I think the truth will out in the next few days, so just for a bit of fun, who do you think it may be?
Be careful with your comments
I think the truth will out in the next few days, so just for a bit of fun, who do you think it may be?
Be careful with your comments
aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10 ⌠y-bbc.html
Itâs anyoneâs guess but it looks like Saddam Hussein wasnât so bad after all.
If the fourth option down was called Roger Younger Iâd lay odds on him, and why is there no option for all of them.
raymundo:
If the fourth option down was called Roger Younger Iâd lay odds on him, and why is there no option for all of them.
Took me a few seconds, but thatâs brilliant
I am surprised Willie hasnât had a few more votes.
Was Justin Fashanu and Stephen Milligans death anything to do with this story?
The former member for Basildon whose name is an anagram of âO arch Tory pervâ
The former member for Cleveland and ?.
Looks like Phillip Schofields list
rearaxle:
Looks like Phillip Schofields list
Apparently so. I am wondering if he is a member on here
Seems like there will be no final result
Wheel Nut:
rearaxle:
Looks like Phillip Schofields listApparently so. I am wondering if he is a member on here
Seems like there will be no final result
What a surprise.Perverts in high places all looking after each other.Nothing new there.
Some say the Iron Lady might even actually have been a bloke whoâd had a â â â change operation. Which would explain where the Conservatives got their unfair advantage from during the 1979 elections.
Arthur Scargill for PM probably doesnât seem so bad now after all even for the Daily Mail readers.
Oh well Lord McAlpine doesnât need to be under the âOtherâ radio button now he has been named and cleared by the âmistakenâ victims
In fact it is like reading 1984 again, apparently there were no perverts in Government, they were all enemies of the state and are now terminated or elected members of UKIP
Wheel Nut:
Oh well Lord McAlpine doesnât need to be under the âOtherâ radio button now he has been named and cleared by the âmistakenâ victimsIn fact it is like reading 1984 again, apparently there were no perverts in Government, they were all enemies of the state and are now terminated or elected members of UKIP
Blimey itâs a bit risky naming names donât be surprised if you get the whole Tory Party still living from the Thatcher years coming after you for compensation for defamation.
The bit I donât get according to the vctim he never actually said it was him in the original photo that he was shown by the law at the time he made the accusation.According to the story in the news it was actually the âlawâ who are supposed to have told âhimâ who it was that he identified in the photo and was therefore putting in the frame.When itâs obvious that no copper worth his salt would have said anything about âwhoâ it was because the question would just have been is that the bloke who you saw and the answer would have been yes or no and then it would have been up to the law to sort out exactly âwhoâ it actually was if the answer had been yes.
Which doesnât take a genius to realise would have been a diversionary tactic to get the heat away from the real perv. No surprise that the BBC have turned it all back on the victim instead of asking the relevant questions as to how and why the wrong name got put by the law to the original photograph that the victim picked out as being the criminal in question.