dexxy57:
Can we take this so called ‘professor’ seriously though? He seems very uninformed.Not once does he mention the 4th Reich.
Bearing in mind that the EU Federalist 4th Reich agenda is to impose it’s stinking control freak dictatorship on Europe by stealth and obviously being on message with the plan,like all the rest of your lot,he obviously bleedin wouldn’t would he. 
On that note not once does he mention that the EU is an illegal,self appointed,undeclared,wannabee,De Jure,Federal superstate,masquerading on the world stage as though it is already an internationally recognised De Facto one,either.
You might like to see Dr Alice Weidel, chairperson ( ) of the AFD speaking about Brexit a few days ago.
This is what a stateswoman looks like when she means business.
youtube.com/watch?v=63IcW4eo4uM
Juddian:
You might like to see Dr Alice Weidel, chairperson ( ) of the AFD speaking about Brexit a few days ago.
This is what a stateswoman looks like when she means business.
youtube.com/watch?v=63IcW4eo4uM
This is her key point.She gets the difference between a Confederation of Sovereign STATES with the individual powers to consent or reject.
As opposed to a centralised Federal Super STATE.Although even she has missed the point of the powers of opt out or substitution in addition to VETO.Thereby also removing the Federalists excuse,that any particular state choosing to do its own thing,stops the others from doing what they want to do.
Bearing in mind that even some of her free market ideas are as bad as all the others’ and we voted for an end to free movement and EU race to the bottom single market laws which are decimating the UK road transport industry and general labour market.IE more protectionism not less.
youtube.com/watch?v=CNh3312dTtA 4.17 - 4.25
Which leaves the question why did Farage obviously prefer to distance UKIP from her and rule out the alternative of supporting a Confederal Europe.As opposed to him naively ( or not so naively 
) expecting the instinctively Federalist UK parliament to ever deliver Brexit.
Carryfast:
Juddian:
You might like to see Dr Alice Weidel, chairperson ( ) of the AFD speaking about Brexit a few days ago.
This is what a stateswoman looks like when she means business.
youtube.com/watch?v=63IcW4eo4uM
This is her key point.She gets the difference between a Confederation of Sovereign STATES with the individual powers to consent or reject.
As opposed to a centralised Federal Super STATE.Although even she has missed the point of the powers of opt out or substitution in addition to VETO.Thereby also removing the Federalists excuse,that any particular state choosing to do its own thing,stops the others from doing what they want to do.
Bearing in mind that even some of her free market ideas are as bad as all the others’ and we voted for an end to free movement and EU race to the bottom single market laws which are decimating the UK road transport industry and general labour market.IE more protectionism not less.
youtube.com/watch?v=CNh3312dTtA 4.17 - 4.25
Which leaves the question why did Farage obviously prefer to distance UKIP from her and rule out the alternative of supporting a Confederal Europe.As opposed to him naively ( or not so naively ) expecting the instinctively Federalist UK parliament to ever deliver Brexit.
Because even Farage wasn’t that stupid. He was not going to gain many votes in the UK if he publicly joined forces with the German Far Right.
Anything else you want explained?
dexxy57:
Carryfast:
This is her key point.She gets the difference between a Confederation of Sovereign STATES with the individual powers to consent or reject.
As opposed to a centralised Federal Super STATE.Although even she has missed the point of the powers of opt out or substitution in addition to VETO.Thereby also removing the Federalists excuse,that any particular state choosing to do its own thing,stops the others from doing what they want to do.
Bearing in mind that even some of her free market ideas are as bad as all the others’ and we voted for an end to free movement and EU race to the bottom single market laws which are decimating the UK road transport industry and general labour market.IE more protectionism not less.
youtube.com/watch?v=CNh3312dTtA 4.17 - 4.25
Which leaves the question why did Farage obviously prefer to distance UKIP from her and rule out the alternative of supporting a Confederal Europe.As opposed to him naively ( or not so naively ) expecting the instinctively Federalist UK parliament to ever deliver Brexit.
Because even Farage wasn’t that stupid. He was not going to gain many votes in the UK if he publicly joined forces with the German Far Right.
Anything else you want explained?
No surprise that a bunch of anti nation state extremists,hell bent on carrying out the dreams of numerous anti nation state pro centralised Federal Europe megalomaniacs and despots,from Napoleon to Stalin and Hitler to Tito,would try to paint their opposition as ‘far right’ or whatever the next typical Communist/Fascist type propaganda description your lot dream up next.
