Summary
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
A jumbled phrase of indeterminate meaning.
Was a phrase that made up part of a post on /v/.
Every subsequent post was either someone trying to decipher the phrase or reposting it with a clever picture.
It is often used to show confusion or to make fun of another poster who is having trouble communicating effectively.
It was/is mostly prevalent on YouTube and 4chan, where it originated.
green456:
toby1234abc:
The necklace refers to a burning tyre placed on the neck of the camera to burn the evidence.Melt the photo?how does that work with a digital camera then
they are all digital you know
it sends the pic to DVLA as soon as it takes it.
have you ever seen anyone from prontoprint going around replacing films in speed cameras
Depends on the camera. Specs are digital but they only record the reg number. Gatsos have a roll of film which can take 400 pictures so effectively they can prosecute 200 drivers per roll. Yes I have seen them on several occasions changing the film. The camera slides down the pole on a sort of winch system so they can change it.
None send the pic to dvla. The digital ones send it to the local camera partnership who then use the pnc to find keepers details etc.
Used that defence a few years ago. Asked for photo, as it could have been me or my wife - photo turned up and still couldn’t tell which of us it was. Wrote a letter along the lines of “It was definitely one of us, either of us is willing to take the blame, but we are worried that if one of us admits it without being positive it WAS us then we will be committing perjury and open to prosecution. Could you advise us which one of us should commit perjury please?” Never heard anything else 
Not saying it would work now though…
If it was a Scab in a van i’d ask to see the calibration certificate for that day as they are required to calibrate the device every time/day they use it. AND THEY DONT ALLWAYS!!! 
Akuji:
green456:
toby1234abc:
The necklace refers to a burning tyre placed on the neck of the camera to burn the evidence.Melt the photo?how does that work with a digital camera then
it sends the pic to DVLA as soon as it takes it.
have you ever seen anyone from prontoprint going around replacing films in speed camerasDepends on the camera. Specs are digital but they only record the reg number. Gatsos have a roll of film which can take 400 pictures so effectively they can prosecute 200 drivers per roll. Yes I have seen them on several occasions changing the film. The camera slides down the pole on a sort of winch system so they can change it.
None send the pic to dvla. The digital ones send it to the local camera partnership who then use the pnc to find keepers details etc.
stop talking bollox
green456:
toby1234abc:
The necklace refers to a burning tyre placed on the neck of the camera to burn the evidence.Melt the photo?how does that work with a digital camera then
it sends the pic to DVLA as soon as it takes it.
have you ever seen anyone from prontoprint going around replacing films in speed cameras
Er - no they are not. The static cameras that stand at the side of the road and flash when they take a photo use traditional 35mm wet film (in a large, drum style magazine). The film has to be changed every few days (so they can develop the pictures and send out the NIPs within the 14 days required by law). It’s not done by Prontaprint, but by a police employee using a van with flashing amber beacons etc.
The average speed cameras (the ones that are normally mounted on a gantry over the carriageway) do use digital video cameras - but nothing gets sent to DVLA, and they don’t take single photographs.
green456:
Akuji:
green456:
toby1234abc:
The necklace refers to a burning tyre placed on the neck of the camera to burn the evidence.Melt the photo?how does that work with a digital camera then
it sends the pic to DVLA as soon as it takes it.
have you ever seen anyone from prontoprint going around replacing films in speed camerasDepends on the camera. Specs are digital but they only record the reg number. Gatsos have a roll of film which can take 400 pictures so effectively they can prosecute 200 drivers per roll. Yes I have seen them on several occasions changing the film. The camera slides down the pole on a sort of winch system so they can change it.
None send the pic to dvla. The digital ones send it to the local camera partnership who then use the pnc to find keepers details etc.
stop talking bollox
It’s you that’s talking out of your arse, try using google
What does it say at the bottom of how it works 
well if it says it on tinternet then it must be true
And Madonna is a fella 
Bale Bandit:
Contraflow:
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?In the quiet words of the Virgin Mary… Come again.
Seriously that post makes no sense
I wouldn’t moan about poor English on here mate or you’ll get an inaccurate lecture about how your own post is erroneous. 
The Sarge:
Used that defence a few years ago. Asked for photo, as it could have been me or my wife - photo turned up and still couldn’t tell which of us it was. Wrote a letter along the lines of “It was definitely one of us, either of us is willing to take the blame, but we are worried that if one of us admits it without being positive it WAS us then we will be committing perjury and open to prosecution. Could you advise us which one of us should commit perjury please?” Never heard anything else
Not saying it would work now though…
Sadly it doesn’t.
They now summons the registered keeper instead.
Good ol’ British Justice!!
■■■■■!!
