http://stobartwhistleblower.tumblr.com
I’ll just put this here for the Stobart haters.
Seen this earlier surprised were not on page 2
Only skimmed through it, but it would seem to appear that they’re in more than a spot of bother
Top dollar lawyers will spout a load of BS result slapped hand and carry on
crikey thev"e sure got the claws out for them havent they
Private prosecution? Surely if there was any substance to it there would be a criminal prosecution?
Reading the “articles” it seems to be a barrack room lawyer. I doubt anything will actually come of it…
The Sarge:
Private prosecution? Surely if there was any substance to it there would be a criminal prosecution?
Reading the “articles” it seems to be a barrack room lawyer. I doubt anything will actually come of it…
Exactly. Private prosecutions are normally brought by people with a chip on their shoulder. I doubt its worrying them in any way. Maybe Mr Paul The DCPC is Illegal and only a Directive is representing the prosecution
Just crack on drivers it’s none of your business really
PaulNowak:
Only skimmed through it, but it would seem to appear that they’re in more than a spot of bother
+1
If you do a bit of research you’ll find that somebody is bring court cases all over the place, claiming that Andrew Tinkler and William Stobart have been up to all sorts of dodgy dealings, but as all the cases are Civil cases I think it has more do to with him having a grudge than any real evidence.
Anybody noticed the date at the bottom of the link?
SWEDISH BLUE:
Anybody noticed the date at the bottom of the link?
Today’s date?
SWEDISH BLUE:
Anybody noticed the date at the bottom of the link?
The date on the top article is today!
The Sarge:
Private prosecution? Surely if there was any substance to it there would be a criminal prosecution?
Reading the “articles” it seems to be a barrack room lawyer. I doubt anything will actually come of it…
Err - you can bring a criminal prosecution privately. What normally happens in such cases is the CPS take it over and either run with it or drop the charges. The specific charges mentioned - i.e. Fraud, Attempted Fraud and Perjury are all criminal matters. “Private Prosecution” is not the same as “Civil Action”.
Either way, it looks like ■■■■■■■■ to me.
Ex-driver/shareholder with a grudge and a legal dictionary is all. Oh, and an average grasp of the English language too - seems to think that stating “obviously” makes it a fact
None of our business really. It would be nice to see all the directors get done in though.
FH Hammy:
None of our business really. It would be nice to see all the directors get done in though.
Can’t argue with that
Surely if it is an ex employee with a grudge you cant put all over the net without some basis of truth or fact behind it all?.
Does make for interesting reading if it it true and all the directors will get thier come uppance if the CPS or SFO run with it.
That Tinkler fellow looks like a crafty bugger, I’d be amazed if anyone managed to put one in him.
I’d just like to know when they offically renamed a grass into a “whistleblower” ?