240 Gardner:
DEANB:
Cant make the name out on the Borderer ■■?
Winsford Transport?
Thanks for the name “240 Gardner” 
moomooland:
0Taken at the junction of the A350 Westbury Road and West Ashton Road at Yarnbrook near Trowbridge. The Longs Arms in the background on Hawkeridge Road Yarnbrook is still there today.
Google Street View Today
Thanks Paul,for the info where the pic was taken. What i find unusual in that photo is its paint work looks
fresh no scuffs/marks on bumper etc ! Where is the tipper body ■■? Maybe it was involved in an accident
and was going to have another tipper body fitted ■■ Only reason i am saying that is i only ever remember
seeing tipper bodies on EEC trucks ? The quarry chaps on here may know more.Another explanation could be
that it was an owner driver possibly who had bought a second and chassis and was putting a tipper body on
it

gingerfold:
DEANB:
Anyone recognise the AEC ■■
0
No, don’t recognise the AEC but he’s pushing the maximum height. A Motorway bridge allows 16 ft 6 inches of clearance and I reckon his height is 16 ft. And I’d want at least one more chain on the trailers. Not impressed.


I have to say there have been a few loads in the photo’s that dont look that well secured !! 
bob-lad:
that erf with the single axle is one of vincit carriers of Trafford park they were a part of carborundum they ran an ageing fleet sometimes recabing until jas f aidley of Urmston took over the transport , Trafford park storage motors were owned by smiths of eccles tdg they had a crusader as well , ken elsby had an interesting fleet with cancelled export fodens and experimental ones
Thanks for the information !

Chris Webb:
moomooland:
lespullan:
L P G Batley, logo on door a bit vague.
1 Think your right Les LPG Transport from Batley Yorkshire looks like it had been sold on when the picture was taken.
0Photograph courtesy of Leslie Wilson.
That F86 artic with tar tank would have worked out of BSC Chemicals at Orgreave Sheffield int 70s.
Thanks Chris ! 
ERF-NGC-European:
Buzzer:
ERF-NGC-European:
Are they vents in the front of that tilt - I mean those black discs on the sheet. If so, what might they have been transporting to warrant puncturing a tilt canopy? Or is it just a random design? Robert
0
Robert years ago before all fruit went into frigo’s because the super markets wanted that many loads of oranges were brought from Spain in tilts, some had vents like that in the picture or they used to fold the front corner of the tilt to let air flow to keep the load cool, also some frigo’s had little pop holes at the top each side of the motor to vent, when we loaded strawberries down the bottom of Spain they used to gas the load and shut the door, then after 12 hours you were told to open the back doors also to vent. Not sure if the gas was to kill any creepy crawlies or what, Buzzer.
Thank you Buzzer! Yes that makes sense. Cheers, Robert
Yes,its amazing what you learn on here !

Bewick:
gingerfold:
DEANB:
Anyone recognise the AEC ■■
2
No, don’t recognise the AEC but he’s pushing the maximum height. A Motorway bridge allows 16 ft 6 inches of clearance and I reckon his height is 16 ft. And I’d want at least one more chain on the trailers. Not impressed.

1
0

ERF-NGC-European:
gingerfold:
DEANB:
Anyone recognise the AEC ■■
0
No, don’t recognise the AEC but he’s pushing the maximum height. A Motorway bridge allows 16 ft 6 inches of clearance and I reckon his height is 16 ft. And I’d want at least one more chain on the trailers. Not impressed.

I’m with you there, Gingerfold. I used to assemble and haul a good few tri-stack empties to the docks in the '80s. Looking at that stack in the picture, it looks like a disaster waiting to happen. A lot of trailers in those days still didn’t have spring-brakes and they leaked air like sieves. You only needed an air-leak to risk the top trailer becoming a loose canon when you applied the brakes on the unit. This is why you needed to strap (or at least rope) each trailer down murder tight and secure the bogies from shifting both forwards and backwards on each trailer in the stack by judicious use of straps. There was a simple and logical way of doing that and you took short cuts at your peril: that top trailer could crush your cab if it plummeted forward. Robert
Cheers for your comments Robert ! 
moomooland:
2 L Woodward & Sons Ltd of Crossley Stud Farm Buxton Road, Congleton, Cheshire are still very much in business today running a few artics.
1Back in 1987 they bought this brand new Seddon Atkinson 401 eight wheeler.
0In September 1988 added this ■■■■■■■ powered ERF E14 6x2 tractor unit to their fleet.
Thanks Paul,some good pics again ! 
bob-lad:
woodwards were behind the flower pot pub in them days not far from reg stevens original yard
Thanks again Rob, “flower pot pub” ,thats an unusual name for a boozer !

Dieseldog66:
ERF-NGC-European:
gingerfold:
DEANB:
Anyone recognise the AEC ■■
0
No, don’t recognise the AEC but he’s pushing the maximum height. A Motorway bridge allows 16 ft 6 inches of clearance and I reckon his height is 16 ft. And I’d want at least one more chain on the trailers. Not impressed.

I’m with you there, Gingerfold. I used to assemble and haul a good few tri-stack empties to the docks in the '80s. Looking at that stack in the picture, it looks like a disaster waiting to happen. A lot of trailers in those days still didn’t have spring-brakes and they leaked air like sieves. You only needed an air-leak to risk the top trailer becoming a loose canon when you applied the brakes on the unit. This is why you needed to strap (or at least rope) each trailer down murder tight and secure the bogies from shifting both forwards and backwards on each trailer in the stack by judicious use of straps. There was a simple and logical way of doing that and you took short cuts at your peril: that top trailer could crush your cab if it plummeted forward. Robert
Would have been safer if he had wound the legs down on each trailer.

Suedehead:
ERF-NGC-European:
Are they vents in the front of that tilt - I mean those black discs on the sheet. If so, what might they have been transporting to warrant puncturing a tilt canopy? Or is it just a random design? Robert
0
The unit looks the same colour scheme as WH Malcolms.
Thanks for your comments “Suedehead” or possibly a owner driver ■■

Retired Old ■■■■:
gingerfold:
moomooland:
1RH Stevens Transport went bust in 2011 this article appeared in Commercial Motor back in July of that year…
“Abbey Logistics Group boosted its bulk powder transport division by picking up assets from the collapsed haulier RH Stevens Transport and customers from its successor company Macclesfield Transport.
Under the deal, Abbey will take on the firm’s powder tanker fleet of 25 trucks and 40 tankers, as well as all drivers, planning staff, and some workshop employees, from 31 July 2011.
RH Stevens Transport put its three subsidiaries into liquidation in February 2011 following several large contract losses and established Macclesfield Transport to satisfy the remaining contracts”.
Full article here
0That horrible shade of pink was even registered as ‘Stevens Pink’. 
There’s more to that article than meets the eye, but unfortunately I cannot comment further for confidentiality reasons.
Go on, Gingerfold, go for it!
As an employed driver for the firm at the time, I can reveal that none of it’s employees were told about a firm called “Macclesfield Transport”. The writing had been on the wall for some time, with the firm hanging on by it’s fingertips until a deal had been done with a property company for the depot.
Thanks for your comments “ROF” 
smallcoal:
ERF-NGC-European:
gingerfold:
Anyone recognise the AEC ■■
1
No, don’t recognise the AEC but he’s pushing the maximum height. A Motorway bridge allows 16 ft 6 inches of clearance and I reckon his height is 16 ft. And I’d want at least one more chain on the trailers. Not impressed.

I’m with you there, Gingerfold. I used to assemble and haul a good few tri-stack empties to the docks in the '80s. Looking at that stack in the picture, it looks like a disaster waiting to happen. A lot of trailers in those days still didn’t have spring-brakes and they leaked air like sieves. You only needed an air-leak to risk the top trailer becoming a loose canon when you applied the brakes on the unit. This is why you needed to strap (or at least rope) each trailer down murder tight and secure the bogies from shifting both forwards and backwards on each trailer in the stack by judicious use of straps. There was a simple and logical way of doing that and you took short cuts at your peril: that top trailer could crush your cab if it plummeted forward. Robert
Here’s a pic of my mate Phil in Folkestone with topped trailers cheers John
Would have been safer if he had wound the legs down on each trailer.
Thanks for the pic John ! 