Who tf cares mate…stick to the conversation in point.
Yeah we sure have …so tell ya what,….Let’s go down the ‘‘condensed nutshell’’ route on this one to save time.
1. The fact is Khan is a little sh who is grossly unpopular, as popular as the Labour govt in fact.
2.Trump has him completely sussed after cutting through the b/s and is not afraid to speak his mind….as ever.
3.You hate Trump and anything he says and does is wrong.
4.You are a beyond reason brainwashed deluded lefty who can not nor will not hear anything wrong about anybody or anything ‘‘lefty related '‘….. no matter how evident that wrongdoing or incompetence is.
5.I understand all of the above (especially point no 4)
OK.
So, trump is wrong to say that London is not a safe place.
It is (slightly) safer than it was when Khan took over as Mayor. It is about as safe as NY, but much safer than the US a whole.
There are no "no go " zones for Police in London. So trump is wrong there too.
You don’t like Khan? OK.
Londoners like Khan enough to have given him a 3.8pp increase in the election 2024.
Well let’s wait and see what the next election brings, even if Khan continues to appease his target voters…
You are the ‘‘Statman’’ ….is London an immigrant/moslem majority yet in terms of population?…..if so you are more than likely right, Khan is the ‘‘most popular’'after all.
Hhhmm… well, if the Mayor of London, does what Londoners want him to do? Maybe he will be re-elected, if he chooses to stand again?
Ah well, I see you are back on your old hobby horse again. If you ever got off of it?
Those who vote in London elections live in London and are either UK, or EU, or Commonwealth, citizens. There is no religious aspect to being eligible to vote.
If you lived in London, you could vote. You could make your feelings about Khan known through the ballot box. There is no minimum intelligence requirement.
In the 2021 census about 15% of Londoners were Moslem, about 40% Christian, and about 27% non religious. Religion in London - Wikipedia.
So yet again you deliberately feign misunderstanding because it either contradicts an official line or because you can not face the bleeding obvious….a bit like my you tube clips of Khan in fact.…..
So you deny (or refuse to accept more like,) that Labour’s target voters are predominately Moslem after their alienation of the indigenous working class aka their original target voters….which explains a lot of their 2 tier approach to justice.
You also deny or again refuse to accept that Khan is especially reliant on the Moslem vote, and that he is especially prone to a bit of racial/religious appeasement…
(Please ffs do not ask for proof or links, there are numerous on the political thread from airport thugs to Moslem r4pe gangs )
I would imagine that your state of brainwash and lefty stance will have you chomping at the bit to scream ‘racist’ at those points, well newsflash,.we all just expect it now as a matter of routine, we no longer care……so go ahead fill yer boots, you know you want to.
So here’s me turning the tables and quoting an official line that I agree with to make my (that) point.
There we have it! Probably easier just to say “shush child, “we” know better than you. You carry on working in factories whilst us grown ups decide what’s best for you”.
Obviously a lot more words used, but finally there’d be some honesty.
TACO trump is currently dropping some more tariffs.
Coffee, some fruit, beef (will that please consumers, but anger farmers?) are included.
Of course the dropping of tariffs to drop retail prices is an admission that tariffs put prices up for consumers, in spite of the lies from the hokey-cokey maestro in/out on/off tariff-chicken.
Meanwhile the Oct employment figures have gone AWOL.
Like so many who don’t like the data, he is trying to ignore it, and even more is trying to tell everyone that up is really down!
And of course it is all the fault of the pesky Democrats.
What Biden did may still be having an effect on the US economy, but the gathering of last month’s figures? Nah! Just bollox from the Whitehouse spin machine.
To be fair don’t know what the Krays and Richardson firms would have made of it all but obviously all made much more sense when bleedin LCC was London and Surrey was Surrey.
Even they and LCC knew that the River was an important border as to who ran what and where in both cases.
Yep.
How long until we hear that everything was much better when some misunderstood scallywags, who really loved their Mum, and were really just modern day Robin Hoods, made London the peaceful place it was back in the day?
How predictable….Do you mean like somebody subscribing and automatically believing a kind of ‘‘official line’’ instead of thinking things through for themselves?
Nah I can t think of anybody as gullible and naive as that on here.
That myth is…..well just that a myth,.I have read a lot of books on this subject from both their own perspectives and a few of their associates.
The Krays were ruthless and ‘ruled’ by fear of consequence.
The only ‘‘positives’’ were that the only more serious aspect of criminality in ‘‘their’’ area, only came from their direction , as every other criminal was sh scared to misbehave on their patch…..
So I suppose if there was ever a ‘positive’ side to it all it was the vigilante type element to it, which prevented and limited a lot of other crime in the area which actually worked irrespective of whether or not that was morally right or wrong.
Also the Police in those days actually prioritised on policing, and ‘woke’ was something you did in a morning,…….there was no interference from hand wringers and bleating bed wetters in those days.
…..
Nah I ain’t rising to the bait this time especially when your confidence out weighs your abilities.
