GhostRider17:
robroy:
GhostRider17:
commonrail:
Was talking to driver,the other night…who had worked nights,for the same company,for 13 years.
£8.72 per hour.
Time and a half after 40. 
That’s pretty shocking for night work,I’m guessing they keep him as close to 40 hours as they can too!
If he does 50 hours it levels out to about 9.50 an hour…unless I’ve worked that out wrong

Ok it’s crap, but there are a lot working for around that rate in some areas of the country
I really don’t know how the haulage industry has changed to this,some class 1 drivers are on minimum wage. To me the biggest kick in the nuts is the tax,if you’ve put some serious hours in one week you lose a load in tax. The taxman with his nice 35 hour week doesn’t take into account how many hours you’ve had to put in just to get a half decent wage.
I’ve wondered about this issue of “paying tax on minimum wage”, and wonder if Sunak later this year is going to “reform” the system so that only those earning more than 48 hours @ minimum wages - pay that tax, rather than at present where you’d have to have a sweatshop leicester job to “duck under” the threshold of say, £512 earnings per month before this Universal Credit taper-off kicks in with it’s 63% reduction that on top of 20% tax and 12% NICs means you’re effectively working for 5p in the pound once you go beyond this £512 per month earnings figure, which is what? - £124 per week? Even at minimum wages - that amounts to a job that only has 14ish hours per week, not even the “16 hours counting as part time” - Is the next intent having kids as young as 5 driving trucks like they used to sweep chimneys FFS? The mind boggles of how the goverment can let this “Backdoor Slavery” even happen - but there it is, even under a Tory Government with a so-called Right Wing Home Secretary…

Surely the FAIR way to do it would be to make taxes and “in work deductions” only apply to those hours above say, 35 hours @ minimum wage, or around £1250-£1300 per month income below which nothing gets touched ?
As it stands, firms will aim for limboing below minimum wage net earnings as much as they legally can get away with, which as we’ve seen from the Leicester Sweatshop example recently - gets topped up to the then MAXIMUM extent by “in-work benefits”, making the Government rather than the hapless sweatshop worker the main source of income for that below-NMW worker…
Let’s see who falls out of the tree should In-Work benefits be re-ordered to favour those working long hours for minimum wage, whereas those who are fit & healthy (Eg. “Asylym Seekers”) don’t get any benefits at all if they then work NO hours.
This would also have the side effect of discouraging zero hours contracts, which as we all know - are very unpopular on the Left of politics in particular.
As a prospective employer: You either have a job for someone to do - or you do NOT.
Let’s see an end to this “single run, cancelled at last minute, worker wastes commute cost over and over again, no comeback” culture.
The minimum amount of work for an agency to be able to dish out should be either a single 12 hour shift OR a full working week of at LEAST 40 hours, for which you are paid - 12 hours per day, or 40 hours for that week.
Managers that encourage drivers to “falsify their tachos” - need to be taken out and shot - seriously. 