Harry Monk:
Notimetoulouse:
Didnt neil armstrong totally deck a guy that got in his face about “not going to the moon”
also check out vintage space on you tube very informative bite size peices of knowledgeBuzz Aldrin.
99% of the time I’m against any form of violence.
Buzz Aldrin shows why nothing is 100%.
Sent from my GT-S7275R using Tapatalk
Russia and China say they couldn’t do it today with all the advances in technology but the Americans supposedly did so several times between 1969 and 1972 when you needed a mainframe the size of the Amazon rainforest to facilitate the computing power of an iPhone… and have chosen never to go back since.
Not for me, Jeff.
Why would anyone want to go back ■■? KFC is still waiting on DHL to deliver …
Why would Russia go along with it during the Cold War?
GasGas:
This is the real reason the lunar landings stopped:youtube.com/watch?v=PtBy_ppG4hY
Just too expensive.
Great song and great artist. 
Although since when have those in power really worried about spending vast amounts of money on vanity projects, while a large percentage of the population live in poverty?
GasGas:
Yes, the moon landings seem incredible to us: largely because we are so hampered by ‘tech’ that it’s impossible for us to do anything like that today.But then, Concorde seems incredible for its time also…look at its CRUISING speed and compare that to the top speed of military aircraft today.
And at an altitude nearly twice as high as most commercial aircraft fly at these days and all done while the passengers were sitting in normal clothes, eating the finest foods and wine. 
There’s a mirror on the moon, it’s used to measure the distance of the Moon from Earth
you fire a laser at the mirror and time how long it takes to reflect back, you know the speed of light, you know the time taken, speed equals distance divided by time therefore you can accurately calculate the distance.
It was placed at a precise angle by NASA astronauts and tested before they returned to Earth and it’s still being used by scientists today
It may also be used by little green women to do their lippy and mascara but I doubt that bit.
bigdave789:
There’s a mirror on the moon, it’s used to measure the distance of the Moon from Earth
you fire a laser at the mirror and time how long it takes to reflect back, you know the speed of light, you know the time taken, speed equals distance divided by time therefore you can accurately calculate the distance.
It was placed at a precise angle by NASA astronauts and tested before they returned to Earth and it’s still being used by scientists today
It may also be used by little green women to do their lippy and mascara but I doubt that bit.
But if NASA and the US goverment faked the landings, can you really beleive their mirror on the moon story. 
PS. This in no way means I either a believer or denier of the Moon Landings, I have an open mind and won’t swing either way (lined that up for Dipper Dave’s entrance (and that sounds even more of an invitation ) until I have the irrefutable evidence in front of me and even then I’d still be a bit wary just in case the irrefutable evidence has been faked.
They may well have landed on the moon but I don’t for one minute believe that they could have got back off it though. Surely the legs of the spaceship would stick into the cheese?
the maoster:
They may well have landed on the moon but I don’t for one minute believe that they could have got back off it though. Surely the legs of the spaceship would stick into the cheese?
Silly boy…it was hard cheese!
cav551:
Where’s Carryfast? he must have an opinion on this.
Blimey now that you’ve all done the easy bit of getting 450 hp from an AEC V8 
maybe you,railstaff,ERF and Anorak can now explain how aircraft wings and fuselage and tail section,all cut through massive structural steel beams under the load of holding up a sky scraper,like a knife through butter. 
youtube.com/watch?v=GyL9Q2xPmhU
As opposed to a coordinated Chinese cruise missile attack ‘warning shot’ on the basis of put up or shut up and America chose shut up ( surrender ).The damage limitation exercise being CGI and not even that in the case of the Pentagon and let’s blame the Arabs for it ?. 
youtube.com/watch?v=AzFqXbfv_yg
youtube.com/watch?v=XHKkzuU2qtE
While even as a believer in the moon landings at the time I’m now left with pondering the questions.How the aluminium tin can making up the Appollo space craft shielded the crew from the Van Allen radiation belt.Or even normal cosmic radiation in the case of that and the lunar lander.
Or how the modules,let alone a fabric space suit,can do that and stand up to the pressure differential of the virtually perfect vacuum of space outside v whatever inside without expanding uncontrollably then exploding.Also where was the lunar rover car stowed ?.
Let’s just say that I’d rather listen to Biking’s view on all that. 
It would be awesome if they did another landing with the cameras we’ve got today, or even if they landed and took off again without stepping out on the lunar surface if it’s too dangerous to open the doors!
Just a fly past would be awesome wed see a lot more than the footage we have from back then.
They did it back in 69 with the computer memory of a game boy and look at the computers we have of today
manalishi:
Read John Hamers.The Falsification Of History for a more forensic analysis of the moon landings and much more besides including the uss Liberty false flag,Lusitania sinking all bankster,mossad,c.I.a projects.
Yes thanks I’ve seen this book on amazon I might have to get it now, I’ve just bought a book called dark moon apollo and the whistle blowers that I need to find time to read
muckles:
GasGas:
Yes, the moon landings seem incredible to us: largely because we are so hampered by ‘tech’ that it’s impossible for us to do anything like that today.But then, Concorde seems incredible for its time also…look at its CRUISING speed and compare that to the top speed of military aircraft today.
And at an altitude nearly twice as high as most commercial aircraft fly at these days and all done while the passengers were sitting in normal clothes, eating the finest foods and wine.
Yes, I recall one of the first Concorde pilots recounting how on his first trans-Atlantic flight, he heard air-traffic control telling a NASA U2 high altitude research aircraft to get out of the way. He turned to his first officer and said" “There’s an American in a space suit ahead of us thinking he’s pushing the boundaries, and you and are are sitting here in collar and tie, at the same height, flying at four times the speed and 90 paying passengers are sipping Champagne behind us.”
Moon landing deniers are in the same box as flat earthers. The stupid box.
Once saw a quote from a flat earth organisation “we have members all around the globe”!
I rest my case.
robroy:
GasGas:
And people used to drive Leyland Marathons to the Middle East, and (even more incredible) back again!On a side note mate, Leyland Marathons were luxury (and if ■■■■■■■ powered well capable of getting there and back again) compared to some of the earlier M.East trucks, AECs, Seddons, and Atki Borderers for eg…not sure any made it to the moon though.
A London bus managed to make it tho’ and it must have been true because there was a colour photo of it in the Sunday Sport
The Sarge:
Moon landing deniers are in the same box as flat earthers. The stupid box.
Surely being open minded is brighter than calling anyone,putting forward a different theory or questioning what they’ve been told,a ‘denier’.
Having been contacted by the FBI, MI6 and DFS and been warned about my earlier comment regarding the ‘forgotten Camera’ as it was a bit too close to the truth I have decided to come clean and ignore their threats so as to debunk this moon landing footage once and for all.
What actually happened was the astronaut in charge of photography made the slight schoolboy error of taking his gloves off to operate the camera equipment and was swiftly sucked off and perished soon after.
In their rush to provide footage for reasons of ‘cold war propeganda’, a Hollywood studio was tasked to come up with something sharpish.
I have in my possession one of the stills that ended up on the cutting room floor due to a ‘Major Clanger’ being visible. Ironically Major Clanger was also the name of the astronaut tasked with photography in the first place.
Mazzer2:
A London bus managed to make it tho’ and it must have been true because there was a colour photo of it in the Sunday Sport
Absolutely.It was fitted with the well known one off AEC rocket engine which produced more power than the Saturn 5 and all from the same size as a 590 diesel engine and was launched from the front yard of Southall in total secrecy early one morning by all accounts driven by Stan Butler with Jack as conductor and Blakey running mission control at Chiswick garage.Although some say it could be heard as far as Kingston but AEC’s representative said the noise they heard was actually just a VC10 taking off at Heathrow.
Shortly followed by the Irish attempt piloted by Spike Milligan.
Dipper_Dave:
Having been contacted by the FBI, MI6 and DFS and been warned about my earlier comment regarding the ‘forgotten Camera’ as it was a bit too close to the truth I have decided to come clean and ignore their threats so as to debunk this moon landing footage once and for all.What actually happened was the astronaut in charge of photography made the slight schoolboy error of taking his gloves off to operate the camera equipment and was swiftly sucked off and perished soon after.
In their rush to provide footage for reasons of ‘cold war propeganda’, a Hollywood studio was tasked to come up with something sharpish.
I have in my possession one of the stills that ended up on the cutting room floor due to a ‘Major Clanger’ being visible. Ironically Major Clanger was also the name of the astronaut tasked with photography in the first place.
Love it
Great sense of humour