On that note the ‘far’ anything don’t generally call for the recognition of the right of self determination and the sanctity of Europe’s Nation States and the sovereignty and independence of their respective governments.Unlike and as opposed to dictatorial scum like Napoleon/Stalin/Hitler/Tito and now murderous pro euthanasia son of a ■■■■ collaborator Juncker.All with the same aim of wanting to stamp their centrakised despotic dictatorial authority across Europe.
As for Farage more like controlled opposition as would be expected of an enthusiastic servant of pro EU Thatcher.Anything else you want explained.
Juddian:
You might like to see Dr Alice Weidel, chairperson ( ) of the AFD speaking about Brexit a few days ago.
This is what a stateswoman looks like when she means business.
youtube.com/watch?v=63IcW4eo4uM
Careful - Mogg got slagged off for even hinting at any suppport for this democratically elected 94-seat strong party leader.
With a bit of luck, by the end of this year - we’ll be slagging off everyone Left of Ghengis Khan rather than everyone Right of Karl Marx.
“Dr” Alice Weidel - talks sense.
What she does NOT do is any kind of Hate Speech.
…And yet she still gets talked of as if she and her party were pushing for Gas Chambers, Higher Taxes, and Brownshirt-like activity against the dead ■■■■■■■■■■ worshippers… 
dexxy57:
Carryfast:
Juddian:
You might like to see Dr Alice Weidel, chairperson ( ) of the AFD speaking about Brexit a few days ago.
This is what a stateswoman looks like when she means business.
youtube.com/watch?v=63IcW4eo4uM
This is her key point.She gets the difference between a Confederation of Sovereign STATES with the individual powers to consent or reject.
As opposed to a centralised Federal Super STATE.Although even she has missed the point of the powers of opt out or substitution in addition to VETO.Thereby also removing the Federalists excuse,that any particular state choosing to do its own thing,stops the others from doing what they want to do.
Bearing in mind that even some of her free market ideas are as bad as all the others’ and we voted for an end to free movement and EU race to the bottom single market laws which are decimating the UK road transport industry and general labour market.IE more protectionism not less.
youtube.com/watch?v=CNh3312dTtA 4.17 - 4.25
Which leaves the question why did Farage obviously prefer to distance UKIP from her and rule out the alternative of supporting a Confederal Europe.As opposed to him naively ( or not so naively ) expecting the instinctively Federalist UK parliament to ever deliver Brexit.
Because even Farage wasn’t that stupid. He was not going to gain many votes in the UK if he publicly joined forces with the German Far Right.
Anything else you want explained?
We can have a Far Left Irish National Party cluttering up our elections, and another Far Left Scottish national party cluttering up our Parliament, and a Far Left Green Party cluttering up our seaside towns and utility bills - and a Far Left Labour leader cluttering up our bicycle sheds - then what objection can anyone have to a Right leader of a 94-seat strong party that happens to be the official opposition now in Germany?
Just try saying “Right” without prefixing it with “Far” as the political narrative demands of us sheep. 
It is often said the “Far” Right - stops the Right in general from being elected.
In that case, we now understand why the Far Left cannot get Corbyn elected even with 40% of the popular vote.
I would imagine Poroshenko in Ukraine - is about to wipe the floor with “funnyman” run-off opponent - who is only there to get soundly beaten in the run-off now.
“If something happens in politics that gives advantage to one side or the other - then you can be assured that it was contrived to be exactly that way BY the poltiicians”.
Carryfast:
dexxy57:
Carryfast:
This is her key point.She gets the difference between a Confederation of Sovereign STATES with the individual powers to consent or reject.
As opposed to a centralised Federal Super STATE.Although even she has missed the point of the powers of opt out or substitution in addition to VETO.Thereby also removing the Federalists excuse,that any particular state choosing to do its own thing,stops the others from doing what they want to do.
Bearing in mind that even some of her free market ideas are as bad as all the others’ and we voted for an end to free movement and EU race to the bottom single market laws which are decimating the UK road transport industry and general labour market.IE more protectionism not less.
youtube.com/watch?v=CNh3312dTtA 4.17 - 4.25
Which leaves the question why did Farage obviously prefer to distance UKIP from her and rule out the alternative of supporting a Confederal Europe.As opposed to him naively ( or not so naively ) expecting the instinctively Federalist UK parliament to ever deliver Brexit.
Because even Farage wasn’t that stupid. He was not going to gain many votes in the UK if he publicly joined forces with the German Far Right.
Anything else you want explained?
No surprise that a bunch of anti nation state extremists,hell bent on carrying out the dreams of numerous anti nation state pro centralised Federal Europe megalomaniacs and despots,from Napoleon to Stalin and Hitler to Tito,would try to paint their opposition as ‘far right’ or whatever the next typical Communist/Fascist type propaganda description your lot dream up next.
On that note the ‘far’ anything don’t generally call for the recognition of the right of self determination and the sanctity of Europe’s Nation States and the sovereignty and independence of their respective governments.Unlike and as opposed to dictatorial scum like Napoleon/Stalin/Hitler/Tito and now murderous pro euthanasia son of a ■■■■ collaborator Juncker.All with the same aim of wanting to stamp their centrakised despotic dictatorial authority across Europe.
As for Farage more like controlled opposition as would be expected of an enthusiastic servant of pro EU Thatcher.Anything else you want explained.
So there is no such thing as ‘Far Right’ political parties?
A different view from Germany, Michael Roth, Germany’s Europe Minister:
“90% of British Ministers had no idea how workers think, live, work, and behave…born with silver spoons in their mouths, who went to private schools and elite universities…” who has caused the mess but would suffer no consequences themselves…
The ‘i’ .
Sent from my SM-G361F using Tapatalk
Franglais:
A different view from Germany, Michael Roth, Germany’s Europe Minister:
“90% of British Ministers had no idea how workers think, live, work, and behave…born with silver spoons in their mouths, who went to private schools and elite universities…” who has caused the mess but would suffer no consequences themselves…
The ‘i’ .
Sent from my SM-G361F using Tapatalk
To be fair that could also be said of 90% of politicians across western Europe.
dexxy57:
Carryfast:
No surprise that a bunch of anti nation state extremists,hell bent on carrying out the dreams of numerous anti nation state pro centralised Federal Europe megalomaniacs and despots,from Napoleon to Stalin and Hitler to Tito,would try to paint their opposition as ‘far right’ or whatever the next typical Communist/Fascist type propaganda description your lot dream up next.
On that note the ‘far’ anything don’t generally call for the recognition of the right of self determination and the sanctity of Europe’s Nation States and the sovereignty and independence of their respective governments.Unlike and as opposed to dictatorial scum like Napoleon/Stalin/Hitler/Tito and now murderous pro euthanasia son of a ■■■■ collaborator Juncker.All with the same aim of wanting to stamp their centrakised despotic dictatorial authority across Europe.
As for Farage more like controlled opposition as would be expected of an enthusiastic servant of pro EU Thatcher.Anything else you want explained.
So there is no such thing as ‘Far Right’ political parties?
Define exactly what you are calling and mean by far right ?.
While suggest you read my post again closely.On that note Michael Collins was a Nationalist and by definition not far anything.
While Hitler managed to firstly hi jack the so called ‘Nationalist’ German vote.Which was a laughable contradiction anyway in a state born out of and based on anti nation state Federalism since Bismark hijacked the whole place in 1871.Crushing all the previous individual sovereign states that made up what became Germany in the process.Then went one better than Stalin by combining corporate Elitism with Socialism and Bismark style anti Nation State Federalism in the form of the 3rd Reich.
It’s bleedin clear that,like Collins,the AfD are Nationalists and therefore not far anything.By definition supporting the sovereign right of nation states to govern themselves independently with the right to agree or disagree and to all do their own thing as part of that.
While the so called ‘far left and far right’ are effectively the same thing and what both Hitler and Stalin tried to create in Europe.IE anti nation state centralised dictatorial rule in the form of the 3rd Reich and Soviet puppet regimes starting with their combined allied invasion of Poland.Which is the smoking gun which shows that it’s Socialism which is the key malignant force in both cases.
It’s equally clear that the EU is just another version of the USSR and 3rd Reich this time having learn’t that the best way of imposing yet another dictatorship on Europe is by stealth and subterfuge.The problem being that total scum like Juncker can’t hide their past or their intent.Make no mistake if you want to find the 'far anything it’s in the cold scheming vicious hearts of those like son of a ■■■■ euthaniser Juncker,not Collins or Wiedel,where you’ll find it.
If politicians recognize that they are indeed “Out-of-touch” - then they will boot the next election down the road until June 2022 in this country.
If they DON’T see their own Dorian Grey image looking back at them - then they’ll push for an early election, likely this summer - and get KILLED at the polls.
There are plenty of Labour voters who are yearning for Keir Starmer to boot Corbyn - but are growing in disappointment at “Why hasn’t he made his move yet?”
