Saving gormless billionaires

OUT OF HOURS BULLY'S TRUCKSTOP BAR (INTERACTIVE)
141

JeffA:
Not really - they agree with you because you share their politics. Sit in a tory conference and everyone in the room will tongue punch your fartbox for you - that still doesn’t make you right.

And the problem wasn’t that they were wealthy - if you’d bothered to read the post you’dve understood that. If they ever offer to pay for their rescue then I would say fair play to them.

Well I agree with them, and everyone else it seems bar you on this and no one has ever accused me of being a Tory :smiley: I do love how you whinge on about Tories in one sentence then claim it’s nothing to do with their wealth in the next. You’re clearly driven by jealousy.

142

I imagine that these billionaires would have been massively grateful for the chance to offer to pay for their rescue.

There’s a slight but glaring flaw in your logic Baldrick.

143

JeffA:
Not really - they agree with you because you share their politics. Sit in a tory conference and everyone in the room will tongue punch your fartbox for you - that still doesn’t make you right.

Politics, political allegiance and wealth don’t come into it. They still all had the right for a rescue attempt to be made on them.

You have proved on here that you are obviously a very bitter and jealous individual!

144

switchlogic:
Well I agree with them, and everyone else it seems bar you on this and no one has ever accused me of being a Tory :smiley: I do love how you whinge on about Tories in one sentence then claim it’s nothing to do with their wealth in the next. You’re clearly driven by jealousy.

I think that is evidenced by the ever increasing thread topics he is now starting on the subjects related to the political right, the Tories & wealth.

145

tmcassett:

switchlogic:
Well I agree with them, and everyone else it seems bar you on this and no one has ever accused me of being a Tory :smiley: I do love how you whinge on about Tories in one sentence then claim it’s nothing to do with their wealth in the next. You’re clearly driven by jealousy.

I think that is evidenced by the ever increasing thread topics he is now starting on the subjects related to the political right, the Tories & wealth.

Do you decide what people can make threads about? I have to agree with you or you and the gang start to cry and call names? Its not primary school.

146

the maoster:
I imagine that these billionaires would have been massively grateful for the chance to offer to pay for their rescue.

There’s a slight but glaring flaw in your logic Baldrick.

They still have the chance to offer to pay. If you are so confident do you want to bet they will? Or are you just talkng out of your bottom?

Go on - if you believe what you say put a grand on it.

147

switchlogic:

JeffA:
Not really - they agree with you because you share their politics. Sit in a tory conference and everyone in the room will tongue punch your fartbox for you - that still doesn’t make you right.

And the problem wasn’t that they were wealthy - if you’d bothered to read the post you’dve understood that. If they ever offer to pay for their rescue then I would say fair play to them.

Well I agree with them, and everyone else it seems bar you on this and no one has ever accused me of being a Tory :smiley: I do love how you whinge on about Tories in one sentence then claim it’s nothing to do with their wealth in the next. You’re clearly driven by jealousy.

Yeah but just because 3 sun readers agree with you doesnt make you right. Everything youve said so far has been nonsense - the rescue didnt provide ten million quids worth of “training” and your claim they would pay for the rescue was also wrong. You couldnt have been more wrong if you had tried to be could you? I can see why you stick to insults - because you are so useless at debating.

Surprise me - make a valid point not a schoolboy insult - you can do it! (Maybe not :smiley:

148

JeffA:

tmcassett:
I think that is evidenced by the ever increasing thread topics he is now starting on the subjects related to the political right, the Tories & wealth.

Do you decide what people can make threads about?

Not at all, it’s a free country and you can do as you wish. I can however make an observation as I have done here and my observation was that you clearly have a chip on your shoulder about those things I mentioned above, sonething pretty much everyone else seems to have noticed too.

149

JeffA:

switchlogic:

JeffA:
Not really - they agree with you because you share their politics. Sit in a tory conference and everyone in the room will tongue punch your fartbox for you - that still doesn’t make you right.

And the problem wasn’t that they were wealthy - if you’d bothered to read the post you’dve understood that. If they ever offer to pay for their rescue then I would say fair play to them.

Well I agree with them, and everyone else it seems bar you on this and no one has ever accused me of being a Tory :smiley: I do love how you whinge on about Tories in one sentence then claim it’s nothing to do with their wealth in the next. You’re clearly driven by jealousy.

Yeah but just because 3 sun readers agree with you doesnt make you right.

I’m thinking there’s a good chance I might be included in that stereotype, assuming so then another incorrect assumption.

150

JeffA:

switchlogic:

JeffA:
Not really - they agree with you because you share their politics. Sit in a tory conference and everyone in the room will tongue punch your fartbox for you - that still doesn’t make you right.

And the problem wasn’t that they were wealthy - if you’d bothered to read the post you’dve understood that. If they ever offer to pay for their rescue then I would say fair play to them.

