esso:
for weeks media been printing headlines say black man killed by white
It’s obvious that there is an agenda within an agenda in all this.
Yes its the media manipulataing people minds just like social media. Turn it off and crack on. If jo bloggs who is of different ethnicity say hi say hi back. I always say hi to everyone.
We go abroad on holiday. Just because we were in the euro doesnt meant we are all of same race. Spaniards germans french italians etc would all be other ethnicities if we never joined a union. Pull up your big boy pants and look outside the box. We are all equal. All human.
It is surely the people making the bull posts that are to blame?
Social Media could and should have been a comms device like a Telephone or Walkie Talkie FFS…
If some Terrorist Bomber picks up the phone, phones Al Mushtie, and tells him where to plant his latest bomb device somewhere, the sensible thing to do would be intercept him on the way to plant the device, now that you know what his intentions are on the day…
OUR daft establishment does the equivalent of
“Let’s shut down BT and fine then heavily for allowing a terrorist to use their platform to spread their hate”
Social Media should have been left as a communications outlet - NOT a bloody Publisher with an Editorial and Narrative, meaning it is nothing more than an appendage to the Mainstream Media now.
Tell an uncomfortable Truth? - Banned.
Tell a Liberal-annoying truth you cannot prove? - Banned.
Tell a truth that you CAN prove, but goes against the narrative? - Banned.
Tell a lie, and you’re a nobody - Banned.
Speculate, happen to be correct - Banned.
Tell a Liberal Annoying truth that you CAN prove - Allowed, but de-monetized to “discourage you further”…
Speculate, and be way off the mark - Allowed.
Tell a lie, but you’re on-side with the opposition - Allowed.
Intend harm to the public - but you’re on-side with the opposition - allowed.
Intend no good to anyone, but you don’t support the incumbent government - allowed.
Social Media have already hijacked the “Opposition” then. Let’s not let them hijack what the definition of “Criminal” is as well then, because that’s the way it’s going as it stands…
DF40:
As a man, I used to think I was pretty much just a regular person, but I was born white, into a two-parent household which now, whether I like it or not, makes me “Privileged”, a racist & responsible for slavery.
I am a fiscal & moral conservative, which by today’s standards, makes me a fascist because I plan, budget & support myself and my family.
I went to Secondary School & have always held a job. I now find out that I am not here because I earned it, but because I was "advantaged”.
I am heterosexual, which now makes me a homophobe. I am not a Muslim, which now labels me as an infidel.
I am older than 50, making me a useless eater who doesn’t understand Facebook, Instagram, or Snapchat.
I think & I reason, and I doubt much of what “mainstream” media tells me, which makes me a "Right-wing conspiracy nut”.
I am proud of my heritage & our inclusive British culture, making me a xenophobe.
I believe in hard work, fair play, & fair compensation according to each individual’s merits, which today makes me an anti-socialist.
I believe our system guarantees freedom of effort - not freedom of outcome or subsidies which makes me a borderline sociopath.
I believe in the defence & protection of Great Britain for & by all citizens, now making me a militant.
I am proud of our flag, what it stands for and the many who died to let it fly, so I must be an imperialist and a racist.
Please help me come to terms with the new me because I’m just not sure who I am anymore!
Funny - it all took place over the last 7 or 8 years !!
If all this nonsense wasn’t enough to deal with, now I don’t even know which [zb] toilet to use !!
Sent from my moto e5 play using Tapatalk
“Socially Liberal”
Hear Hear.
The only differences I would add in my own case, was that you only get things held against you as an “Infidel” if you happen to have another faith rather than “none”, eg. if you’re Jewish, Catholic, or some other brand of Christianity - then you WILL be treated rather more poorly than someone who says “I’m an Atheist” I suggest.
I grew up in Brixton, but managed to pass my 11-plus, ending up at Grammar School where I live now in Medway. The only “abuse” I’ve ever had for that - came from Labour councillors and MPs over the years - Hardly at all from the kids from the secondary moderns, who are supposedly the enemies of those who went to Grammar School… Not in my neighborhood of Medway they wern’t!! Medway happens to be an area where there ARE enough Grammar Schools for the local kids making the grade! It was Labour Coucillors that decided to cut funding over four decades now for such schools in favour of the “comibined” secondary moderns though. I’ve told Labour candidates to their faces that I’ll not ever be voting for them - because of what they’ve done against my teenage girl’s (now former) grammar - merging it with the crappiest “School of Vandalism” in the entire area FFS… I’m socially liberal, so I found that despite being Straight, I got left alone by “those against Homophobes”, oddly enough… Perhaps they thought I must be of the Rainbow Number because I’ve hung out with plenty of them over the years? - Who cares. I judge people by their character - not what they do behind closed doors… To me, being anti LGTB is like wanting to deck someone because they happen to pee downwards in the toilets instead of perpendicular to the Urinal… The entire concept of “hating someone because of their different ■■■■■■ tastes” is absurd - providing my own boundaries are respected as a “Straight” guy, of course. I reserve the right to smack someone touching my arse the same as any woman should slap a guy who touches her arse. ■■■■■■ Assault is ■■■■■■ Assaut - equal society - let’s uphold that law eh?
I don’t fancy every female going though… I reserve the right to not fancy whomever I please. (As it happens, I am most-put-off by lack of personal hygiene in a prospective born-female ■■■■■■ partner - nothing to do with age or beauty there, but I still couldn’t bring myself to kiss the most clean, dapper dressed guy to save my life. )
I’m not a Fiscal Conservative though, as I don’t believe in repaying debts at the cost of one’s family…
This moral imperative to “repay a debt, even at the cost of one’s life” - seems to need great REFORM in our day and age.
Isn’t it absurd that most people don’t even believe in God nowadays, but fear a punishment of “Hellfire” if they welched on a debt - and a debt to a public pariah like a BANK at that■■?
I’m Fiscally Left Wing.
Law and Order though? - I think all violent criminals should be jumped on with the full force of the Police, whatever “restraining” methods necessary to make the arrest.
Just as a Soldier fighting for Queen and Country CANNOT ever be a “murderer of the assigned enemy” at any time - the same goes for the police going about their duty.
If they attempt to arrest a violent criminal, they resist “not my police” - and in the scuffle the perp ends up dead for ANY reason or circumstance - then the police are NOT at fault.
They are the POLICE so CANNOT be at fault when it comes to subduing a suspect in my mind.
On Law and Order then - I’m Right Wing.
chrisdalott:
The guy on the left hired the plane to fly the banner, don’t think I need to say more
l
Remember a few days ago - BBC were about to remove this comedy classic from Iplayer… - Very much in the same vein as the picture above…
Just because someone apes Hitler in some fashion, doesn’t make them Hitler themselves.
Why jump to the conclusion that it’s a reference to Hiter?
You’re as bad as the press jumping on anything that can be tenuously linked to right wing agenda to make a point.
Have a closer look, he could be more than likely impersoating Hercule Poirot with that type of tache…or just a random generic guy with a silly moustache just for a laugh.
I ain’t sticking up for the kid, he does not look the brightest button in the box, but keep things in perspective ffs.
You’re making the same argument as me there, not the opposite one.
These two lads are clearly sending up Hitler, but other less discerning eyes might see these two lads as being “Tommy Robinson Fodder” of some kind, like the stereotype we’re expected to both look for and actually see…
It is the horizontal finger under the nose - that represented the dead giveaway here, I even posted the best-known example - the John Cleese goosestep, featuring that same “finger”…
Winseer:
You’re making the same argument as me there, not the opposite one.
These two lads are clearly sending up Hitler, but other less discerning eyes might see these two lads as being “Tommy Robinson Fodder” of some kind, like the stereotype we’re expected to both look for and actually see…
It is the horizontal finger under the nose - that represented the dead giveaway here, I even posted the best-known example - the John Cleese goosestep, featuring that same “finger”…
I did get it how you came to that conclusion, but if you enlarge the pic it is a Begian style Poirot moustache drawn on his finger, not a German (Austrian) Hitler type moustache, which you would have thought would be drawn on his finger (or none at all) if it was a ■■■■ gesture (or sending up Hitler as you say) he was trying to put out.
Winseer:
You’re making the same argument as me there, not the opposite one.