There are plenty of Tory voters who are yearning to see Graham Brady boot May - before she permits a bill to pass through the commons that not only scraps Brexit forever, but makes it illegal to continue being a “Brexiteer” to boot.
There are plenty of Libdem voters - who are not remainers.
There are plenty of Green voters - who will be voting tactically this next time around.
There are plenty of Students who DON’T support the loony left.
There are NEW students who are being discounted as “Liberal Leftists” - but are they?
If we think the pollsters “got it wrong” in the past - I reckon the next election is going to be the biggest upset in history!
I am thinking “six way split, biggest party has about 160 seats” scenario here.
The EU will LOVE that - “Nothing being done, zombie governments forever and ever amen”. 
The SNP stand to gain the most out of such a scenario - NOT UKIP, in case anyone thinks I am trying to bang the UKIP drum here.
Why? - Because five other parties will now have closer numbers to the SNP maximum of 59… Six parties with between 50 and 160 seats apiece.
MASSIVE gains in the EU parliament, which favours parties of this size in it’s PR/Elector voting system.
It is the EU itself that want to see “divisions in play” in this country, ‘ongoingly’ like Agency work in January…
Franglais:
A different view from Germany, Michael Roth, Germany’s Europe Minister:
“90% of British Ministers had no idea how workers think, live, work, and behave…born with silver spoons in their mouths, who went to private schools and elite universities…” who has caused the mess but would suffer no consequences themselves…
So now we’re supposed to believe that the EU is led by champions of the working class as opposed to university educated elites.
So exactly what electoral mandate has Roth got here giving the zb the supposed right to say anything concerning the internal affairs of this country ?.Possibly other than,like Tusk’s and Juncker’s fathers,a family history of having tried and failed to put it,like the rest of Europe,under German Federal rule in 1940.
Winseer:
If we think the pollsters “got it wrong” in the past - I reckon the next election is going to be the biggest upset in history!
If May gets away with turning/revoking Brexit according to the combined interests and wishes of her EU handlers,HM and the CIA,as seems a foregone conclusion,it’s obvious that rigging the next GE will be an essential part of that.Make no mistake we’re in some very serious zb here including US domestic and foreign policy ‘requirements’.In that successful secession in Europe creates the spectre,for the US government,of possible perceived successful secession in the US,such as encouragement for those calling for Texit.
Let alone the can of worms it opens up regarding HM’s actions in 1972 regarding assent to the European Communities Act and the hiding of FCO 30/1048 as part of that.IE who really hid it Heath or HM possibly based on the orders of the CIA and Nixon. 
Carryfast:
Winseer:
If we think the pollsters “got it wrong” in the past - I reckon the next election is going to be the biggest upset in history!
If May gets away with turning/revoking Brexit according to the combined interests and wishes of her EU handlers,HM and the CIA,as seems a foregone conclusion,it’s obvious that rigging the next GE will be an essential part of that.Make no mistake we’re in some very serious zb here including US domestic and foreign policy ‘requirements’.In that successful secession in Europe creates the spectre,for the US government,of possible perceived successful secession in the US,such as encouragement for those calling for Texit.
Let alone the can of worms it opens up regarding HM’s actions in 1972 regarding assent to the European Communities Act and the hiding of FCO 30/1048 as part of that.IE who really hid it Heath or HM possibly based on the orders of the CIA and Nixon.
You don’t half ramble. But then again most religious zealots do.
dexxy57:
But then again most religious zealots.
You mean like your hero Juncker attending a Catholic secondary school and joining the ‘Christian’ Social People’s Party.All to eventually use his powers to impose a policy of euthanasia overruling his head of state to do it.Thereby showing his true colours regarding the sanctity of life and obviously nothing to do with the church he’d obviously infiltrated to get into a position of power.It seems you have no issues with religious zealotry just so long as it’s the church of satan that the zealots in question are working for.Just like his ■■■■ father wore Gott Mit Uns as part of his uniform.But satanic hypocrisy and Federalism in all its forms always go together.
Carryfast:
dexxy57:
Carryfast:
No surprise that a bunch of anti nation state extremists,hell bent on carrying out the dreams of numerous anti nation state pro centralised Federal Europe megalomaniacs and despots,from Napoleon to Stalin and Hitler to Tito,would try to paint their opposition as ‘far right’ or whatever the next typical Communist/Fascist type propaganda description your lot dream up next.