Truckulent:
The Sarge:
Used that defence a few years ago. Asked for photo, as it could have been me or my wife - photo turned up and still couldn’t tell which of us it was. Wrote a letter along the lines of “It was definitely one of us, either of us is willing to take the blame, but we are worried that if one of us admits it without being positive it WAS us then we will be committing perjury and open to prosecution. Could you advise us which one of us should commit perjury please?” Never heard anything else
Not saying it would work now though…Sadly it doesn’t.
They now summons the registered keeper instead.
Good ol’ British Justice!!
[zb]!!
Innocent till proven guilty and they still gotta prove who was driving
taffytrucker:
Truckulent:
The Sarge:
Used that defence a few years ago. Asked for photo, as it could have been me or my wife - photo turned up and still couldn’t tell which of us it was. Wrote a letter along the lines of “It was definitely one of us, either of us is willing to take the blame, but we are worried that if one of us admits it without being positive it WAS us then we will be committing perjury and open to prosecution. Could you advise us which one of us should commit perjury please?” Never heard anything else
Not saying it would work now though…Sadly it doesn’t.
They now summons the registered keeper instead.
Good ol’ British Justice!!
[zb]!!
Innocent till proven guilty and they still gotta prove who was driving
They want a head on a stick, and they will get one either from the registered company secretary or the registered keeper. Unfortunately 
I thought this would’ve been a thread by professional drivers trying to justify doing 56mph on dual carriageways? Or 50ish on single carriageways?
Maybe not!!
Dogsbody:
I thought this would’ve been a thread by professional drivers trying to justify doing 56mph on dual carriageways? Or 50ish on single carriageways?
Maybe not!!
glad not have to worry bout different speeds on different size roads anymore the posted speed is the speed I go long as its safe to do so 
taffytrucker:
Truckulent:
The Sarge:
Used that defence a few years ago. Asked for photo, as it could have been me or my wife - photo turned up and still couldn’t tell which of us it was. Wrote a letter along the lines of “It was definitely one of us, either of us is willing to take the blame, but we are worried that if one of us admits it without being positive it WAS us then we will be committing perjury and open to prosecution. Could you advise us which one of us should commit perjury please?” Never heard anything else
Not saying it would work now though…Sadly it doesn’t.
They now summons the registered keeper instead.
Good ol’ British Justice!!
[zb]!!
As Innocent till proven guilty and they still gotta prove who was driving
Nope. They don’t. Unfortunately all the old loopholes no longer work due to recent legislation. If you don’t tell them who was driving the registered keeper gets the fun of the fine and points. As Wheel Nut says - they want a head on a stick and they’re going to get one!
It’s the only ‘crime’ you can commit where the justice system is based on what they say rather than actual evidence.
Allegedly.
Truckulent:
taffytrucker:
Truckulent:
The Sarge:
Used that defence a few years ago. Asked for photo, as it could have been me or my wife - photo turned up and still couldn’t tell which of us it was. Wrote a letter along the lines of “It was definitely one of us, either of us is willing to take the blame, but we are worried that if one of us admits it without being positive it WAS us then we will be committing perjury and open to prosecution. Could you advise us which one of us should commit perjury please?” Never heard anything else
Not saying it would work now though…Sadly it doesn’t.
They now summons the registered keeper instead.
Good ol’ British Justice!!
What if the registered keeper was say a 5 year old?![zb]!!
As Innocent till proven guilty and they still gotta prove who was driving
Nope. They don’t. Unfortunately all the old loopholes no longer work due to recent legislation. If you don’t tell them who was driving the registered keeper gets the fun of the fine and points. As Wheel Nut says - they want a head on a stick and they’re going to get one!
It’s the only ‘crime’ you can commit where the justice system is based on what they say rather than actual evidence.
Allegedly.
Would just like to thank the gent or lady that burnt out the camera on Watery Lane in Preston Good on ya.
3rd or 4th time its been “disabled” keep up the good work.
There are many laws I don’t agree with but speeding affects my living and therefore I don’t speed. I did it years ago to keep people behind me happy and it cost me £60 and 3 points - never again I ended up working all day for half wages…would you do that■■?
Sorry if you are behind me but I didn’t make the law, if I’m fully loaded and slow down at hills etc I will pull over though to let you pass.
Why should you loose your livelihood because you have the “sheer audacity” to be doing your job to the best of your ability,and driving not at 90 mph but a miserly 47 on a perfectly clear single carriage way with not a junction in sight?
Why do we allow these excuse my vernacular “■■■■■” ( zb and it began with c) to pontificate about what rate of speed “we” should travel down the road when these diks have probably never ever driven anything bigger than a ■■■■■ ford mondeo.
time to tell them to ■■■■ off me thinks.