So when you say
You would like a list of all of the UK’s Imams and a critique on their teachings?
Or is this just a bit of “whataboutery” which would be employed no matter who is included or omitted in any examples?
I made mention to 2 very high profile, very dangerous convicted Muslim extreme hate preachers, so no I do not need anything else.
“Whataboutery”? You mean the both of them serving long prison sentences for their crimes?
And you throw in Ian Paisley, please don’t go into Ian Paisley’s wrong doings, I know about them and if I didn’t I do have Google,
So as usual, you chose to further my post by replying. In doing so you cherry picked and ignored in equal proportion oh and completely deviated off topic which was Muslim extreme hate preaches in old blighty.
Busy Mr Trump…
LOL he who has never sinned cast the first stone.
So your posts directly prior to my Hamza/ Choudary post, which you chose to develop, were directly relating to Busy Mr Trump? Bizarre!
No not ‘bizzare’…just ‘FRANGLAIS’.
1 Like
Which way?
um i dunno maybe to iran as you said
looks like ole trump was right again…
If Trump is right about anything, it is likely similar to a stopped clock being correct twice a day.
Do you really buy all the spin in that video?
“In 1936 the Arabs were offered 80% of the disputed territory and the Jews 20%, but the Arabs rejected the offer”.
Or in another way “the British told the Arabs that they must give away their land to some others, and they refused this offer”
That is not the Israelis offering land to Palestine. It is the British saying “Hey we are only taking away some of your land. Not all of it. Why are you upset?”
In 1947 the UN decided to give away some Arab lands to the Jews. The Jews accepted the offer. The Arabs didn’t. Quelle surprize!
Again that is not Israel offering land to Palestinians.
I cannot be arsed to watch the rest.
But if the presenter thinks the UN has a point and should be listened to, maybe he should address the latest sayings of the UN?
The ones where the UN repeatedly calls for Israel to move out of the illegally occupied Palestinian lands. And to allow food and supplies into Gaza.
Where’s that irony meter when you need it.
Oh Jeez…how I can relate to that one.
So do you take the video as presented as accurate?
Or do you see spin in it?
Or do you want to score some more petty points by posting emojies?
Nah…just like you mate, cba to watch it.
If I was interested in scoring petty points, I would have done…
In fact again,… . just like you.
Why do you even bother trying to ‘take me on’.
all proven fact
as has been pointed out many times
lol it was bugger all to do with the arabs it wasn’t their land. it was british land from the end of ww1before that it was jewish.
Again Palestine has never ever existed
again it was british land havent we learnt that yet.
you mean “you cant be arsed to watch” the bit where arrafat gave them the gaza strip removing every single trace of jewish history from their own land including graves and displacing 10,000s of their own people palestine used it as a base to attack israel.
more like dont have an argument against it so just dismiss it…
0/10 go back to the headmaster for more detention
I watched the first few minutes and commented on that. I found it full of spin.
But you feel able to comment, post emojies, score points, take the piss, without watching any of it? Quelle surprize!
And THAT is when I know I have got under your skin.
Oooh the frustration, oooh the drama.
Of course it was…just a bit of Kent really.
nope a part of germany denmark and the netherlands according to you
Yep.
The troll scores another little point ,and mounts his dung heap to crow about it.
Well done.
Ooh dear she’s really narked.…best watch those pearls pet .
If that was my intention (it wasn’t) it gives you an insight into what the rest of us have to constantly endure and put up with, from you.
‘Point scoring’ indeed.
Move on.
Wrong.
It was never British Land. It was a Mandate from the League of Nations to administer the land. ‘Two governing principles formed the core of the mandate system: non-annexation of the territory and its administration as a “sacred trust of civilisation” to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people" … who were Palastinian Arabs and composed the vast majority of the local population. The mandatory power’s obligations to the inhabitants of the territory were supervised by a third party: the League of Nations.’