These two lads are clearly sending up Hitler, but other less discerning eyes might see these two lads as being “Tommy Robinson Fodder” of some kind, like the stereotype we’re expected to both look for and actually see…
It is the horizontal finger under the nose - that represented the dead giveaway here, I even posted the best-known example - the John Cleese goosestep, featuring that same “finger”…
I did get it how you came to that conclusion, but if you enlarge the pic it is a Begian style Poirot moustache drawn on his finger, not a German (Austrian) Hitler type moustache, which you would have thought would be drawn on his finger (or none at all) if it was a ■■■■ gesture (or sending up Hitler as you say) he was trying to put out.
Consider this: If you upload a photo that contains a group of pixels that looks like a black-in-colour toothbrush moustache - then that picture will flag up on the photoscanner algorhythm as “This perp’s uploading a Hitler photo… Scan text to see if he instantly condems ■■■■ on every line of text - or else we’ll auto-ban him, and entirely wipe out his account” - which is essentially what happened to my FB account last August…
SO… You disguise “toothbrush moustache” by paiting a completely irrelevant moustache on one’s finger, and hold THAT under your nose doing the proberbial goosestep…
I don’t think there’s a software algorhythm that sets out to detect wayward Poirot moustaches, as we’ve already got an annoying guy over in Belgium that far more deserves to right royally be sent up.
(See what I did there - included the “text of defusing”)
^^^^^^^^
how about spike milligan…surely he cant be racist…an irish dad and an english mum,plus he was born in india…nothing for the racists to complain about there??
chrisdalott:
The guy on the left hired the plane to fly the banner, don’t think I need to say more
So exactly what is your problem with ‘the banner’.That’s obviously what you’re referring to in this case.
well theres no problem saying white lives matter as such
but why do they feel they need to start an argument, if someone says BLM do you really have to come back with all lives matter. cant you just agree? that theres racism in this country that we can try to make things better. cant you just show some empathy and solidarity with your fellow man?
like if you told me your house was burgled i think the normal reaction would be to say thats a shame, i hope they catch them and you get your telly back, is there anything you need to borrow?
what if you said you were burgled and i immediately said that all houses could be burgled, that my house might get burgled soon, that my house matters to me. wouldnt be very neighborly would it. thats my problem with the banner
Winseer:
You’re making the same argument as me there, not the opposite one.
These two lads are clearly sending up Hitler, but other less discerning eyes might see these two lads as being “Tommy Robinson Fodder” of some kind, like the stereotype we’re expected to both look for and actually see…
It is the horizontal finger under the nose - that represented the dead giveaway here, I even posted the best-known example - the John Cleese goosestep, featuring that same “finger”…
I did get it how you came to that conclusion, but if you enlarge the pic it is a Begian style Poirot moustache drawn on his finger, not a German (Austrian) Hitler type moustache, which you would have thought would be drawn on his finger (or none at all) if it was a ■■■■ gesture (or sending up Hitler as you say) he was trying to put out.
Consider this: If you upload a photo that contains a group of pixels that looks like a black-in-colour toothbrush moustache - then that picture will flag up on the photoscanner algorhythm as “This perp’s uploading a Hitler photo… Scan text to see if he instantly condems ■■■■ on every line of text - or else we’ll auto-ban him, and entirely wipe out his account” - which is essentially what happened to my FB account last August…
SO… You disguise “toothbrush moustache” by paiting a completely irrelevant moustache on one’s finger, and hold THAT under your nose doing the proberbial goosestep…
I don’t think there’s a software algorhythm that sets out to detect wayward Poirot moustaches, as we’ve already got an annoying guy over in Belgium that far more deserves to right royally be sent up.
0
(See what I did there - included the “text of defusing”)
No I didn’t see ‘‘what you did there’’ Winseer …as I ain’t got a clue wtf you’re prattling on about mate (as usual).
Tell you what I’ll concede the argument…you win it.
