Could be legal but we would need far more detail about times, and about the rest you took before week 1 to be able to say. Certainly it is not automatically illegal to take two back-to-back 24 hour weekly rest periods.
Thank you Harry Monk for replay. So before week 1 I was off Mon-Tue (45h), then I worked for 5 days (Wed-Sun) and rest as I said in post earlier(24h Mon rest)
id be perfectly happy showing cards like that …no doubt someone else could pick holes in it as the entire law relating to it is a can of worms and open to different interpretations.if they did,id worry about it when i was getting a fine after losing the debate,but they look fine for me.the working on the sunday part may through it out a tad,but plenty of breaks,and plenty of time off.
I’d say that was legal then. Many drivers seem to be under the impression that you have to have a full rest every other weekend, you don’t, you have to have one every other fixed week which is not the same thing. You will of course have compensation to consider before the end of the third fixed week following each reduced rest.
The reduced weekly rest period on Monday of week 2 is used to reset the six 24 hour periods and does not need to be compensated for.
That’s what I thought.
Thanks for all your replays
assuming the week before week 1 was a 45 hour rest then yes, the 24 hour rest you take on monday of week 2 is basically null and void/not bothered about because you’re taking a full 45 at the end of the week. All it does is reset your 6 24 hour periods
Héraultais:
Tachograph, could you just clarify for a numpty like me why the reduced rests don’t need compensating for?
One does, the other doesn’t,
Each fixed week needs to have a weekly rest attached to it, if it’s a reduced weekly rest it needs compensation, when there’s more than 1 weekly rest in the same fixed week, then only one needs compensating to meet the regs requirements
Héraultais:
Tachograph, could you just clarify for a numpty like me why the reduced rests don’t need compensating for?
Legally you only need 1 weekly rest period for each week, in week 2 there are 2 weekly rest periods but it’s the regular 45 hour weekly rest period at the end of week 2 that will be used for that week.
Therefore the reduced weekly rest period on the Monday of week 2 is only being used to reset the six 24 hour periods and will not be counted as the weekly rest period for either week so doesn’t require compensation.
If you want to be a bit more precise about it, assuming that they cross over midnight Sunday either of the reduced weekly rest periods could be used for week 1, so the OP can compensate for whichever needs the least compensation.
Thanks for the clarification. For a moment I thought it was being said that no compensation is needed, which I couldn’t understand at all. As I would never work in a job that would require me to do reduced weekly rests, it isn’t something that I take any notice of. Every day is a school day LOL.