From zero to test in 14 hours

So you can’t see that I did both tests, one after the other, within the same sort of time frame of lessons as the OP is talking about, without assessment drives, based on the schools experience of teaching driving skills, as logic??

I consider that I have shown full “logic” in making my point!!! The instructor is an experienced driver, he is confident he can take a beginner to cat C standard in the time frame specified, over 4 days not unusual, I personally would take his word over someone who’s licence is still wet!!!

skorpio:
So you can’t see that I did both tests, one after the other, within the same sort of time frame of lessons as the OP is talking about, without assessment drives, based on the schools experience of teaching driving skills, as logic??

I consider that I have shown full “logic” in making my point!!! The instructor is an experienced driver, he is confident he can take a beginner to cat C standard in the time frame specified, over 4 days not unusual, I personally would take his word over someone who’s licence is still wet!!!

Listen to you sweetie! :smiley:
I’ve got some magic beans if you’d like them, they grow into big fat money tree’s, yours for a bargain price of 1 million.
I personally guarantee that they will yield 10 times that. - Do you want to buy them? :open_mouth:

Well done on finding a good trainer mate, you were lucky!
And I don’t want to break it to you, but not everyone can be trusted on their word.
As if you choose to go through life like that, you are only setting yourself up for disappointment and heartache…

What’s the length I’ve held my licence got to do with anything pal? As the logic aspect is about trust…
But I researched my trainer, and passed both my class’s first time. (Not that it’s really relevant!)

Finally, i’m sure you argument will be of no solace to the many post posters on this forum who have taken a trainer at their word and been sadly let down. It costs nothing to research a trainer, and only a mug wouldn’t!!!

Our standard course is 16 hours inc test time. I would always aim to get the candidate to test standard by the 8 hour point. After that approx 1 hour for reversing. This leaves a further 5 hours hands on driving to master the test routes and gives me time to work on the mental side of taking the test. (The most important part)

Pass rates are a guide but actually irrelevant to your test.

It’s been said confidence is important. Replace important with CRUCIAL.

You will be fine Place 100% trust in what your trainer tells you. He knows how to get you through.

Good luck

NickW88:
Which training company have you gone with?

PSTT.

As far as going straight into Class 1 training is concerned I’m guessing it’s a balance between how confident you’re feelings vs how much of a hurry you’re in. It certainly would be good to get them done together as it seems a lot of places want you to have held your licence for so long, even if you’ve not actually used it (I know some want you to have used it too).

My other dilemma is whether to go for an artic or wag and drag for the Class 1. The school has advised that the latter is generally considered to be easier and as I want to max my chances of passing I think that’s what I’ll do. That was the same reasoning I used when electing for auto rather than manual. I’d be interested to hear anyone’s thoughts on these choices too.

Thanks everyone for your support and encouragement - this place is such a refuge and source of info. I take on board what everyone’s saying about confidence too. It took me ten years just to get to the point of going for it at all because of trepidation but now I’ve made the decision I’m pretty determined to make it work.

LGVTrainer:
You will be fine Place 100% trust in what your trainer tells you. He knows how to get you through.

Good luck

This is what I have been trying to get across, but there are those that consider they know better!!!

Evil8Beezle, if you knew me, you’d realise that I have seen one hell of a lot of life, judging by your posts, one hell of a lot more than you, I’ve been around a long time, and know who to trust and when to trust them.

I would also suggest before you start trying to belittle people you read the posting fully, at no stage did I suggest that researching trainers was no good, what I said was if the trainer considers he can get you through the test in the timescale quoted then why bother with an assessment??

My aim was to try and help the OP with his situation, nothing more, if you don’t like what I said, tough luck.

And as for your rather childish “magic beans” statement, one can only hope that given time you will grow up and learn about the real world.

My last posting on this thread, end of.

