Bulmer's in pre pack buy out

this released 23 jan in express parcel systems newsflash

23rd January
Bulmers Logistics enters ‘pre-pack’ administration

The global downturn has claimed its first high-profile victim of the new year, with Teesside container operator Bulmers Logistics forced into a ‘pre-pack’ administration, with a new company, Bulmers Transport — formed by the previous management team — taking over its “trade and assets” for an undisclosed sum.

Bulmers Logistics had been under pressure for some time, with the company hit badly by the fall in container volumes. It had already shed some 50 jobs before Christmas in a bid to cut costs, however, when its funder declined to provide continuing support, the firm was left with little option but to consider either a sale or administration. It eventually entered administration at 1600hrs on 21 January, with the assets sold five minutes later.

Although the company will be making some 50 staff redundant, cutting its fleet by 40 trucks and closing its Hull and Immingham offices, it saves more than 200 jobs, which will transfer to the new firm under TUPE. In addition, it says it will continue to service all its current locations directed from its Middlesbrough or Ipswich offices.

The managing director of Bulmers Transport, Jonathan Bulmer, says: “I am extremely pleased to be able to offer a secure future to the majority of our customers, staff and suppliers.”

Director Andrew Spence-Wolrich says that the move is not without pain for some of its creditors, but insists that this was the best possible outcome. He adds: “Jonathan Bulmer has invested a large amount of money in this. The reason he’s done that is because he’s a fighter and he doesn’t want to give up on a business he’s been running for the past 17 years.

“There’s also a 100% belief in his people.”

As yet, there is no indication of the size of Bulmers Logistics’ debt or the eventual dividend to creditors.

I Just hope that it works out all right for the ones who are left with a job, a hell of a fight for those getting paid off

trucknetuk.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=41532

still on the first page :confused:

Yet another phoenix company… leaving a nice trail of debt. This shouldn’t be allowed, but they’ll get an O license because they’re well known. You can’t compete with companies like these. Does the industry no good.

every body deserves a second change u never been given one

andy best:
every body deserves a second change u never been given one

The company has been in difficulty for some time as is stated in the press-release and all of the arrangements have been put in place to continue trading if the business had been viable then it would be fair to give them a chance to turn it around but this way they start a new company and start again with a clean sheet.

“Quote”
Director Andrew Spence-Wolrich says that the move is not without pain for some of its creditors, but insists that this was the best possible outcome. He adds: “Jonathan Bulmer has invested a large amount of money in this. The reason he’s done that is because he’s a fighter and he doesn’t want to give up on a business he’s been running for the past 17 years.

If Jonathan Bulmer has the money to put into this "New " company why didnt he use it to rescue the business he doesnt want to give up on ■■? :confused: :confused:

On this occasion no I dont think he should have another chance, if he had put the money into the old company to try to save it then it would have been good luck to him . :unamused: :unamused:

thats a very valid point you have made there webby and i agree with most of it, but will you please stop typing like a ************ 2 yr old!!!

I will say this once and once only, Bulmers have acted in a totally legal fashion, they have done nothing that is not allowed in law… any comments that claim otherwise will be removed.

The repurcusssions of their actions in this case on the owner drivers and small hauliers can be discussed, and opinions are allowed. but keep to the facts , not speculation.

As it stands a large number of drivers are getting paid this week, if Bulmers had closed that wouldnt have happened.

The unsecured creditors will probably end up get the mucky end of the stick- but that is, and has always been the world of transport. Its a hard business.

I think being stuck between a rock and a hard place Bulmers have taken the best option available to them as a company to try and keep going. Lets hope the new company tries to help those smaller enities that are going to take a hit from Bulmers Logistics going down.

Rikki-UK:
I will say this once and once only, Bulmers have acted in a totally legal fashion, they have done nothing that is not allowed in law… any comments that claim otherwise will be removed.

The repurcusssions of their actions in this case on the owner drivers and small hauliers can be discussed, and opinions are allowed. but keep to the facts , not speculation.

As it stands a large number of drivers are getting paid this week, if Bulmers had closed that wouldnt have happened.

The unsecured creditors will probably end up get the mucky end of the stick- but that is, and has always been the world of transport. Its a hard business.

I think being stuck between a rock and a hard place Bulmers have taken the best option available to them as a company to try and keep going. Lets hope the new company tries to help those smaller enities that are going to take a hit from Bulmers Logistics going down.

legal yes, but with moral and dignity…not a chance.

question for u humbug if you were jonny bulmer how would have gone about it

andy best:
question for u humbug if you were jonny bulmer how would have gone about it

perhaps i would have used the monies that were available to finance the ‘new’ company to support the ‘old’ one.
i’m just a driver andy, not a financial or legal expert who knows loopholes in the law/legislation that will probably mean that suppliers and their buisinesses will not recieve money owed,
perhaps in todays climate may mean they won’t survive.
by the way mate, you may think i’m bitter but i’m pleased that bulmers haven’t gone belly up resulting in even more job losses. i just can’t help feeling that it’s wrong to leave debts unpaid.

andy best:
question for u humbug if you were jonny bulmer how would have gone about it

Not wishing to see anyone out of work andy, but Bulmer didn`t seem to worry about the small hauliers working for the trailer/box operators that he was prepared to push aside to increase the size of his business ■■?

This manoeuvre may have been legal but its certainly not moral, and now one large unsuccessful business keeps going but what about those smaller companies and owner/drivers in the area struggling to make ends meet. During this recession there are going to be many companies that go bankrupt as the over-supply of haulage bites but keeping firms going is just going to cause rates to drop and more companies to go bust. The closure of a company this size may well of meant the saving of many others who would have been able to take up the slack and weather the storm. :question: :question:

Rikki-UK:
I will say this once and once only, Bulmers have acted in a totally legal fashion, they have done nothing that is not allowed in law… any comments that claim otherwise will be removed.

The repurcusssions of their actions in this case on the owner drivers and small hauliers can be discussed, and opinions are allowed. but keep to the facts , not speculation.

As it stands a large number of drivers are getting paid this week, if Bulmers had closed that wouldnt have happened.

The unsecured creditors will probably end up get the mucky end of the stick- but that is, and has always been the world of transport. Its a hard business.

I think being stuck between a rock and a hard place Bulmers have taken the best option available to them as a company to try and keep going. Lets hope the new company tries to help those smaller enities that are going to take a hit from Bulmers Logistics going down.

Your right Ricky this business is a hard business and not easy for the smaller haulier to get on in, especially when you take into account some of the stunts pulled by large companies over the years but who cry foul at the slightest thing by small hauliers, and you have to remember that haulage rates are governed not by small companies unde-cutting but by the larger ones.

Not wishing to see anyone out of work andy, but Bulmer didn`t seem to worry about the small hauliers working for the trailer/box operators that he was prepared to push aside to increase the size of his business ■■?

This manoeuvre may have been legal but its certainly not moral,

well said… :sunglasses:

i wonder if he’s paid his subbies up?