Could somebody quickly check my times and make sure I’ve got this right please?
I finished last Friday at 1821, and then had a slightly reduced weekly rest until 1406 on Sunday, when I started again and worked until 2010. By my reckoning I’ve got to compensate for 1h15m.
I then did the following times Monday to Friday this week:
I reckon I’ll be stopping at about 8ish tonight and running in for the final hour or so in the morning. Based on what I’ve put above, am I right in thinking that a) my reduced rest was compensated for on Wednesday night, and b) I’m ok running in tomorrow morning, as long as I’m finished before 1406 tomorrow?
scaniason:
Could somebody quickly check my times and make sure I’ve got this right please?
I finished last Friday at 1821, and then had a slightly reduced weekly rest until 1406 on Sunday, when I started again and worked until 2010. By my reckoning I’ve got to compensate for 1h15m.
I then did the following times Monday to Friday this week:
I reckon I’ll be stopping at about 8ish tonight and running in for the final hour or so in the morning. Based on what I’ve put above, am I right in thinking that a) my reduced rest was compensated for on Wednesday night, and b) I’m ok running in tomorrow morning, as long as I’m finished before 1406 tomorrow? = 144 HOURS/NEXT WEEKLY REST MUST START BY SUNDAY 0710
Thanks
Gary
YOU MUST HAVE A FULL WEEKLY REST AND THAT MUST START BY 2359 THIS SUNDAY
ITS POSSIBLE THAT YOU COULD HAVE A REDUCED THIS WEEKEND BUT THAT WOULD DEPEND ON WHAT YOU DID OVER THE LAST FEW WEEKS
IF YOU ARE STARTING AT 0700 MONDAY THEN TO GET IN A FULL WEEKLY REST YOU NEED TO START THAT BY 1000 SATURDAY
Thanks for the replies, I’ve just got parked up, so will be on my way at about 7 in the morning, and hopefully starting my rest by 0830. I’m starting again at 7 on Monday, so all should be good.
One thing I’ve just picked up, I’d assumed that once you’ve compensated for a reduced rest, you could then have another reduced following it. From what I’ve read, I take it that I have to have a full weekly before I can have another reduced, is that right?
scaniason:
One thing I’ve just picked up, I’d assumed that once you’ve compensated for a reduced rest, you could then have another reduced following it. From what I’ve read, I take it that I have to have a full weekly before I can have another reduced, is that right?
Gary
You cannot have two reduced weekly rests in a row whether you’ve compensated for the first one or not. Every other week must be a full weekly rest.
scaniason:
One thing I’ve just picked up, I’d assumed that once you’ve compensated for a reduced rest, you could then have another reduced following it. From what I’ve read, I take it that I have to have a full weekly before I can have another reduced, is that right?
Gary
A FULL weekly rest is one where there are at least 45 unbroken hours off
Conor:
You cannot have two reduced weekly rests in a row whether you’ve compensated for the first one or not. Every other week must be a full weekly rest.
You CAN have 2 reduced weekly rest in a row but not 2 reduced weekly rests assigned to 2 consecutive weeks
Simple legal example -
One week holliday with the last 45 hours of that assigned to WEEK 1 because it enters that week
WEEK 1 = mon 0600 to sat 1900
Sat 1900 to mon 0600 = REDUCED WEEKLY REST (A)
WEEK 2 = mon 0600 to sat 1900
sat 1900 to mon 0600 = REDUCED WEEKLY REST (B)
WEEK 3 = mon 0600 to fri 1900
fri 1900 to mpn 0600 = FULL WEEKLY REST assigned to WEEK 3
REDUCED WEEKLY REST (A) or (B) can be assigned as the weekly rest for WEEK 2 with the unassigned one only being there to prevent more than 144 hours being done and it does not need compensating for
I just KNEW you would end up overcomplicating it! The op asked if he was ok with what he did, which he was. I added a bit of info that he evidently wasn’t aware of; then you had to show off and add some information that, whilst correct, didn’t need to be put into the thread.
The Sarge:
I just KNEW you would end up overcomplicating it! The op asked if he was ok with what he did, which he was. I added a bit of info that he evidently wasn’t aware of; then you had to show off and add some information that, whilst correct, didn’t need to be put into the thread.
The OP was answered in FULL and THEN another member stated something which was not spot on
I can see that putting too much in before the OP was answered could be an issue but hardly one afterwards …
The op asked if he was ok with what he did, which he was. I added a bit of info that he evidently wasn’t aware of; then you had to show off and add some information that, whilst correct, didn’t need to be put into the thread.