I only had 14hrs training for my class 2 and previous to that the biggest thing I had driven my my fiesta…crack on you’ll be fine.

skorpio:
Evil8Beezle, if you knew me, you’d realise that I have seen one hell of a lot of life, judging by your posts, one hell of a lot more than you, I’ve been around a long time, and know who to trust and when to trust them.

I would also suggest before you start trying to belittle people you read the posting fully, at no stage did I suggest that researching trainers was no good, what I said was if the trainer considers he can get you through the test in the timescale quoted then why bother with an assessment??

My aim was to try and help the OP with his situation, nothing more, if you don’t like what I said, tough luck.

And as for your rather childish “magic beans” statement, one can only hope that given time you will grow up and learn about the real world.

My last posting on this thread, end of.

Bovine Excrement pal! - You post was about the OP trusting someone they had never met, and whether you can work out whether they can be trusted is irrelevant, as I doubt you will be holding their hand will you? As for belittling people, I think you need to read back through your posts, as you started that game, not me! I’m also not the one making judgement about who knows more about life life am I? :wink:
As for what you actually said, it was that the OP shouldn’t worry about anything and just trust the trainer at his word, which amuses me greatly, as didn’t you also post this:

skorpio:
Is it me? 3 posters saying no problems with jobs out there, and ALL driving instructors !!! Am I really that cynical that this could be a sales ploy?? no never, nobody would do that would they■■?

Oh wait, yes you did. So you can’t trust everything a trainer tells you then? :open_mouth:

Storm off into the sunset in a strop then mate, it isn’t the first time on this forum is it? :smiley:
And as for why you had to delete a load of your previous posts, I can only hazard a guess…
Bit of a temper maybe?
But don’t listen to me, the ink on my licence is apparently still wet, so I clearly know nothing, and you know everything! :laughing:

For years we have operated on a course of 14 hours (plus test) - with much success as many forum members will testify.

The option of an assessment is available for those who want it to put their mind at rest. But with candidates coming from all over the UK this is not often taken up.

The difficulty with assessments, and I’ve mentioned this before, is that the trainer can see what you’re doing now and can compare that with what has to be achieved to pass the test. But there is no way of anyone knowing a) how quickly someone will learn and b) how much they will retain. But the assessment is a great way of putting someone at ease.

In some trainers’ cases the assessment is purely a selling tool eg “look how well you drive this truck” and “consider how comfortable you’re feeling” etc etc.

But, given the general appalling standards of training/training vehicles on offer, the candidate will often be well advised to visit as a minimum to try and judge the feel for what is on offer. The OP has done this and seems happy with what has been seen.

In response to ROG, I would respectfully point out that in the last month we’ve had a clean sheet on a 2 day course and a 1 fault pass on the same course.

Incidentally, the “clean sheet” tot up for 2015 exceeds 30. Not bad for 14 hour courses!! Some trainers don’t achieve that in a lifetime - no exaggeration.

Pete :laughing: :laughing:

If you have the ability and the confidence then you will do it, just remember though that not everyone is cut out to be a driver of lorries - not saying that applies to you but some people just get too nervous apparently.

I didn’t have an assessment with my trainer, I contacted them through faceache and they said they had a space the week after so I took it - crazy I know. I turned up having never being near the yard but everyone I had training me were really good, ex-training police officers and one of the directors who had years of driving experience. I started at 8am each morning and finished at 12 Mon to Thurs with my test being on Thursday. The lorry was an automatic so easy to drive and I’d never driven anything bigger than a car before getting behind the wheel but I knew as soon as I sat in that lorry that this was what I wanted to do.

Anyway I didn’t pass first time due to being really nervous, but with 2 more days (my choice to build my confidence) training I passed 2nd time on what turned out to be the worst day of the year down here!

Just waiting to do mod 4 cpc now.

Hope you enjoy it, I found it had a calming effect on me when I wasn’t actually sitting the test :slight_smile:

If Pete and his guys and gals can get me through my test then any moron could pass lol :smiley:

As you have obviously spent some time dredging back into archives from when you were still in school, I’ll reply merely to answer your accusations.

