Busy Mr Trump

OUT OF HOURS BULLY'S TRUCKSTOP BAR (INTERACTIVE)
4306

Are you saying that there has been zero manipulation, or misrepresentation, or bad editing, of Starmer’s speeches in the foreign media?

The BBC’s bad editing choices were in a domestic UK broadcast, and did not stop him being elected.
It did not IMHO, misrepresent what his intentions were. It did put two parts of the speech adjacent when in fact they were separated by a lot of time.
His speech, as a whole , was a whining complaint about how the election was stolen from him. (All total bollox of course)

Has he suffered reputational damage?
Those who were fans of his probably still love him and admire him.
Those who disliked him before the Panorama piece probably don’t feel any different.

All a money grabbing scam, from a money grabbing scammer.

Not to mention the trump university, trump gold sneakers, trump watches etc.

4307

:joy::joy::joy::joy: the gift that keeps on giving, Franglais blindly following the rhetoric with his blinkers firmly in place :joy::joy:

1 Like
4308

Are you saying that there has been zero manipulation, or misrepresentation
Yes there has been misrepresentation and by none other than Starmer himself.

4309

Just about sums things up.

Not only that but him taking the focus off the perpetrator and on to ‘‘the victim’‘….note the inverted commas btw…..Trump will be loving this, he hates lefties.:grin:

The BBC has always been loosely speaking ‘‘corrupt’’ from a lefty perspective.

Media is an excellent proven propaganda source, the BBC do some good stuff admittedly, but their news and current affairs programmes are heavily biased… multi culturalism diversity bull crap for instance, their dramas push a woke agenda, even their football coverage has been infested with leftys and their views by the likes ofGary Lineker. Their science views are looked through a woke lefty lens, heavily biased environmental opinions, and of course their pro trans agenda informing us all that a ‘‘woman’‘ can have a meat and two veg, and I ain’t referring to Nigella Lawson’s cooking ingredients.:joy:

4310

Or if GBN deliberately corrupted a news item.:joy:

(Instead of telling the actual truth….or the ‘uncomfortable’ truth in his case.’’)

4311

https://fullfact.org/environment/renewable-energy-generation-farage/https://fullfact.org/online/gb-news-surgeon-covid-vaccines/

etc etc

1 Like
4312

‘Gang of Four’ hold firm on Epstein files vote amid Trump pressure

Updated / Saturday, 15 Nov 2025 10:16

US President Donald Trump speaks to members of press aboard Air Force One

US President Donald Trump speaks to members of press aboard Air Force One

Washington Correspondent

Lauren Boebert got the treatment this week. The Republican Congresswoman from Colorado is one of the most outspoken pro-Trump figures on Capitol Hill, her sometimes outlandish positions earning her a solid following among the MAGA base.

But when she was summoned to the White House on Wednesday, it was not for praise. It was to exert extraordinary pressure on her to change her vote on an issue that has grown increasingly sensitive for President Trump, the Epstein files.

According to reporting by CNN and others, Boebert was brought into the Situation Room, the most secure chamber in the White House, where military operations are overseen and national security matters discussed. Members of Congress, especially backbenchers, are rarely, if ever, admitted.

No one in Washington punditry this week could recall any precedent for a single House member being brought into the Situation Room for a briefing.

And what a briefing it appears to have been.

On the other side of the table sat Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Todd Blanche, Bondi’s deputy and formerly Donald Trump’s personal lawyer during the Stormy Daniels case.

Portrait of American financier Jeffrey Epstein (left) and real estate developer Donald Trump as they pose together at the Mar-a-Lago estate, Palm Beach, Florida, 1997. (Photo by Davidoff Studios/Getty Images)

Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump photographed together (file image)

Blanche had also been entrusted with an extraordinary mission earlier this summer: to interview Ghislaine Maxwell in prison to determine what she might say about Donald Trump’s relationship with her late partner in crime, Jeffrey Epstein.

This week, Maxwell was reported to be receiving favourable treatment in the low-security facility where she was transferred following that interview, a prison some have dubbed “Club Fed”. She is also reported to be preparing a request for President Trump to commute her sentence.

It was an unusually heavyweight delegation of Trump administration figures. Their mission: to persuade Boebert to remove her name from a discharge petition forcing a House vote on a bill to compel the release of the Epstein files

4313

He said he increased it because he only heard that Gary Winston Lineker wasn’t working there anymore so they should be cash rich

1 Like
4314

You’re probably more than half right.

trump is after money.
Suing for loss of reputation is based on how much someone’s reputation is worth to begin with. It should not be based on how rich the alleged guilty party is.

What value is there to the reputation of person who a jury found was a sex attacker, and is a convicted felon?

I half hope he does try to sue…
Love to see him be offered damages of one penny!

4315

Ironically I regard myself as a lefty.

But who would happily use the red star cap badge as target practice for an FN rifle preferably while it’s being worn by it’s red army owner.Just the same as a Bren gun v any German Socialist Workers Party despot.

4316

No one and nothing does manipulation and lying propaganda like zb Socialism and Socialists.

4317

Socialism is based on the unwavering belief that it and only it, can be right.

Then doing whatever it takes to impose that belief and will.

2 Likes
4318

And there we have again ‘The Paragon of virtue’’ the ‘‘Holier than thou’‘ judge of everyone…who is Franglais.:joy:

I fully hope he does sue and is succesful, if only to pi55 off the likes of you……

You conceited and condescending lefties seem to think you can do or say wtf you like.

Still every cloud, if he does sue he’ll be able to finance his new ballroom that you were getting your tampon in another knot about.:joy:

1 Like
4319

Couldn’t be arsed to read your links on GBN, bit I’m sure at the best it will be innacurate reporting and at the worst somebody doing some bad research prior to the bulletin…..I’m fairly confident there will be no sign of an absolute deliberate and purposeful corrupt attempt to put across deliberate fake news in order to achieve an agenda

Edit….just heard the news, the latest statement from some no mark Labour politician or another is that he reckons it’s a wait for it…

Surprise surprise…

‘ A FAR RIGHT conspiracy’‘ :joy::joy:… pity the BBC chairman wasnt black, he could have blamed a ‘‘racist’‘

Effin clowns the lot of em.:roll_eyes:

4320

This is getting very interesting, Mr Epstein seems to be giving Mr trump nightmares

4321

At least he’s got one thing right.

4322

It’s wacky Marjorie.. who cares :yawning_face: :rofl:

4323

Well …Yes…he is correct that Sadiq Khan is Mayor of London.

Are there areas of London where the Police do not go?
Try this from “a reputable news source” :wink:

Is London safe or dangerous? Last year there were 104 homicides…3 fewer than 2016, when Johnson was Mayor.

Is London safer than trump’s New York?
NY has about a two and half to three times higher murder rate than London.
And NY is less violent than many other US cities. Overall the US has over 5 times the UK intentional homicide rate. Homicide rate - Our World in Data

4324

:joy::joy: Yep the ONLY part he got right.

Got it :+1:

The self appointed apologist strikes again, the man who will hear no wrong about his beloved woke and liberal socialists, the man who makes Comical Ali look like John Pilger.:joy:

And ooh look he’s managed to shoehorn Johnson in again.:joy:

Ok you ve convinced me, the official line from Khan’s press office is Khan is a popular mayor, London is a great place to live….

Oh yeah and according to Khan diversity is thriving, and there are apparentlly no vile r4pe gangs in London …..and perish the thought none of the Pakistani/Moslem variety, and anybody who says there is are racist…….but even more so if he can manage to act all coy and try and steer the interviewer into using the words Moslem or Pakistsni….. you must have seen the viral vid.:joy:

And the more recent one…..try rhe second attempt .:roll_eyes:

A ghastly snivelling little sh weasel….with that trademark air of Lefty condescending superiority…..

Come to think of it you yourself (surprise surorise) have gone out of your way yourself in the past to tell us (provided with official source links needless to say)that there are just as many white non Moslem r4pe gangs in the UK.

No sh Sherlock :flushed_face:

So now you are comparing 2 countries one around 40 times larger than the other one and telling us the larger one has a bigger murder rate……who’d a’ thought it eh?

Any official link comparisons on the state of illegal immigration in those 2 countries? …..I can look for you myself if it would help.

:joy:

As ever shove your useful idiot status and official rhetoric straight up yer arse and ask a few indigenous Londoners if Khan is popular……you will find his popularity equates somewhere between Hitler and what’s his name…oh yeah..

.Starmer.:joy:

4325

We have had this conversation before.

The UK homicide rate is about 6 times that of the USA.

Not the absolute number of homicides.
2024 UK 570. USA 22,830.
FastStats - Homicide and Homicide in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics.