronavirus” when they were NOT declared to have had it, and had gone home, waiting to die from it" beforehand.
Only after their deaths (which I’m not disputing are very real) - do we get to hear about it, meaning that how many countless thousands of people have come into contact with them during that “incubation period” when they didn’t even know they had it themselves, but the wider public didn’t know that they too are now running their own incubation periods because they were not informed of their exposure to infected persons?
Such public over-exposure - may (for all I know) have led to the vast majority of these daily deaths purely thanks to this scandalous handling of simple “Information Flow” over this entire crisis?
Thus, like most “Hoaxes” - the conspiracy against the wider public is that we don’t get the information we need to save the maximum number of lives, i.e. EVERYONE from things far more wider in scope than a mere medical issue…
There’s no serious effort being made to create a “vaccine”, because don’t you think it would be on some government’s contingency already if there had been?
Wouldn’t it have been better to use Martial Law rather than send our police on fool’s errands to round up dog walkers and beach strollers too, whilst heaving “infrastructure” upheaval now bristles with a black market boom, and crime wave tsunami to come that’ll complete the destruction of ALL our communities, starting with the largest first…?
We’re in month what? - Five or Six of 42 - by the end of which, 25% of us will be gone.
WHICH 25% though?
That’s for us decide on our own level.
I don’t want someone else choosing for me, which is why I reckon the economy should have been left alone from Lockdown, instead of handing it over to our criminal underworlds to manage for the forseeable future.
During the 1930’s depression years - many “Local businesses” were being run by Gangsters.
Why should it be any difference in this slump?
The gangsters are going to be rather more in number this time around, because the world’s population is that much higher than the 1930’s.
The only “Gangster Markets” that won’t be helped by this particular crisis and lock-down - are Prostitution and the People Trafficing “industries” if you will.
On the other hand, Narcotics, Money Laundering, “Domestic Crime” and “casual violence” will thrive in this new environment where our police cells don’t actually have an criminals in them. 
Even those people laughing and scoffing at types like me - might want to tread carefully with their currently cushy lifestyles - once the utilities start failing, food and drink supplies start turning up “tainted”, and our pets start going missing - assuming all of the above have not commenced somewhere by this point on a small scale underneath the mainstream media’s radar…
“Ending the Lockdown” might now be an even harder thing for ANY government of this country to bring about than Brexit!!!