At what point does the OP say he’s never met the trainer?
You made the comment on me going through life trusting people!
My opinion on newly qualified drivers spouting advice remains the same, get some experience first.
On the subject of life, as I pointed out, I’ve been around a long time, can you say the same?
I stand by what I stated, why ■■■■ bout with an assessment when a qualified trainer considers he cn get the OP up to standrd in the specified time frame [something borne out by an LGV trainer]
That posting was in reference to the reportedly over abundance of jobs available, taking quotes out of context will almost always change what they appear to mean. [maybe you’re also training to be a politician]
I didn’t (and still don’t) consider that I “tormed off in a strop”, I merely considered that enough had been sad. You, by your actions {dredging the archives} felt otherwise?
I’ll tell you why I deleted a number of my posts, certain people were trying to use them against me in an attempt to gain in my employers eyes! That is all I will say on that matter.
My temper? Maybe you’ll meet me one day (nameplate is prominent on my truck) and realise how wrong that statement is. I learnt to control my temper many many years ago.

On that point, hope I’ve answered your concerns about me, I bear no grudges to anyone these days so will wish you a happy new year.

wanderingstar:

NickW88:
Which training company have you gone with?

PSTT.

As far as going straight into Class 1 training is concerned I’m guessing it’s a balance between how confident you’re feelings vs how much of a hurry you’re in. It certainly would be good to get them done together as it seems a lot of places want you to have held your licence for so long, even if you’ve not actually used it (I know some want you to have used it too).

My other dilemma is whether to go for an artic or wag and drag for the Class 1. The school has advised that the latter is generally considered to be easier and as I want to max my chances of passing I think that’s what I’ll do. That was the same reasoning I used when electing for auto rather than manual. I’d be interested to hear anyone’s thoughts on these choices too.

Thanks everyone for your support and encouragement - this place is such a refuge and source of info. I take on board what everyone’s saying about confidence too. It took me ten years just to get to the point of going for it at all because of trepidation but now I’ve made the decision I’m pretty determined to make it work.

I went straight to petes artic instead of wag and drag. My reasoning was that I’m guessing most class 1 jobs out there will be artic as apposed to wag and drag.
There’s quite a big difference between the size of cat c eurocargo PSTT uses for training compared to the artic and i did find the first 20 minutes rather daunting but as soon as we were moving out on the road I knew I’d made the right choice going for the artic.

I personally would do an assessment drive. Don’t want to sound negative but if you shell out and then you realise during training it’s not for you…
Dave

So it’s not you last posting on the thread and you want another round? OK

skorpio:
As you have obviously spent some time dredging back into archives from when you were still in school, I’ll reply merely to answer your accusations.

What’s the reference to me and school about? If not a did that I’m a pup wet behind the ears? Wrong!

skorpio:
At what point does the OP say he’s never met the trainer?

Not sure he had or hadn’t, just that the trainer told him 14 hours would be fine, yet the candidate had not done an assessment, so had no way of knowing if this was reasonable or not. This is the crutch of the matter, and you yourself have said, or rather admitted NOW that driving instructors cannot be be taken at their word, as they have their own motives which are not necessarily the same as the candidates. And that it what I disagreed with on your initial statement, as the instructor wants the business, and will tell the candidate what they want to hear, You basically said that the candidate should take the instructor at their word, end of! (Disclaimer: Not all instructors are dishonest, most I’m sure are not. But a little research should be able to suss this out…)

skorpio:
You made the comment on me going through life trusting people!

No I didn’t, I said that you may be able to work out whether you can trust a person. While at the same time basically calling me wet behind the ears. And if I’m wet behind the ears, due to the ink on my licence still being wet, wouldn’t the same also be true for the OP?
Which way do you want it pal? As you can’t have both…

skorpio:
My opinion on newly qualified drivers spouting advice remains the same, get some experience first.