Well I agree with them, and everyone else it seems bar you on this and no one has ever accused me of being a Tory :smiley: I do love how you whinge on about Tories in one sentence then claim it’s nothing to do with their wealth in the next. You’re clearly driven by jealousy.

Yeah but just because 3 sun readers agree with you doesnt make you right. Everything youve said so far has been nonsense - the rescue didnt provide ten million quids worth of “training” and your claim they would pay for the rescue was also wrong. You couldnt have been more wrong if you had tried to be could you? I can see why you stick to insults - because you are so useless at debating.

Surprise me - make a valid point not a schoolboy insult - you can do it! (Maybe not :smiley:

Except I didn’t say those things. Better luck next time my angry friend. Try to be less angry at the world for the sake of your health if nothing else ■■■ (Tho I still suspect you’re trolling)

151

JeffA:

the maoster:
I imagine that these billionaires would have been massively grateful for the chance to offer to pay for their rescue.

There’s a slight but glaring flaw in your logic Baldrick.

They still have the chance to offer to pay. If you are so confident do you want to bet they will? Or are you just talkng out of your bottom?

Go on - if you believe what you say put a grand on it.

They’re dead you moron!

152

the maoster:

JeffA:

the maoster:
I imagine that these billionaires would have been massively grateful for the chance to offer to pay for their rescue.

There’s a slight but glaring flaw in your logic Baldrick.

They still have the chance to offer to pay. If you are so confident do you want to bet they will? Or are you just talkng out of your bottom?

Go on - if you believe what you say put a grand on it.

They’re dead you moron!

Oh my god, are you really that dense? You think they had all their money with them in the sub? They could have put up the money before they went, their estates could contribute or Oceangate the company could pay for it. It makes no difference if they’re dead. Do you understand?

Jesus, try and make replying worth my while. Think a bit before you post.

153

Mr. Praline: 'Ello, I wish to register a complaint.

(No response)

Mr. Praline: 'Ello, Miss?

Owner: What do you mean “miss”?

Mr. Praline: (pause)I’m sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint!

Owner: We’re closin’ for lunch.

Mr. Praline: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this TN Thread what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique.

Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the “Gormless Billionaires”…What’s,uh…What’s wrong with it?

Mr. Praline: I’ll tell you what’s wrong with it, my lad. 'E’s dead, that’s what’s wrong with it!

Owner: No, no, it’s uh,… it’s resting.

Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead TN Thread when I see one, and I’m looking at one right now.

Owner: No no it’s not dead, it’s, it’s restin’! Remarkable TN Thread, the “Gormless Billionaires”… innit? 'Beautiful sentence construction!

Mr. Praline: The sentence construction don’t enter into it. It’s stone dead.

Owner: Nononono, no, no! It’s resting!

Mr. Praline: All right then, if it’s restin’, I’ll wake it up! (shouting at the cage) 'Ello, Mister TN Thread! I’ve got a lovely fresh bit of RDC gossip for you if you show…

(owner hits the cage)

Owner: There, it moved!

Mr. Praline: No, it didn’t, that was you hitting the cage!

Owner: I never!!

Mr. Praline: Yes, you did!

Owner: I never, never did anything…

Mr. Praline: (yelling and hitting the cage repeatedly) 'ELLO THREADY THREADY!!! Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o’clock alarm call!

(Takes TN Thread out of Bully’s and thumps its on the counter. Throws it up in the air and watches it plummet to the floor.)

Mr. Praline: Now that’s what I call a dead TN Thread.

Owner: No, no…No, it’s just stunned!

Mr. Praline: STUNNED?!?

Owner: Yeah! You stunned it, just as it was wakin’ up! Gormless Billionaires stun easily

Need I go on?

154

Say goodnight to the folks Gracie :smiley:

Dont you have any idea what a waiver or insurance is? I havn’t got time to explain it here.

155

youtu.be/YVVTZgwYwVo?t=1

156

Always the ones who aren’t the brightest button in the box who repeatedly bleat on about others low intelligence

157

switchlogic:
Always the ones who aren’t the brightest button in the box who repeatedly bleat on about others low intelligence

You’re so right.

BTW, you forgot to tell me yet again that your mates all agree with you.

158

JeffA:

switchlogic:
Always the ones who aren’t the brightest button in the box who repeatedly bleat on about others low intelligence

You’re so right.

BTW, you forgot to tell me yet again that your mates all agree with you.

159

JeffA:

switchlogic:
Always the ones who aren’t the brightest button in the box who repeatedly bleat on about others low intelligence

You’re so right.

BTW, you forgot to tell me yet again that your mates all agree with you.

Ok yup troll account. Quite well done actually.

160

You know what? The taxpayer should be responsible for paying to clean up after billionaires on a jolly. You’ve convinced me with the depth and intellectual power of your debating skills. Well done Switch!