Apparently the big threat comes from white, middle aged men putting flags up doncha know?
Yep , as reported in the Daily Fail
…9th November…
1 Like
Ha ha ha ha. As I posted I knew with 100% surety that you’d be furiously tapping away my friend. Nothing if not predictable 
Care to refute the report?
I’ll leave you and google to have some “special “ time. No need to hurry 
How the Daily Fail found out about SAS and security plans is unbeknown to me.
But since last year’s ceremonies passed off without serious incident, all is well.
Yeah you would have thought YOU of all people would have been kept in the loop.
That’s fine then…..
So nothing happened last year so ‘‘all is well this year’‘ what a relief.
Just trying to decide who to go with SAS Intel.
Or the wisdom of Franglais
Hmmmmm🤭
I’ll speak to the boat shed to ensure you’re kept firmly in the loop
Lots of things pass without incident. Once we develop that time travel machine we can go back and remove all of those expensive and unnecessary security measures.
Oh, hang on a minute….
True enough.
Maybe serious incidents were prevented by actions the public never hear of.
The fact we do not hear of them, is not proof they happened though.
But what relevance is
to do with a reported security operation last year?
The relevance is that it’s a talking point. You do understand the concept I’m sure?
It’s telling and also quite interesting (given your obvious mental problems) that you’ll happily question anything BUT what you are told by those in authority. Why is that? Why do you you feel an overwhelming urge to tilt at windmills? Did something bad happen to you in the past?
You want to talk about blokes and flags? Fine.
Talk about year old security issues? Fine.
But why link them in the same post?
That might be better posted in the thread about “Amateur Psychoanalysis Of People I Have Never Met”. I am sure others will be happy to use that “as a talking point.”
Why not? You the internet police all of a sudden?
I searched for that thread but couldn’t find it shock horror.
One doesn’t need a degree in any kind of ology to understand that you are a contrarian who’d argue black was white all day long because of some deep need to appear superior.
I imagine that in some alternate reality where you actually mix with real people in a social context that you think that your knickname is actually “ah Jesus” because that’s precisely what people would say upon your approach
1 Like
Hard to put any moral justifiable spin on this one. Can’t be true it’s from GB News.
Quote:" Kebatu was forcibly removed from the UK on Tuesday with a team of five escorts on the deportation flight. He was given a £500 discretionary payment by the removals team as an alternative to the slower and more expensive process of further detaining him and putting him on a new flight, which could have faced a legal challenge, according to the PA news agency."
Morally I can see no justification, in paying criminals money.
I can see an argument to pay that amount to get the bugger out quickly, and, in the long run, more cheaply.
Should extra cash be paid to be more fair?
Quite possibly so.
Paying more money to keep him actually under lock and key in the UK is definitely an option.
Why would you even consider that for a second as an option?
We have no responsibility to these ■■■■ s, they should not be here, ……they arrived here illegally.
That is the point where any argument for doing any god dam thing for these individuals stops.
Come to the UK, commit a sex crime, and be released somewhere else? After serving little or no prison time?
Because it is cheaper?
I find myself in a rare accord with you paying any criminal sticks in my throat, but as you said the alternative would be long winded and considerably more expensive for the tax payer.
The unexplored and infinitely preferable alternative would be for the five escorts to snap his arms and legs and drag him by his throat onto the aircraft, but apparently that would be frowned upon.
I am undecided. (Sorry!)
It is cheaper to deport him straight off, agreed.
But it is releasing a sex offender early to save money. What does that say? If foreigners offend in the UK, they just sent away with no real punishment?
I don’t have any answers, but am not happy about how some predatory ■■■■■■■■ might be looking at it.
It might cost more but shouldn’t foreigners be punished before being deported? More expense, but at least there is more deterrent.