What has my licence experience got to do with general advice about whether you can trust someone who would clearly be biased in getting business for their school? I’d say that’s a life experience thing, and by now you should have worked out I’m not wet behind the ears mate. I’ve been around, possibly more than you, as I’ve come into this industry after have careers in other industries. So there is a fair chance I’ve more experience in life than you, but I won’t claim that, as I’m not that condescending… But back to this point, which is what would I know about choosing a driving school, and on that point, possibly more than you as I’ve done it more recently than you, so my knowledge is fresher and more current!

skorpio:
On the subject of life, as I pointed out, I’ve been around a long time, can you say the same?

Oh YEAH baby! :grimacing: I spent many years works for a blue chip IT company, did a Mech Eng Degree, and before that worked on construction sites as a Site Engineer. (This is now my retirement career…)

skorpio:
I stand by what I stated, why ■■■■ bout with an assessment when a qualified trainer considers he cn get the OP up to standrd in the specified time frame [something borne out by an LGV trainer]

The main point I was disagreeing with was believing an instructor, who clearly would have his own motives. Which are unlikely to be inline with those of the candidate… Yes a lot of candidates can pass in 14 hours, (as I did) but there are others that need more training. So when the OP states concerns that they are unsure of this and haven’t had an assessment drive, alarm bells should start to ring. So the best course of action is to have an assessment drive, and if possible, do this with a few trainer to find one the candidate is comfortable with. I’ve seem plenty of posts on here where candidates have had a horrible time with an instructor, so are in no way prepared for the test, as they are nervous as hell. And fail! Not because they are incapable, but because they lack confidence, and nerves get the better of them. Additional to this, Pete Smythe regularly states that some candidates need more training than 14 hours, and some less, so assessment drives are advisable. It’s not a case of one size fits all, and the OP should get an assessment to accurately gauge this. So I view this as a disagreement that the instructor in question can get the OP to pass in 14 hours training, it’s just a guess! And without knowing the instructor in question, we don’t know that instructors motives… What do they charge for retests for a start? As from what I’ve seen here, this can (and has been used) as a good money spinner for some training schools. And again, as I’m a Newbie in this forum more than you, I probably know that better than you. So your condescension of me being wet behind the ears, fails you again…

skorpio:
That posting was in reference to the reportedly over abundance of jobs available, taking quotes out of context will almost always change what they appear to mean. [maybe you’re also training to be a politician]

It’s not out of context at all, as the issue is trust. You didn’t trust the driving instructor as they had their own motives, and exactly the same issues are in play here. No I wouldn’t make a good politician, as I don’t tell lies or spout ■■■■■■■■. But if you’re conceding that I’m better at the battle of words, I’ll take that as a compliment! :smiley:

skorpio:
I didn’t (and still don’t) consider that I “tormed off in a strop”, I merely considered that enough had been sad. You, by your actions {dredging the archives} felt otherwise?

You wanted the last word, and said so. I relied, and here we are again… As for me dredging the archives, I spent a few mins looking at your previous posts, so what? It’s called research pal, and exactly that I recommend to anyone in choosing a trainer, it’s sense and basic logic!

skorpio:
I’ll tell you why I deleted a number of my posts, certain people were trying to use them against me in an attempt to gain in my employers eyes! That is all I will say on that matter.

So you said something you regretted, and needed to moderate yourself. Day ya vu?

skorpio:
My temper? Maybe you’ll meet me one day (nameplate is prominent on my truck) and realise how wrong that statement is. I learnt to control my temper many many years ago.

That would be nice, but I’m concerned that you needed too moderate your temper in the first place.

skorpio:
On that point, hope I’ve answered your concerns about me, I bear no grudges to anyone these days so will wish you a happy new year.