On that note the ‘far’ anything don’t generally call for the recognition of the right of self determination and the sanctity of Europe’s Nation States and the sovereignty and independence of their respective governments.Unlike and as opposed to dictatorial scum like Napoleon/Stalin/Hitler/Tito and now murderous pro euthanasia son of a ■■■■ collaborator Juncker.All with the same aim of wanting to stamp their centrakised despotic dictatorial authority across Europe.
As for Farage more like controlled opposition as would be expected of an enthusiastic servant of pro EU Thatcher.Anything else you want explained.
So there is no such thing as ‘Far Right’ political parties?
Define exactly what you are calling and mean by far right ?.
While suggest you read my post again closely.On that note Michael Collins was a Nationalist and by definition not far anything.
While Hitler managed to firstly hi jack the so called ‘Nationalist’ German vote.Which was a laughable contradiction anyway in a state born out of and based on anti nation state Federalism since Bismark hijacked the whole place in 1871.Crushing all the previous individual sovereign states that made up what became Germany in the process.Then went one better than Stalin by combining corporate Elitism with Socialism and Bismark style anti Nation State Federalism in the form of the 3rd Reich.
It’s bleedin clear that,like Collins,the AfD are Nationalists and therefore not far anything.By definition supporting the sovereign right of nation states to govern themselves independently with the right to agree or disagree and to all do their own thing as part of that.
While the so called ‘far left and far right’ are effectively the same thing and what both Hitler and Stalin tried to create in Europe.IE anti nation state centralised dictatorial rule in the form of the 3rd Reich and Soviet puppet regimes starting with their combined allied invasion of Poland.Which is the smoking gun which shows that it’s Socialism which is the key malignant force in both cases.
It’s equally clear that the EU is just another version of the USSR and 3rd Reich this time having learn’t that the best way of imposing yet another dictatorship on Europe is by stealth and subterfuge.The problem being that total scum like Juncker can’t hide their past or their intent.Make no mistake if you want to find the 'far anything it’s in the cold scheming vicious hearts of those like son of a ■■■■ euthaniser Juncker,not Collins or Wiedel,where you’ll find it.
History lessons were never this much fun when I was in school.
Carryfast:
Franglais:
A different view from Germany, Michael Roth, Germany’s Europe Minister:
“90% of British Ministers had no idea how workers think, live, work, and behave…born with silver spoons in their mouths, who went to private schools and elite universities…” who has caused the mess but would suffer no consequences themselves…
So now we’re supposed to believe that the EU is led by champions of the working class as opposed to university educated elites.
So exactly what electoral mandate has Roth got here giving the zb the supposed right to say anything concerning the internal affairs of this country ?.Possibly other than,like Tusk’s and Juncker’s fathers,a family history of having tried and failed to put it,like the rest of Europe,under German Federal rule in 1940.
He’s got as much right to comment on this country as you have to comment on his. Grow up.
Carryfast:
dexxy57:
But then again most religious zealots.
You mean like your hero Juncker attending a Catholic secondary school and joining the ‘Christian’ Social People’s Party.All to eventually use his powers to impose a policy of euthanasia overruling his head of state to do it.Thereby showing his true colours regarding the sanctity of life and obviously nothing to do with the church he’d obviously infiltrated to get into a position of power.It seems you have no issues with religious zealotry just so long as it’s the church of satan that the zealots in question are working for.Just like his ■■■■ father wore Gott Mit Uns as part of his uniform.But satanic hypocrisy and Federalism in all its forms always go together.
Have faith brother. God will smite this evil 4th Reich.
dexxy57:
Carryfast:
Franglais:
A different view from Germany, Michael Roth, Germany’s Europe Minister:
“90% of British Ministers had no idea how workers think, live, work, and behave…born with silver spoons in their mouths, who went to private schools and elite universities…” who has caused the mess but would suffer no consequences themselves…
So now we’re supposed to believe that the EU is led by champions of the working class as opposed to university educated elites.
So exactly what electoral mandate has Roth got here giving the zb the supposed right to say anything concerning the internal affairs of this country ?.Possibly other than,like Tusk’s and Juncker’s fathers,a family history of having tried and failed to put it,like the rest of Europe,under German Federal rule in 1940.
He’s got as much right to comment on this country as you have to comment on his. Grow up.
I thought we were ‘commenting’ on the EU 4th Reich not ‘Germany’.Personally I don’t give a zb what Germany does within Germany just so long a they keep it within their own borders.Which they’ve obviously historically had a problem with.
While we only ‘commented’ on ‘his’ country when Germany decided that it would be a good idea to extend German Federalism across Europe.Including the British Isles in 1940.Oh wait.