Cummins

Trev_H:

ramone:

Trev_H:

ramone:

Saviem:
Well ramone, much as I love Mr ■■■■■■■■ the bits around his engines were not so great in “driver” terms.

If I were doing a hard shift, I must say that the 192hp F86, would be my choice. Quiet, warm, comfortable. No not a barn stormer, but whilst I watched the RR, or 205 drawn tail lights go away up the bank…well I would be listening to my radio, adjusting the heater controls, looking behind me in those big vibration free mirrors, and wriggling my bum on that comfortable cloth seat, (with that modest, but adequate little bunk behind me)!

And when I arrived…well, 22tons minimum payload, easy to manouver comfortable, not tired, and only minutes behind the “big power”, 205, 220, AV760, (sorry, he would be well behind…roaring along in some subterranean gear, on even a modest bank)!!!

Why did British lorry engineers never ever grasp, or even try to identify what it was like to actually try to earn a living from their wares■■?

But sadly the “cowboy”, in this elderley Farmer…well I would have been swopping cogs in gay abandon, like a frustrated TT racer…in my ■■■■■■■ 205, 10sp Fuller Atkinson!!!..and b…r the Radi
Cheerio for now.

So on a more level playing field put a 9 speed fuller behind the Rolls ■■■■■■■ Av760 Leyland etc all with similar power would 1 engine stand out or were they much the same?

At about the 220bhp mark they were all pretty even but when it came to hills one stood out ! the Roller, they were very good pullers and dropped little speed, the downside to this was they had a lower top speed than the rest, used a little more fuel and weren’t as reliable as the others, horses for courses I guess. I always thought the 680 Leyland or the 760 AEC’s were good all rounders.

That sounds more down to gearing Trev ,i had a Gardner 320 which romped up the hills but at 60 mph you were really pushing it .

They were geared just a little lower but I think they had to cut down the engine revs on them as well to slow head gasket and piston problems. What I do remember about 220 Rollers was the terrible throttle linkage which had an all or nothing feel to it and made the pump rack bounce which lead to awful kangaroo impressions, the 265, 280,290 rollers didn’t have those problems and were good motors and all very good pullers for their power output.

Well they went full circle when the auto Dafs came out with their fly by wire accelerators ,they were like an on off switch

RENÉE PILOT:

Bewick:

8LXBV8BRIAN:
The same spec Dennis ,as you say what a total miss-match of parts. think Waugh’s had 6 Atkis with this spec if i remember this one in the
photo had the large black 4 spoke seddon wheel as did ONL 428M which you ended up with they were the last two to come with no power steering
and the last 220 ■■■■■■■ engines .

This the beastie Bri !! this shot was taken after the old girl had finished work and had received a “makeover” and a well earned retirement,just kept as a pet then,I think this shot was taken at an Atki gathering at the Leyland Motors museum ?.The Atkis would have greatly enhanced the Leyland exhibits I guess! Cheers Dennis.

Hello Bewick.
Atkinson Borderer T3446C 4x2,chassis no.FC.26693,ONL 428M.
The enquiry is complete.
The vehicle details for ONL 482M are:
Date of Liability 01 04 1992
Date of First Registration 13 02 1974

The photograph was probably taken at the 1987 or 1988 Seddon Atkinson Gathering,at the British Commercial Vehicle Museum,at Leyland.
Is this Atkinson lorry still owned and preserved by you? Please.Is it still with us? I hope so :smiley:

RENÉE PILOT.

I bought the Atki,ONL482M,via a dealer pal,direct from Atkinsons service centre ex Club Street,Bamber Bridge just about 12 monthe after it’s first registration,apparently those weakling “pencil neckers” at Waughs couldnt turn the steering wheel !! Ah! Didums!! ( forgive me I’m dripping tears all over the key board,with laughter!) Anyhow,back to a “mans world”,The motor gave us excellent service and was still stood in the depot,in pristine condition,when I left the WRM group in later 1996.However,this was the state of the Atki in 2002 (I think?)buried in a stack of worn out casings in the depot ! Apparently,when WRM went out of business they put some batteries on the Old girl and it “fired up” on the button,I have no idea where it went or if it is still about,it would be nice to think it was,I could give the owner it’s full SP ! I’ve no idea what motor Larry is on about but it sure aint ONL482M as it was based at Milnthorpe from early 1975 until,at least,2002 !this is a shot of the Atki prior to it’s removal from the Milnthorpe depot in 2002. Cheers Bewick.

Bewick:

RENÉE PILOT:

Bewick:

8LXBV8BRIAN:
The same spec Dennis ,as you say what a total miss-match of parts. think Waugh’s had 6 Atkis with this spec if i remember this one in the
photo had the large black 4 spoke seddon wheel as did ONL 428M which you ended up with they were the last two to come with no power steering
and the last 220 ■■■■■■■ engines .

This the beastie Bri !! this shot was taken after the old girl had finished work and had received a “makeover” and a well earned retirement,just kept as a pet then,I think this shot was taken at an Atki gathering at the Leyland Motors museum ?.The Atkis would have greatly enhanced the Leyland exhibits I guess! Cheers Dennis.

Hello Bewick.
Atkinson Borderer T3446C 4x2,chassis no.FC.26693,ONL 428M.
The enquiry is complete.
The vehicle details for ONL 482M are:
Date of Liability 01 04 1992
Date of First Registration 13 02 1974

The photograph was probably taken at the 1987 or 1988 Seddon Atkinson Gathering,at the British Commercial Vehicle Museum,at Leyland.
Is this Atkinson lorry still owned and preserved by you? Please.Is it still with us? I hope so :smiley:

RENÉE PILOT.

I bought the Atki,ONL482M,via a dealer pal,direct from Atkinsons service centre ex Club Street,Bamber Bridge just about 12 monthe after it’s first registration,apparently those weakling “pencil neckers” at Waughs couldnt turn the steering wheel !! Ah! Didums!! ( forgive me I’m dripping tears all over the key board,with laughter!) Anyhow,back to a “mans world”,The motor gave us excellent service and was still stood in the depot,in pristine condition,when I left the WRM group in later 1996.However,this was the state of the Atki in 2002 (I think?)buried in a stack of worn out casings in the depot ! Apparently,when WRM went out of business they put some batteries on the Old girl and it “fired up” on the button,I have no idea where it went or if it is still about,it would be nice to think it was,I could give the owner it’s full SP ! I’ve no idea what motor Larry is on about but it sure aint ONL482M as it was based at Milnthorpe from early 1975 until,at least,2002 !this is a shot of the Atki prior to it’s removal from the Milnthorpe depot in 2002. Cheers Bewick.

Thats a shame Dennis ,what happened to the depot ,is it still there? Theres an article in this months Heritage Commercials about a company near Whitehaven who were taken over by BRS when everything was being nationalised ,it may be of interst to you

Funnily enough “ramone” the old depot is just standing empty and has been since WRM vacated it 10 years ago !I’ve no idea why,and care even less to be honest,I had 20 years operating from the site and the ammount of traffic that passed through during that time will never be repeated in to-days world of ■■■■-eyed “Logistics”,Cheers Dennis.

Bewick:
Funnily enough “ramone” the old depot is just standing empty and has been since WRM vacated it 10 years ago !I’ve no idea why,and care even less to be honest,I had 20 years operating from the site and the ammount of traffic that passed through during that time will never be repeated in to-days world of ■■■■-eyed “Logistics”,Cheers Dennis.

I`m supprised the developers havent taken it and built a housing estate there ,Henry Longs in Bradford as just given way to some college for our multi cultural friends down here

ramone:

Bewick:
Funnily enough “ramone” the old depot is just standing empty and has been since WRM vacated it 10 years ago !I’ve no idea why,and care even less to be honest,I had 20 years operating from the site and the ammount of traffic that passed through during that time will never be repeated in to-days world of ■■■■-eyed “Logistics”,Cheers Dennis.

I`m supprised the developers havent taken it and built a housing estate there ,Henry Longs in Bradford as just given way to some college for our multi cultural friends down here

It’s a 100% industrial area a mile away from Milnthorpe,in the middle of the country,I believe it belongs to the firm that bought the old Libby factory site next door,but it is stil a mystery why nothing has been done on the site ! Cheers Dennis.

Dennis it was just a thought Selby Mortons of Wooler had one which was ONL /// I just wondered if it was the same motor, I know they got it second hand & ran it on journey work for a while, Regards Larry.

Larry, selby mortons was ONL15M. There is a photo on Brian Edgars website public.fotki.com/Scottishtruckphotos/

ERF64cu1:

8LXBV8BRIAN:
Hold on to the B.H.P :unamused: :laughing: 200 TO 220 BHP so lets keep it down on the real level or the Mighty Manchester 8 cylinder legend will rule the thread :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: - :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
The 220 ■■■■■■■ with road ranger box was king for a day or to ,best put me hard hat on Kevmac47 will never let me live this post down :blush: :slight_smile: .

Brian i think its time you took MGW981L for a spin, you might change your mind about your beloved 8 cylinder legend!! :smiley: :smiley:

Sorry Ian some how i don’t think it would , not for me the Gardner 8 cylinder was the ruler of the road 1971/2 to 1978 :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: - :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

ERF64cu1:
Larry, selby mortons was ONL15M. There is a photo on Brian Edgars website public.fotki.com/Scottishtruckphotos/

I thought you must know summat I didn’t Larry!!But I suppose the suffix ONL was fairly common throughout the N.East eh! Anyhow,if everything that came out of your part of the world was as reliable as ONL482M it will dee for me marra !! That was just about the hardest worked Atki we operated,it wasn’t the favourite,some of the older ones had that accolade but they didn’t do the same double shift work as ONL,great motor,great times! Cheers Dennis.

ERF64cu1:
Larry, selby mortons was ONL15M. There is a photo on Brian Edgars website public.fotki.com/Scottishtruckphotos/

Thanks for that info, Regards Larry

8LXBV8BRIAN:

ERF64cu1:

8LXBV8BRIAN:
Hold on to the B.H.P :unamused: :laughing: 200 TO 220 BHP so lets keep it down on the real level or the Mighty Manchester 8 cylinder legend will rule the thread :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: - :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
The 220 ■■■■■■■ with road ranger box was king for a day or to ,best put me hard hat on Kevmac47 will never let me live this post down :blush: :slight_smile: .

Brian i think its time you took MGW981L for a spin, you might change your mind about your beloved 8 cylinder legend!! :smiley: :smiley:

Sorry Ian some how i don’t think it would , not for me the Gardner 8 cylinder was the ruler of the road 1971/2 to 1978 :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: - :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Brian you could be surprised!!! :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

ERF64cu1:

8LXBV8BRIAN:

ERF64cu1:

8LXBV8BRIAN:
Hold on to the B.H.P :unamused: :laughing: 200 TO 220 BHP so lets keep it down on the real level or the Mighty Manchester 8 cylinder legend will rule the thread :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: - :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
The 220 ■■■■■■■ with road ranger box was king for a day or to ,best put me hard hat on Kevmac47 will never let me live this post down :blush: :slight_smile: .

Brian i think its time you took MGW981L for a spin, you might change your mind about your beloved 8 cylinder legend!! :smiley: :smiley:

Sorry Ian some how i don’t think it would , not for me the Gardner 8 cylinder was the ruler of the road 1971/2 to 1978 :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: - :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Brian you could be surprised!!! :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Is this the ERF we are talking about here Ian :question:

We had an Atki Borderer OJM480L that had the ■■■■■■■ 220 /Fuller610/Eaton 2 speed,and it could eat 8LXB’s for breakfast,the 20 gears it had at it’s disposal probably helped,but the sour looks you got from the “Big” Gardner drivers was a sight to behold,if “Looks could kill” springs to mind !! Cheers Bewick.

Bewick:
We had an Atki Borderer OJM480L that had the ■■■■■■■ 220 /Fuller610/Eaton 2 speed,and it could eat 8LXB’s for breakfast,the 20 gears it had at it’s disposal probably helped,but the sour looks you got from the “Big” Gardner drivers was a sight to behold,if “Looks could kill” springs to mind !! Cheers Bewick.

Maybe Dennis,but you had to dig deeper into your pocket to find the £’s to fuel the beastie up,I remember Alex coming down to Manchester and giving us a pep talk on fuel economy when driving any of the ■■■■■■■■ powered units we had,which is one reason that when the ■■■■■■■■ engined units were retired from the fleet,they were replaced with the 240 Percies,predominantly ERF’s,as you say,happy days!!!

David :smiley: :smiley:

5thwheel:

Bewick:
We had an Atki Borderer OJM480L that had the ■■■■■■■ 220 /Fuller610/Eaton 2 speed,and it could eat 8LXB’s for breakfast,the 20 gears it had at it’s disposal probably helped,but the sour looks you got from the “Big” Gardner drivers was a sight to behold,if “Looks could kill” springs to mind !! Cheers Bewick.

Maybe Dennis,but you had to dig deeper into your pocket to find the £’s to fuel the beastie up,I remember Alex coming down to Manchester and giving us a pep talk on fuel economy when driving any of the ■■■■■■■■ powered units we had,which is one reason that when the ■■■■■■■■ engined units were retired from the fleet,they were replaced with the 240 Percies,predominantly ERF’s,as you say,happy days!!!

David :smiley: :smiley:

You are 100% correct David,however,I was only referring to the isolated instances when the Atki in question got the opertunity to show an 8LXB “a clean pair of heels” on the M/way grades.In the main we got a reasonable MPG from our ■■■■■■■ chassis,some better than others all depending upon the particular Driver.Also the DB 6speeds were not as economical as the Fuller 610 box.We probably did the same as SOM,in a far smaller way, when we replaced the ■■■■■■■ engine motors with both 6 & 8 LXB’s and later on a few 8LXC’s joined the fleet,the Gardners were,without doubt,the most economical motors during their era.However,in latter years the Scanias proved to be every bit as economical and they became the bulk of our fleet as the Gardners had,sadly,passed “their sell by” date.But anyway,no-one can take away the pleasure that was derived by being sat behind the wheel of our OJM 480L when it walked past an 8LXB or one of the early 240 bhp F88’s,“magic our Morris”!! Cheers Dennis.

Saviem was the Saviem only a V8 MAN as the MAN used the V10 which had some awesome grunt at 320 :laughing:
cheers Johnnie
[/quote]
Evening all, now Johnnie thereby hangs an interesting tale.

Saviems first suitor having been Henschel…a 25year deal…dead within 3years, as Henschel was gulped by our dear Daimler Benz friends.

Then came a chance alliance, MAN, who needed a premier cabin, and a viable lightweight range! A marriage in heaven, for the “new” Saviem, (Frances, Floriat, Somua,Renault, and Latil), well they needed a strong engineering partner.

But lets talk of the “top range” vehicles.

Saviem only used the 15.something V8, (which we all refered to as the 16litre…as our “friends” down in Lyon, had a spectacularily unsuccesful 12litre V8, then the (awfully good) 14.something ,later version)!

However our Limoge based engineers had tried Turbo, and aftercooling both the V8, and just a turbo on the V10. Ye Gods…they were real performers, the “soft” torque output of the V8 vanished…with a GV350 10speed splitter, the thing was like a Ferrari on steroids…think about a 17litre Fiat, plus about 50%. Way, way ahead of anything available in the 70s European market, probably, (and I quote our own internal documentation), 475 constant (DIN) HP.

As for the V10, well trials indicated in excess of 500hp potential, in a manageagable package, with a torque capacity far in excess of the GV350 synchro box, so trials were conducted with St Nazaire produced Eaton 12sp boxes. The 13302 double reduction axle could cope with the power in 4x2 form, but it was envisaged that the standard MAN/ Saviem double drive ZF arrangement would continue. (Although following the work with the liquidators of Perez et Raimond, the PRP Willeme “heavy hitter” range, there was talk about the Clark, Eaton Transmission combination being utilised).

In both cases we are talking about tractors with an unladen weight below 7tonnes as a 4x2, dual sleeper, twin tank, ready to go!

Some potential eh!!! Then came our forced marriage to dear old “lardy arsed” Berliet. And I like so many others, had to learn a new culture! Not bad…just new!

So what of Saviem /MAN,well a number of my colleagues went to Germany to work. There was a synergy between the companies that is hard to explain, but we, (that is the corporate we), got on. The design aims were the same…economic power, within a light weight package. Simplicity of design, economic operation, suitability for many markets, and ease of operation, for the owner, and vitally the driver! "If the man behind the wheel does not like it…well then it will never be succesfull to operate it)!!!

If only British engineers had followed that thought process!

I have often thought that had not the “crisis” with Berliet have happened, which forced our marriage, then when MAN foundered in the 80s, would MAN have found a willing suitor in the Regies, Saviem…and what a combination that would have made!!

Im away to the Bollinger, to dream of such wonderful vehicles…for tommorow all we can do is cut hedges, so wet, oh so wet, is our land! Cheerio for now.

What are the thoughts of the 14L 250 versus the 12.7L 220?
I have heard it said that there was little benefit from the 250 over a ‘good’ 220. On paper it is a much better engine. As the 220 is only a tweaked 205 to meet the power to weight requirement, the 250 has the larger capacity so should have more guts.
However, no one really sings its praises. It is a lot thirstier for no measurable improvement.
Any comments?
That of course leads on to the 240 with the turbo. Did that provide a significant improvement in torque and reduced fuel consumption?

Bewick:
We had an Atki Borderer OJM480L that had the ■■■■■■■ 220 /Fuller610/Eaton 2 speed,and it could eat 8LXB’s for breakfast,the 20 gears it had at it’s disposal probably helped,but the sour looks you got from the “Big” Gardner drivers was a sight to behold,if “Looks could kill” springs to mind !! Cheers Bewick.

What was the top speed of this 8lxb slaying machine Dennis :question: :slight_smile:

Five ■■■■■■■ V16 Gensets being removed, 3 x green newer and 2 grey older versions. I forget the power ratings…1900BHP at 1300 rpm IIRC

genoutsm.jpg

2gensm.jpg