Cool, happy New year to you, and I bear no grudges either. But just because my licence is still wet, it wasn’t wise to assume I was still wet behind the ears, and try to talk down to me on those grounds, it’s condescending!

I trained with psst just before xmas and passed cat c first time with 2 minors ! i stayed over so my training was split over 4 days which i thought was about right ! just listen to your trainer your be fine :slight_smile:

I’m training with PSTT in February and haven’t had an assessment but am really not concerned by that being confident in my driving ability, as far as I’m concerned they are teaching me to drive a truck up to test standard not to actually drive. Loving the keyboard warriors by the way :wink:

Can I make it clear that my motivation is exactly the same as the candidates. If someone fails we make no more profit from them as we’ve already had our bit from the course. We don’t keep coming back for another bite of the cherry. So failure is bad news for us. It’s demoralising for the instructor, causes planning issues for vehicles, takes up valued tests and is a general pain in the backside.

But let’s be honest. No trainer has 100% first time pass rate. So we build in provision to mitigate the above as part of our operational strategy.

But the aim, from the outset, is a first time pass from every candidate. And every effort is made to achieve this though it doesn’t always work straight away. This is what a great reputation is built on.

Yes, there are less professional trainers that will happily take money and not give a monkey’s as to the result. But there are plenty that are seriously interested in the outcome.

In response to an earlier comment

Pete Smythe regularly states that some candidates need more training than 14 hours, and some less, so assessment drives are advisable.

The fact is that most folks will pass on our 14 hour course. But it’s true that some will be an “only just”, the majority will pass comfortably and a tiny number will have had a couple of hours more training than they actually needed. But I make the point, again, that assessments are not an exact science. The nature of the job dictates this with there being so many variables. But my experience has shown that this is a fair and proper method of operating and I don’t intend to change any time soon.

At the risk of repeating myself, many of our candidates are from all over the UK and, with a few exceptions, don’t bother with an assessment. The main benefit of the assessment is to ensure that the candidate is comfy with the trainer, vehicle, set up. It has little to do with training duration. But anyone is welcome to have an assessment to put their mind at rest. We carry out in excess of 100 residential courses each year with huge success. Proof is in the pudding.

Has it never occurred to anybody that it’s more than a bit weird to “assess” someone on skills they have yet to be taught?

Maybe I should call it a “trial drive”.

Pete :laughing: :laughing:

Pete is correct in saying it’s not an assessment it’s a trial drive. Trainers are a strange breed It takes years even decades to understand this game. Pete is, in my mind the UK No1 trainer.

Assessments are a sales tool not a training tool please believe that. Personally we offer trial drives to meet future candidates and try to bury their fears.

We can’t guarantee success, we could if we could take the tests but we can’t.

Evil - Scorpio make peace boys. You have so much to offer on here. Newbies need positive words.

To get that pass needs a team effort. Candidate - Trainer - Examiner. Everyone wants the same thing

Good luck

I want all trainers to be good, and therefore all rouges to be out of business! :imp:
So I’ll always suggest a candidate to do their homework, as a good trainer has nothing to fear by that! :smiley:

I’d also go for a beer with skorpio, probably have a good crack as we are both strong characters! :grimacing:

Moonpigdan:

wanderingstar:

NickW88:
Which training company have you gone with?

I went straight to petes artic instead of wag and drag. My reasoning was that I’m guessing most class 1 jobs out there will be artic as apposed to wag and drag.
There’s quite a big difference between the size of cat c eurocargo PSTT uses for training compared to the artic and i did find the first 20 minutes rather daunting but as soon as we were moving out on the road I knew I’d made the right choice going for the artic.

I personally would do an assessment drive. Don’t want to sound negative but if you shell out and then you realise during training it’s not for you…
Dave

Thanks for that advice. A part of me wants to do that so it was useful to hear your experience.

Maybe a “trial drive” once you’ve got provisional CE will put that one to bed.

Pete :laughing: :laughing: