Ha, ha bloody ha really.
Buzzer:
Ha, ha bloody ha really.
You do know that HM actually signed us up to the European Communities Act with Heath. 
Carryfast:
Buzzer:
Ha, ha bloody ha really.You do know that HM actually signed us up to the European Communities Act with Heath.
And did you know CF that Heath thretened to close parliament if they did not go with him on entering this set-up.
HRS:
Carryfast:
Buzzer:
Ha, ha bloody ha really.You do know that HM actually signed us up to the European Communities Act with Heath.
And did you know CF that Heath thretened to close parliament if they did not go with him on entering this set-up.
But HM ( would have ) trumped Heath ‘if’ she’d have refused assent on grounds of Sovereignty/defence of the realm from foreign take over which is part of her remit/perogative.
Carryfast:
HRS:
Carryfast:
Buzzer:
Ha, ha bloody ha really.You do know that HM actually signed us up to the European Communities Act with Heath.
And did you know CF that Heath thretened to close parliament if they did not go with him on entering this set-up.
But HM ( would have ) trumped Heath ‘if’ she’d have refused assent on grounds of Sovereignty/defence of the realm from foreign take over which is part of her remit/perogative.
The Queen is a Constitutional Monarch. What part of that don’t you get?
dexxy57:
The Queen is a Constitutional Monarch. What part of that don’t you get?
The Queen is not a ‘Constitutional Monarch’ specifically regarding matters of sovereignty and defence of the realm from foreign takeover especially as in this case when that takeover is helped by a treasonous parliament gone rogue.Which part of that don’t you get.
Oh wait no surprise you don’t ‘get’ it because you don’t recognise this nation’s sovereignty,over the illegal non declared de Jure EU Federal zb pile to which you and those like you actually bear allegiance to.
Carryfast:
The Queen is not a ‘Constitutional Monarch’ specifically regarding matters of sovereignty and defence of the realm from foreign takeover especially as in this case when that takeover is helped by a treasonous parliament gone rogue.Which part of that don’t you get.Oh wait no surprise you don’t ‘get’ it because you don’t recognise this nation’s sovereignty,over the illegal non declared de Jure EU Federal zb pile to which you and those like you actually bear allegiance to.
She’s a Constitutional Monarch mate. The days of the Monarch having absolute power are long gone. Her weapons of choice these days are a pen and a rubber stamp.
Buzzer:
Just saying, Buzzer.
Fair enough. What point are you trying to make?
dexxy57:
She’s a Constitutional Monarch mate. The days of the Monarch having absolute power are long gone. Her weapons of choice these days are a pen and a rubber stamp.
The Monarch does have absolute power in the case of the defence of the realm from foreign takeover and ultimate command of the forces.If HM had refused assent to the European Communities Act on grounds of sovereignty and HM government having no right to delegate its authority to a foreign power,that would have been the end of the matter.The fact that she didn’t tells us all we need to know and that’s why we didn’t leave the EU in March and we won’t be leaving it in the Autumn either.‘Unless’ it’s a case of BRINO which obviously prevents the obvious implications,of her providing assent to any withdrawal act on grounds of sovereignty,thereby contradicting her previous assent to the European Communities Act.IE effectively an admission of dereliction of duty at best or treason at worse.
dexxy57:
Buzzer:
Just saying, Buzzer.Fair enough. What point are you trying to make?
Pretty obvious I would say, the caption says all you need to know about the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
Carryfast:
[The Monarch does have absolute power in the case of the defence of the realm from foreign takeover and ultimate command of the forces.If HM had refused assent to the European Communities Act on grounds of sovereignty and HM government having no right to delegate its authority to a foreign power,that would have been the end of the matter.The fact that she didn’t tells us all we need to know and that’s why we didn’t leave the EU in March and we won’t be leaving it in the Autumn either.‘Unless’ it’s a case of BRINO which obviously prevents the obvious implications,of her providing assent to any withdrawal act on grounds of sovereignty,thereby contradicting her previous assent to the European Communities Act.IE effectively an admission of dereliction of duty at best or treason at worse.
She is a Constitutional Monarch. Essentially, she does what she’s told. She rubber stamps Acts of Parliament (or puts a posh wax seal on them) and then gets back to her ceremonial duties.
Drag yourself (at the very least) forward into the 17th century.
Buzzer:
Pretty obvious I would say, the caption says all you need to know about the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
A bit harsh there Buzzer.
I’m not saying the BBC is perfect, but it’s not as biased as you think it is. Is it?
dexxy57:
She is a Constitutional Monarch. Essentially, she does what she’s told. She rubber stamps Acts of Parliament (or puts a posh wax seal on them) and then gets back to her ceremonial duties.
Drag yourself (at the very least) forward into the 17th century.
The Monarch has the power to refuse assent to any bill of parliament especially one which hands the country over to a foreign power.She also has the power to command the military to act against any such rogue parliament and even declare war against any such foreign power.The fact that instead she chose to sign us up to the European Communities Act says it all and that’s why we ain’t leaving the EU in March,or October or ever.
Buzzer:
dexxy57:
Buzzer:
Just saying, Buzzer.Fair enough. What point are you trying to make?
Pretty obvious I would say, the caption says all you need to know about the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
If you think the BBC is telling lies, then you must know what the truth really is.
So, what is your source of the truth, that you can judge these ‘BBC lies’ against?
Franglais:
Buzzer:
dexxy57:
Buzzer:
Just saying, Buzzer.Fair enough. What point are you trying to make?
Pretty obvious I would say, the caption says all you need to know about the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
If you think the BBC is telling lies, then you must know what the truth really is.
So, what is your source of the truth, that you can judge these ‘BBC lies’ against?
Just watch Have I Got News For You to see how bias the BBC are.
Why cant MPs see its the EU who dont want a deal.They have said any deal MUST include the backstop which parliment have voted against 3 times so Boris quite rightly said he wont consider a deal which includes the backstop because parliment dont want it and it wastes time . How many time did May get ridiculed trying to get the EU deal through only for it to be rejected due to the inclusion of the backstop . There is no deal to have but you cant blame Boris for that
ramone:
Just watch Have I Got News For You to see how bias the BBC are.
How are the views of a comedian, a journalist and various guests the view, biased or otherwise, of the BBC? I suppose you could say that it is BBC policymakers who choose those guests but could it be that the vast majority of the guests they have to choose from think that Johnson is a conning clown?
I have said it before but the backstop is there to protect Ireland, an EU member who does not want to leave the Union. Do you really think that they should betray Ireland just to get a deal with an always troublesome UK? Of course not, it would spell doom for the Union as all the other small countries would know that it could not be relied upon when push came to shove.
Also, it would be nice to know where you get your news from and explain how you know for sure that it isn’t biased. I am happy to declare my sources, BBC and Channel 4 in the main, but I do trawl elsewhere when I have the time and I see nothing in general which does not clash with commonsense.
Spardo:
ramone:
Just watch Have I Got News For You to see how bias the BBC are.How are the views of a comedian, a journalist and various guests the view, biased or otherwise, of the BBC? I suppose you could say that it is BBC policymakers who choose those guests but could it be that the vast majority of the guests they have to choose from think that Johnson is a conning clown?
I have said it before but the backstop is there to protect Ireland, an EU member who does not want to leave the Union. Do you really think that they should betray Ireland just to get a deal with an always troublesome UK? Of course not, it would spell doom for the Union as all the other small countries would know that it could not be relied upon when push came to shove.
Also, it would be nice to know where you get your news from and explain how you know for sure that it isn’t biased. I am happy to declare my sources, BBC and Channel 4 in the main, but I do trawl elsewhere when I have the time and I see nothing in general which does not clash with commonsense.
The backstop protecting Ireland from a troublesome UK ■■? Is that the same UK that bailed Ireland out not so long ago when they were on the verge of bankruptcy.
If the EU are so adamant that they want a border let them set it up and police it at a cost to them.
ramone:
Spardo:
ramone:
Just watch Have I Got News For You to see how bias the BBC are.How are the views of a comedian, a journalist and various guests the view, biased or otherwise, of the BBC? I suppose you could say that it is BBC policymakers who choose those guests but could it be that the vast majority of the guests they have to choose from think that Johnson is a conning clown?
I have said it before but the backstop is there to protect Ireland, an EU member who does not want to leave the Union. Do you really think that they should betray Ireland just to get a deal with an always troublesome UK? Of course not, it would spell doom for the Union as all the other small countries would know that it could not be relied upon when push came to shove.
Also, it would be nice to know where you get your news from and explain how you know for sure that it isn’t biased. I am happy to declare my sources, BBC and Channel 4 in the main, but I do trawl elsewhere when I have the time and I see nothing in general which does not clash with commonsense.
The backstop protecting Ireland from a troublesome UK ■■? Is that the same UK that bailed Ireland out not so long ago when they were on the verge of bankruptcy.
If the EU are so adamant that they want a border let them set it up and police it at a cost to them.
They don’t want a border, that’s the whole point. No wonder you think as you do if you don’t understand that simple fact.
Still don’t know what your super trusty news source is however, but if that is where it’s led you, say no more.
ramone:
Spardo:
ramone:
Just watch Have I Got News For You to see how bias the BBC are.How are the views of a comedian, a journalist and various guests the view, biased or otherwise, of the BBC? I suppose you could say that it is BBC policymakers who choose those guests but could it be that the vast majority of the guests they have to choose from think that Johnson is a conning clown?
I have said it before but the backstop is there to protect Ireland, an EU member who does not want to leave the Union. Do you really think that they should betray Ireland just to get a deal with an always troublesome UK? Of course not, it would spell doom for the Union as all the other small countries would know that it could not be relied upon when push came to shove.
Also, it would be nice to know where you get your news from and explain how you know for sure that it isn’t biased. I am happy to declare my sources, BBC and Channel 4 in the main, but I do trawl elsewhere when I have the time and I see nothing in general which does not clash with commonsense.
The backstop protecting Ireland from a troublesome UK ■■? Is that the same UK that bailed Ireland out not so long ago when they were on the verge of bankruptcy.
If the EU are so adamant that they want a border let them set it up and police it at a cost to them.
“UK bailed out Ireland”?
Do you mean in 2010 when the UK and other countries in the IMF loaned it monies to help it out of a financial crisis?
Those loans that will be repaid by next year?
The same IMF that loaned…bailed out…the UK in 1976?