Compensation on a split daily rest

Can compensation be taken on a split daily rest ?

2 hours of compensation required fron a reduced weekly rest.

3 hour break taken during the shift.

11 hours rest at end of shift.

Can this be a split daily rest of 3 + 9 with 2 hours of compensation?

I think the answer is yes but have I missed something ?

ROG:
Can compensation be taken on a split daily rest ?

2 hours of compensation required fron a reduced weekly rest.

3 hour break taken during the shift.

11 hours rest at end of shift.

Can this be a split daily rest of 3 + 9 with 2 hours of compensation?

I think the answer is yes but have I missed something ?

Don’t see why not. It simply has to be attached to another rest period of at least 9 hours.

Thank you :smiley:

yes you can, as long as you have a 9 hour reduced rest period available.

why are you asking this questions ROG?

Edit; im wrong it doesnt count towards the 9 hour reduced rest does it?

Lee G:
Edit; im wrong it doesnt count towards the 9 hour reduced rest does it?

Correct, it doesn’t.

Lee G:
why are you asking this questions ROG?

It’s probably been asked on another forum and he wants the answer so he can post it there, that’s what he usually does. :wink: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Coffeeholic:
It’s probably been asked on another forum and he wants the answer so he can post it there, that’s what he usually does. :wink: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Nope - just idle curiosity
Wasn’t sure if it could be done that way as there was nothing specific about it in the regs (not with doing a split) - I do now :smiley:

ROG:
Wasn’t sure if it could be done that way as there was nothing specific about it in the regs

Regs are very specific on the subject actually.

Coffeeholic:

ROG:
Wasn’t sure if it could be done that way as there was nothing specific about it in the regs

Regs are very specific on the subject actually.

Tagged onto a reduced 9 or a full 11, yes, but I was not 100% sure about it when a split was done

ROG:

Coffeeholic:

ROG:
Wasn’t sure if it could be done that way as there was nothing specific about it in the regs

Regs are very specific on the subject actually.

Tagged onto a reduced 9 or a full 11, yes, but I was not 100% sure about it when a split was done

Very specific still.

Article 8 (7). Any rest taken as compensation for a reduced weekly rest period shall be attached to another rest period of at least nine hours.

What could be more specific than that. It doesn’t say, shall be attached to another rest period of at least nine hours except where the nine hours is part of a split rest. :unamused: :unamused:

Coffeeholic:
What could be more specific than that. It doesn’t say, shall be attached to another rest period of at least nine hours except where the nine hours is part of a split rest.

I know so I ASSUMED that doing it to a split would be ok but you know what they say about ASSUMPTIONS :wink:

ROG:

Coffeeholic:
What could be more specific than that. It doesn’t say, shall be attached to another rest period of at least nine hours except where the nine hours is part of a split rest.

I know so I ASSUMED that doing it to a split would be ok but you know what they say about ASSUMPTIONS :wink:

It wasn’t an assumption. :stuck_out_tongue:

Coffeeholic:
It wasn’t an assumption.

NOT FOR YOU - IT WAS FOR ME

ROG:

Coffeeholic:
It wasn’t an assumption.

NOT FOR YOU - IT WAS FOR ME

Neither really, you made an assumption on something which was already clearly stated. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Coffeeholic:
you made an assumption

That’s what I said :laughing:

ROG:

Coffeeholic:
you made an assumption

That’s what I said :laughing:

I know, I felt this thread hadn’t gone round in circles enough yet. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Coffeeholic:
I know, I felt this thread hadn’t gone round in circles enough yet. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Is that an assumption? </devilish mode>

ROG:

Coffeeholic:
I know, I felt this thread hadn’t gone round in circles enough yet. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Is that an assumption? </devilish mode>

an assumption like that, would assume you are assuming :stuck_out_tongue:

ROG:

Coffeeholic:
I know, I felt this thread hadn’t gone round in circles enough yet. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Is that an assumption? </devilish mode>

No, it clearly states it was a feeling not an assumption. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

Coffeeholic:
No, it clearly states it was a feeling not an assumption. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:

was it an assumed feeling though? </more devilish mode>

I can see this being split by a mod :wink: and going to somewhere else but that is just an ASSUMPTION :wink: :wink: :laughing: :laughing: