Is having sex classed as other work?

[chas]

The big Boss was in the office early this morning & while waiting for the kettle to boil he asked us all whether having ■■■ should count as other work.

He explained that his wife had been a bit frisky last night and he failed to get his usual amount of sound sleep. He posed the question of just how much of ■■■ was “work” and how much of it was “pleasure?”

Little Boss chimed in with 75-25% in favour of work .

The planner said it was 50-50 while my fellow driver responded with 25-75% in favor of pleasure, depending upon his state of intoxication at the time.

There being no consensus, the big Boss turned to me while I was making the coffee. What was MY opinion?

Without any hesitation, I responded, “Boss, it has to be 100% pleasure.”

The big Boss was surprised and, as you might guess, asked why.

“Well, it’s like this Boss, if there was any work involved, them other ■■■■■ would have me doing it for them.”

[karl86]

Having ■■■ is classed as being ■■■■■ lucky .

[raymundo]

Karl86:
Having ■■■ is classed as being (zb) lucky .

+1, ■■■ appeal, please give generously

[alamcculloch]

It would depend whether another person was involved or not,also if it took place on company premises.

[dave_the_renegade]

It depends on whether it’s mechanical…or not.

[smoggie89]

Poa could be used when it’s there turn

[toddy2]

My Mate (he is a bit direct) walked up to a girl in the pub & said “Do you fancy a shag?”

“Certainly not” she replied,

So then he said - “well, do you mind laying down while I have one?”

[tachograph]

Is having ■■■ classed as other work?

As long as it’s not multi-manning I don’t care what it’s classed as

[the_maoster]

tachograph:

Is having ■■■ classed as other work?

As long as it’s not multi-manning I don’t care what it’s classed as

Very good.

[big_roy]

if you are a ■■■■ star then it is definitely other work