Ok, I can see this spiralling so let’s stop it here and now.
PAUSE!
Welcome to Trucknet Lee, it’s actually not a bad place so don’t let this intro put you off.
Good luck at Whitakers.
Just for future reference, we don’t accuse companies of running bent on here, there are VOSA / DVSA, Police, Wombles etc who all frequent this site.
If you have PROOF that a company is running bent, you can pm a warning to someone thinking of going for a job there, or deal with it with any other way you like, but other than that, the words ‘that company runs bent’ aren’t used, they can be very damaging to reputation which can have financial consequences.
All the companies that i have done tramping for all carry a gallon of engine oil , not because the rings are worn to excess , but because it’s a dam sight cheaper for then to buy a 205ltr drum of oil than drivers buying oil from msa’s and the like,should the truck even need topping up with oil, that to me is common sense not running bent
leeyarnold:
Sound like a trouble maker you robroy back off
Troublemaker ■■?
You came on a public forum and accused several companies of being bent , and you call someone else a troublemaker
Thanks for your report, I’ve read your posts now, good luck with finding work, you do realise companies read these forums
Why have publicly addressed my complaint. I said that one company was bent and also addressed that it was how I saw it not necessarily that of others. I also said that it wasn’t a illegal act. You should be more professional than to put that on the post. The person I reported keeps trying to start something which I’ve already apologised for. Ban me if you wish but I’ve not said anything that wasn’t true
leeyarnold:
In my opinion companies who run vehicles in poor condition fall under the bent catagory. That’s just how I categorise it.
Whittakers motors are not in the best condition mate did you not have a look round while you were there, you might have a bit of a surprise coming your way,
leeyarnold:
Sound like a trouble maker you robroy back off
Troublemaker ■■?
You came on a public forum and accused several companies of being bent , and you call someone else a troublemaker
Thanks for your report, I’ve read your posts now, good luck with finding work, you do realise companies read these forums
Why have publicly addressed my complaint. I said that one company was bent and also addressed that it was how I saw it not necessarily that of others. I also said that it wasn’t a illegal act. You should be more professional than to put that on the post. The person I reported keeps trying to start something which I’ve already apologised for. Ban me if you wish but I’ve not said anything that wasn’t true
You should be more professional than to put that on the post
leeyarnold:
Sound like a trouble maker you robroy back off
Troublemaker ■■?
You came on a public forum and accused several companies of being bent , and you call someone else a troublemaker
Thanks for your report, I’ve read your posts now, good luck with finding work, you do realise companies read these forums
Why have publicly addressed my complaint. I said that one company was bent and also addressed that it was how I saw it not necessarily that of others. I also said that it wasn’t a illegal act. You should be more professional than to put that on the post. The person I reported keeps trying to start something which I’ve already apologised for. Ban me if you wish but I’ve not said anything that wasn’t true
You should be more professional than to put that on the post
Irony?
It will be lost on him he will think it means pressing his pants
