Legal action against think accounting

I paid think accounting £23 a week for their SO CALLED BOOK KEEPING SERVICES That’s £1196 a year

Plus they then stole £2,100 of my VAT money

So the fess I paid were just £3,296

So with around 2,500 drivers on their books they were on £5 or £6 million a year

Bet its all disappeared now and they will fold before refunding a single penny

New Wave Accounting Ltd ( same people same address ) as they are now called will try and say not responsible for the actions Think Accounting

If you look at the new director he was director with Lee Wilson ( man behind Think ) 4 or 5 years ago

So its the same set up just a different ltd co name

It stinks

If a Ltd company folds up after a scam you should be able to take action against the director directly

cheers

Simon

latest entry at companies house

what does this mean

ftp://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/image/ … 446570.pdf

cheers

sbhep:
they then stole £2,100 of my VAT money

Is that £2100 of vat monies accrued by your company, or £2100 of HMRC’s money that you collected (or should’ve done & paid to them) on their behalf?
Or is there a more complicated breakdown of vat money they “stole”
Such as 50/50 for the small business flat rate scheme ie: £1050 each for your company and HMRC.

Tbh I never saw the vat monies as “mine”, but more as monies I collected on behalf of my company and HMRC.

I know think accounting are getting pelters at the moment but the principle of going skint every year and knocking the tax man,vat man and their employees or clients is nothing new. In fact it is almost a given practice in the utilities sector where the utility companies have driven the rates down so low that subbies go as long as they can then go skint knocking as I say the vat man, the tax man and employees than rise like a phoenix from the flames the next day as a new limited liability company still carrying out the work for the utility companies.
Another example of how Joe public subsidises big business and nothing is done by the government of the day.

Remember always that we still live in a nil-sum economy.

If ANYONE tries to push you into some deal that they say verbally is “better for you” (but strangely, never outline exactly why in writing…) then always suspect that the deal is in fact better for someone, anyone other than you, but you’re expected to remain in the dark as to the exact reason why.

Getting explanations in writing and proper guarantees in writing - means more today than it ever has. Insist upon it before agreeing to any changesa to T&Cs, contracts, etc. that might otherwise be thrust your way. :bulb:

sbhep:
what does this mean

ftp://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/image/ … 446570.pdf

cheers

It’s exactly what it says
3 months from 26/5 the company will officially be struck off the list and will be dissolved

OVLOV JAY:
When you think of what a good accountant will charge just to sign you off, when you do your own books, what do you seriously think you’re getting for £15 a week?

A good accountant will charge you about £300-£500 when you do your own books if you present them and receipts/invoices tidily instead of just handing him a couple of carrier bags over.

Pay peanuts get monkeys

The problem is you’re not paying peanuts. £15 a week is seriously overcharging.

Sorry pierre it was the 10% of the VAT that they did not have to hand over to HMRC as I was on the flat rate scheme where you don’t claim your vat back on the purchases, charge 20% but only pay 10% to HMRC.

So in a nutshell they must owe a shed load of money to hmrc and not be paying hence the notice to be struck off

So I guess there is little point in legal action

and the note at the bottom any assets go to the crown !!!

cheers

Simon

Conor:

OVLOV JAY:
When you think of what a good accountant will charge just to sign you off, when you do your own books, what do you seriously think you’re getting for £15 a week?

A good accountant will charge you about £300-£500 when you do your own books if you present them and receipts/invoices tidily instead of just handing him a couple of carrier bags over.

Pay peanuts get monkeys

The problem is you’re not paying peanuts. £15 a week is seriously overcharging.

I was looking from the point of view paying for a complete service. Most s/e drivers pay that fee every week so they can carry on living life like a paye driver. Remember, 99% won’t even be writing out an invoice. They want the same level of input as the md of a blue chip, and they pay a finance director a tidy sum. There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and it looks like think have made off with hmrc’s money, knowing the directors of these companies are ultimately liable

sbhep:
So I guess there is little point in legal action

and the note at the bottom any assets go to the crown !!!

I guess there’s no point in flogging a dead horse … It has ceased to be…

OVLOV JAY:
Most s/e drivers pay that fee every week so they can carry on living life like a paye driver.

That’s where the S/E drivers went wrong IMO, most went into it blindly without enough knowledge to operate & monitor the financial side of their business, after being pushed into it by agencies with ideas of making extra money, or they where too lazy to even try to do it all. Effectively being PAYE with the perks & without the effort

Any further developments on the Think Accounting rip off? Anyone received their bill yet or even settled their bill with HMRC ? Anyone used Think for a long period of time and not heard from HMRC ?

update regarding THINK being struck off and closed down.
FAILED !!!
somebody has objected and they are still active.
so the battle carries on.

But ultimately …
You’ll also fail leaving you with a potential bill from the solicitor

sunbeam:
i have documented evidence from hmrc that over 2000 companies/individuals etc have been caught out.

sunbeam:
somebody has objected and they are still active.

Now that’s a hell of a surprise. Who could possibly object? :unamused:

surprised. not really,
but it wasn’t me.
guess it was hmrc or one of the other 2000 plus companies involved.

So Sunbeam, out of curiosity …how much will the solicitors fees (as in yours) be when this class action reaches the end & eventually fails??
As I doubt that Jeremy Garside will work for free, and he’ll need to be paid by someone, to fund his lifestyle, and as costs will probably not be awarded in his/your favour now that think are still trading. So he’ll obviously turn to those next down the line for payment for his services … His clients (You and the others).
Then no doubt HMRC will be knocking on your door demanding settlement of tax bills

I hate to say I told you so… But as a former HMRC employee I warned of this right at the beginning. :unamused: :unamused:

My son’s father in law who was an accountant told me not to touch these schemes years ago, and to stick to P.A.Y.E, he said the tax man would not stand avoidance schemes like that for long, and they can come after you for the last SIX YEARS taxes. I did consider self employed at the time but it was all just too much trouble.

peirre:
So Sunbeam, out of curiosity …how much will the solicitors fees (as in yours) be when this class action reaches the end & eventually fails??

Have HMRC’s costs been awarded to you as well?

Stanley Knife:
Have HMRC’s costs been awarded to you as well?

I’m one of those rare “fools” who steered clear of think (and the likes), doing my own accounting/bookkeeping. So it maybe some time before HMRC come to my door, especially as there’s at least 2000 others ahead of me in the queue …