smee it was a joke you know one of those things you laugh at, he was on about being two minutes over and i had a bit of laugh because 2 minites is not going to get him hung is it…we all laugh were i work makes the day go by
2 minutes … would have to look very hard on a check, but would not even be note worthy, common sense does actually come into play. so long as a valid reason is recorded on the rear of the disk / print cannot think of anyone that would do anything than an advisory chat and that would be for something more noticeable than 2 minutes.
vosaguy:
2 minutes … would have to look very hard on a check, but would not even be note worthy, common sense does actually come into play. so long as a valid reason is recorded on the rear of the disk / print cannot think of anyone that would do anything than an advisory chat and that would be for something more noticeable than 2 minutes.
Hi vosaguy, WELCOME. 
vosaguy:
2 minutes … would have to look very hard on a check, but would not even be note worthy, common sense does actually come into play. so long as a valid reason is recorded on the rear of the disk / print cannot think of anyone that would do anything than an advisory chat and that would be for something more noticeable than 2 minutes.
If you would like the post I put in about being over 2 mins
yes READ IT
I was infact 2 mins UNDER THE 6 HR WTD THATS WHAT I ARGUED ABOUT WITH THE BOSS
THE TACH INFRINGMENT WAS INCORRECT GET IT RIGHT
nick2008:
vosaguy:
2 minutes … would have to look very hard on a check, but would not even be note worthy, common sense does actually come into play. so long as a valid reason is recorded on the rear of the disk / print cannot think of anyone that would do anything than an advisory chat and that would be for something more noticeable than 2 minutes.If you would like the post I put in about being over 2 mins
yes READ IT
I was infact 2 mins UNDER THE 6 HR WTD THATS WHAT I ARGUED ABOUT WITH THE BOSS
THE TACH INFRINGMENT WAS INCORRECT GET IT RIGHT
seems a bit touchy nick !! if you read my post, i think you will see that i have not even quoted yours – or anyone elses — or can you see something else ?
have a nice day anyway !!
Hi vosaguy, WELCOME.
[/quote]
Thanks Dave !!
vosaguy:
nick2008:
vosaguy:
2 minutes … would have to look very hard on a check, but would not even be note worthy, common sense does actually come into play. so long as a valid reason is recorded on the rear of the disk / print cannot think of anyone that would do anything than an advisory chat and that would be for something more noticeable than 2 minutes.If you would like the post I put in about being over 2 mins
yes READ IT
I was infact 2 mins UNDER THE 6 HR WTD THATS WHAT I ARGUED ABOUT WITH THE BOSS
THE TACH INFRINGMENT WAS INCORRECT GET IT RIGHTseems a bit touchy nick !! if you read my post, i think you will see that i have not even quoted yours – or anyone elses — or can you see something else ?
have a nice day anyway !!
Just stating the fact you quoted 2 mins and as far as i can see I was the only person to state i was questioned being 2 mins over the WTD and the answers flowed from that reg the 2 min maybe i read it wrong but how come you use the 2 min wtd ■■?