Jimmy Savile

OUT OF HOURS BULLY'S TRUCKSTOP BAR (INTERACTIVE)
201

Wheel Nut:
I thought the silly ■■■■■■■■ liked the US states :stuck_out_tongue:

Geoffrey you are a dangerous prick

US ‘States’ in the form of individual state laws which are the supreme law in the states where they apply yes but the federal idea no.

As for dangerous I don’t think it’s as harmful to apply some common sense to the way that these types of issues are dealt with.
The Savile case who knows because as lots of people have said here,not just me,those who might,or might not,have had a case to make him answer for left it all too late to bring him to justice for the alleged crimes.But hopefully all those implicated,who are still able to face trial,will be brought to answer for what is being alleged.

However the question still remains as to wether the agenda behind the Savile case is really related to just the age gap issue rather than what might or might not have happened all those years ago but which for some reason only now seem to have been raised :question: .

But one thing is for certain I’d have very serious reservations if I was a juror in the case of Jeremy Forrest in helping to send him down for one of the same type of charges as is being applied in the other far more serious case in the recent news.

It doesn’t take a genius to realise that there is absolutely no connection whatsoever in the type of circumstances regarding the two types of case.However that difference probably wouldn’t be recognised when it comes to how the defendants would be treated if/when they are put inside if they are found guilty of the charge/s against them.In one case that treatment would be understandable in the other it wouldn’t when his only real crime was stupidity of ridiculous proportions and adultery.I think that the fact that he won’t ever work again as a teacher and his marriage is probably over,if his wife has any sense,is probably enough punishment in his case.While,like the Savile case,the question remains as to wether it’s really more about the age gap issue,which is the real agenda behind the case. :bulb:

Although having said that if it really was a case of love (doubtful going by the girl’s silence since) sufficient to have made all that worth the trouble,then the age issue alone shouldn’t be enough to stop the relationship continuing,when the girl reaches the age of consent,at least according to previous legal precedent.The only result in that case should be the justified complaints by those like myself concerning the fact that it always seems to be the blokes who’ve had their chance in life to have a wife,being given another one by another single woman while,at least some,single blokes get none.But there’s not much point in anyone being in a relationship if both parties don’t love each other.

I can’t see anything dangerous about any of that.But indiscriminate witch hunts,concerning these types of issues, without differentiating between them all,according the the circumstances and without applying common sense,would be. :bulb:

202

I think he called you dangerous because you’re an old man with paedophillic tendencies

203

I’m sure Megan stammers ain’t missing much by not having no Geoffrey loving.
The reason people who are older and split up for whatever reason get a chance to have another relationship with someone else is other people are attracted to there looks and or personality. Obviously we don’t know what you look like unless you post a pic on the aka thread. This ain’t the be all and end all I can confirm from personal experince. But how you treat people and your general character does help a lot and from how you come across on here you don’t paint yourself in the best light.

204

Who’s Geoffrey? :open_mouth:

205

switchlogic:
I think he called you dangerous because you’re an old man with paedophillic tendencies

My thoughts exactly. Its Geoff thang I think.
Checkout Geoff the creepy grub.

youtube.com/watch?v=-XSB4sQG … re=related

206

Carryfasts real name is Geoff

207

NOW

THEN

NOW

THEN

208

bigvern1:
Who’s Geoffrey? :open_mouth:

Used to appear in Rainbow. Had the tendency to come down from upstairs with Bungle quite a lot.
Surely they’re not the same Geoffrey, are they?
:laughing:

209

Looking back rainbow was quite disturbing. Three of them in the same bed living with a single man was George just camp or female and why did they put pyjamas on for bed but appear with no clothes on?

210

Cos they were pumping each other. Simple really G…Er Kev! :laughing:

211

kr79:
Looking back rainbow was quite disturbing. Three of them in the same bed living with a single man was George just camp or female and why did they put pyjamas on for bed but appear with no clothes on?

They used to make “twangers” but Geoffrey always encouraged the “boys and girls to play with each others”.

212

Sooty may’ve been abused by Saville but has kept quiet…
And why did Sesame Streets’ Bert and Ernie always sleep together, with a picture above the bed of them hugging.

213

kr79:
I’m sure Megan stammers ain’t missing much by not having no Geoffrey loving.
The reason people who are older and split up for whatever reason get a chance to have another relationship with someone else is other people are attracted to there looks and or personality. Obviously we don’t know what you look like unless you post a pic on the aka thread. This ain’t the be all and end all I can confirm from personal experince. But how you treat people and your general character does help a lot and from how you come across on here you don’t paint yourself in the best light.

Really so a few posts on a forum and you think that gives you the right to judge me as a person and that the basic morals,that single blokes shouldn’t have to compete with married/divorced blokes,for young single girls,don’t apply in my case because,in your view,being that you’re absolutely perfect in every way,I’m an unter mensch not part of the human race. :unamused:

I don’t think that you’re a lot brighter than switchlogic in that case.Now just supposing that Jeremy Forrest agrees with you and I ‘was’ going to be one of the few jurors who stopped the majority verdict of child abduction in his case based on his defence that he’s a stupid adulterer but not a ■■■■■■■■■■.Until his brief read out that note justifying why he’s not an adulterer and that he’s got more right to have her,because he is perfect in every way,than the single bloke sitting in the jury who thinks he has,but who he thinks isn’t good enough for her. :unamused: :unamused: :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

214

According to the media Savile has also now been accused of fancying a bloke. :open_mouth: :laughing: :laughing:
Bearing in mind how many women seem to have been involved and not one of them actually ended up with an offer of marriage and in the family way maybe it can all be explained by the fact that he was just a ■■■■ who didn’t really like women at all.He just wanted to treat them like zb and upset them. :bulb: :unamused:

Now where’s that JCB.I think I can still drive and operate one. :smiling_imp: :laughing: :laughing:

215

I don’t pretend to be anywhere near perfect or intelligent infact I can be a total ■■■■ lots of the time but I’m not bitter about anything that’s how you come across.

216

kr79:
I don’t pretend to be anywhere near perfect or intelligent infact I can be a total ■■■■ lots of the time but I’m not bitter about anything that’s how you come across.

As,I’ve said,if I was bitter I wouldn’t be defending age gap relationships,at least those involving married/divorced blokes, I’d be supporting everyone else in getting the zb’s locked up retrospectively at least the ones who I’ve lost out to. :bulb: :unamused:

You’re right though you’re no where near intelligent considering the type of zb that you’ve been trowing my way. :unamused:

217

I’m glad we can agree on something. I wish I could be intelligent like you though.

218

Just been on the news that a gang of dyslexic parants have given Jimmy Sommerville a right kicking. :stuck_out_tongue:
Cliff

219

Carryfast:
You’re right though you’re no where near intelligent considering the type of zb that you’ve been trowing my way. :unamused:

Glass houses anyone? You’re one of those people that has a very high opinion of his own intelligence yet everyone else knows is a complete Muppet. Your posts are often an unreadable mess so you’re in no place to put others down.

220

switchlogic:

Carryfast:
You’re right though you’re no where near intelligent considering the type of zb that you’ve been trowing my way. :unamused:

Glass houses anyone? You’re one of those people that has a very high opinion of his own intelligence yet everyone else knows is a complete Muppet. Your posts are often an unreadable mess so you’re in no place to put others down.

For someone who seems so keen on protecting under 16 girls like Megan Stammers and Nicola Philpot from the attentions of blokes like Joe Philpot,Jeremy Forrest and me.It’s ironic that it turns out that it’s really a case of needing to protect under 16 girls like her and Nicola Philpot from the attentions of homosexuals like Savile not from heterosexual blokes like me,Jeremy Forrest,and Nicola Philpot’s husband Joe.Which just leaves that matter of single blokes should get the single girls to get one chance in life instead of married/divorced ones getting more chances. :imp: :unamused: