found these on anoher forum. dunno if the volvo is real but the renault certainly does.
The FH deffo looks photshop to me.
yeh.agree their fh looks like been through photoshop to many times
So has the rhino, spot the mistake?
i dont see the mistake in the magnum,
id love to own the volvo though.
MR VAIN:
So has the rhino, spot the mistake?
Exhaust
DAFMAD:
MR VAIN:
So has the rhino, spot the mistake?Exhaust
Top man. The exhaust would remain in its original position.
yep, agreed, spotted the exhaust was too far back as soon as i looked at it
It is photo shopped but have you made this decision because the scania longline has the exhaust in the original place? It would make more sense to have it as far back as possible to reduce in cab noise whilst driving. It wasn’t the exhaust that did it for me, the window on the side has completely the wrong reflection.
Also the side box has been stretched, they’d not do that. Maybe put 2 in if they wanted to do that. Also the panel shapings are wrong for a stretched cab.
dunno, the crapnum looks pretty real - as someone said why wouldn’t you stretch or add to the exhaust to take noise away, and the extra window is at a different angle to the perpendicular (ooooh!) from the driver’s window, so might show a different reflection 
photoshop ormnot, think i’d have the volvo.
if the longer cabmeans you have to spend longer in it…gimme a shorter cab 
MR VAIN:
So has the rhino, spot the mistake?
second grab rail… on the magnum…■■?
and the window looks like a different tint …■■?
FH is just plain wrong, The Magnum doesn’t look right either, the grab handle looks fine to me, but the exhaust is wrong, I dont agree with the noise angle, it’s a left ■■■■■■ so putting the tail pipe on the opposite side would have a far greater & much less expensive effect, I know the Kermits interpret the laws differently to us which is why they run around in Kenworths & the like, especially around the Marseille area & the Magnum has a Marseille registration but I think camera trickery is involved here