Carryfast:
So exactly what is your problem with ‘the banner’.That’s obviously what you’re referring to in this case.
well theres no problem saying white lives matter as such
but why do they feel they need to start an argument, if someone says BLM do you really have to come back with all lives matter. cant you just agree? that theres racism in this country that we can try to make things better. cant you just show some empathy and solidarity with your fellow man?
like if you told me your house was burgled i think the normal reaction would be to say thats a shame, i hope they catch them and you get your telly back, is there anything you need to borrow?
what if you said you were burgled and i immediately said that all houses could be burgled, that my house might get burgled soon, that my house matters to me. wouldnt be very neighborly would it. thats my problem with the banner
It’s clear that the analogy that you’re actually making is more along the lines of the person at whatever address might have been burgled or he might have fallen down the stairs while trying to burgle the place or it might have just been an accident.
But let’s call him the victim of a violent burglary regardless of the facts just based on the colour of his skin.
All I was getting at there, was that we both made the same argument in a different way, and for different reasons.
The simple truth is that since 1945 there have been exactly ZERO nazis in power anywhere in the world, at any time since. That means “Deaths due to Nazis” must also be zero, assuming one doesn’t count the actual nazis getting their collective necks stretched following the Nuremberg Trials…
Meanwhile, since 1945 there have been over 100,000,000 people killed as a direct result of “Socialist Far Left Governments” around the world, along with their disastrous policies.
This doesn’t mean their victims were necessary killed “directly”, Eg. Executed or sending them to Gulags…
FAMINE has been the largest killer of citizens with a Hard Socialist government, be it Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao Tse Tung the better known examples of Far Left.
Dictators such as Galtieri, Gadaffi, Hussein, Pinnochet, and Amin?
More guilty of directly killing their victims, but a whole lot less killed compared to the top row special I listed above.
That this country, and others forming part of the Western Hemisphere spend so much energy “making sure the Far Right never get anywhere in politics” - has now left us open to the machinations of that far LEFT again.
Black Lives matter? - If it went the whole hog - it would be Whites become the slaves of Non-Whites. That’s it.
There’s no point having any kind of “Rebellion” or “Revolution” if the final outcome is automatically worse that what was there before.
The world’s peoples tend to jerk Right in evading such a system, as Bonaparte found himself benefiting from at Robespiere’s expense, for instance.
Nowdays though? - The Establishment simply does not LET the population “Jerk Right” any longer. The Conservative Party are as far Right as one is allowed to support, and they are arguably on the verge of going slightly left of Center these days, with Sunak making sure we are all equal - but some are more equal than others in Furlough, Benefits, or even Taxation.
The correct outcome for the Reading case is to get more police out there in future rather than Less.
We should be hearing more “Streatham” than “Reading” in the future, where a perp pulls a knife in public, and less than 10 seconds later is shot down by armed police. NO questions asked.
Even with such a quick response time - two people were injured before the perp could be blown away.
THAT however is a better alternative than this contact evasiveness of our police trying to make the Far Left “never their fault, never connected” whilst so-called Far Right activists that were not even involved - get blamed for everything, such as the assassination of Jo Cox - not done by a proper member of EDL/Britain First, but conveniently labled thus before being sent down to do his time, never to be heard from again.
The Liberal Fraternity will pay a heavy spiratual price for harbouring the evil that they perpetuate - by bearing false witness as they do.
It doesn’t matter if such a Liberal closet Far Left “useful idiot” helper is an atheist or not even, as damnation is real enough at death for everyone, regardless of what one thinks happens to one at death.
Last time I looked, you either get put in the ground for worm food, or you get burned down to a broken skeleton, and ground to powder in a cremulator. That’s the end of everyone’s physical life on Earth, so the last thing we should do as a society is make it easier for Criminals to go about killing people, and eventually being released from prison to do it all over again.
Life is precious. Choose to preserve Good life over Bad then. I doubt if many families of people murdered would like to see the assailant “treated well in prison”. FFS it is supposed to be a punishment, not a drain on the state for decades that could be made much much cheaper with a length of hemp, and a reasonable period for “appeals”, say 30 days, “Must have new evidence to appeal”, along with a 12-0 Jury result “Guilty” of course. I reckon the British Public would be itching to send most of these perps that have killed - to the gallows.
Was there ever a case where 3 diehard hanging abolitionists refused to convinct an obviously guilty murderer on the grounds “they didn’t want him to hang”…■■
…Or even a Jury recommending back in the day that “Leniancy” be shown to the convicted, rather than the judge overrule them, and just “get on with it”…?
)
