mucker85:
kr79:
From what has been alleged these under 16 girls had ■■■ with jimmy savile against there will that’s wrong if you don’t agree with that statement you are condoning child ■■■■.
In the Megan stammers case if they had ■■■ even with her consent she is still a minor and even if they spent there time away playing tiddlywinks the teacher has abused his position of trust.
yep, that about sums it up.
Some of my work involves school runs and trips out with kids. Even an allegation of something indecent or inappropriate happening between me and one of the girls that I am entrusted with would see my CRB being suspended immediately and probably me loosing my job.
I have had a couple of girls offer themselves to me but the reality is it wouldn’t be worth it.
It’s strange once they turn 16 they loose interest in me and the naughtiness of what they wanted.
In the Megan Stammers case there is no evidence of any under age ■■■■■■ relationship whatsoever.Which is probably why he’s not been arrested under any warrant for that type of charge.He’s actually been arrested for ‘abduction’ which is obviously not exactly what happened considering that she’s old enough to know wether or not she wanted to be with him.By all accounts the warrant is binding so he can’t be charged with anything other than that.
As for the age of consent as it applied in that case it seems a grey area as to wether at that point the French age of consent rules would have applied not the British one in just the same way that driving at 180 mph on an unlimited German autobahn doesn’t get anyone nicked for exceeding the British 70 mph speed limit and bearing in mind that the British age of consent was lower than it is now not that long ago anyway.So maybe it would be a good idea to harmonise it with the French one to stop the issue of couples running to France just a couples used to elope to Gretna to take advantage of different Scottish marriage laws.
Added to that is the issue of too many people allowing their judgement to be clouded by ever changing societal values and views,related to the age gap being seen (wrongly) as the relevant issue,not the age and in which the goal posts change like the weather to the point of them now wanting one law being applied in the case of blokes over 18 dating and marrying under 18 girls and another for blokes under that age doing exactly the same thing. 
The only issues which I’ve got with the Megan Stammers case is that her morals seem to reflect the situation of the type of family life which she’s grown up in.There’s (should be) a big difference between a girl of 15 going for a single middle aged bloke and him taking up the offer,subject to the age of consent being complied with,just the same as if it was a bloke of her own age that she’d chosen.Compared to the case of a 15 year old girl running off to France with a married bloke,regardless of his age.No surprise that no one could care less about that issue all they’re interested in is the age issue and wanting to keep their options open in regards to the idea of marriage meaning for life.So in my view a plague on all their houses because it’s basically mostly a society made up of hypocrites. 
However why should society view,taking up an offer by a 15 year old girl,subject to the age of consent being complied with,as ‘inapropriate’ in view of the precedent set by loads of similar cases out there such as the example which I’ve posted which show that such a relationship is entirely legal 
. 
But what you seem to be describing is some sort of trap going on being set by those girls in order to just make trouble for any bloke who’s stupid enough to not know if he’s being offered the real thing,of a girl who’s really looking for a proper,decent,age gap relationship,compared to a girl who isn’t.On that basis the Megan Stammers case seems to be the latter of those considering that she hasn’t said anything publicly in support of the bloke and against her parents since he was arrested and maybe justice considering that it’s yet again the scenario of a married bloke looking for,and obviously thought that he’d got,another chance with a single girl.
But you can bet that most of the conductors had more chance of getting a date with more,if not all,of them than I ever did.That’s a lot of the problem in that Jimmy Saville is being judged,on what was considered as nothing unusual at that time,by the pc standards of today.Although obviously nothing changes in that like jobs it’s always been easier to get another bird if they’ve already got one especially if they’re married as the Megan Stammers case shows.But I wouldn’t turn down the chance of making an honest woman of her if she’d like to change her mind about that idea.