British Made Lorries

Franglais:

Carryfast:
Do you really think that the French plan isn’t that of taking out all its GM competition in Europe.Of which we are just a small satellite assembly operation and as such we have more to gain by getting into a trade war with Europe than we have to to lose.IE we lose Astra exports there through tarrifs we hit PSA and Renault and VAG and all the rest with quotas.

While GM manufacturing ended here decades ago anyway with the last Vivas and Victors and Bedfords etc.Make no mistake the Polish and German plants have more to be worried about than us.While GM are just acting true to form in being a bunch of muppets just as previously having not only taken out its UK operations long ago but now also closing its Australian Holden operations.IE nothing to do with the EU but just GM acting true to form as usual in cutting off its nose to spite its face.Just as it did in the case of handing its heavy vehicle manufacturing operation over to Volvo and calling Daewoo’s Chevrolets.

On that note just like the Australian government it doesn’t make much difference to us either way unless our own government is prepared to act in the national interest.In this case in the form of kicking out the Europeans whether Opel or PSA etc and taking our own manufacturing base like Vauxhall and Leyland back from the US multinationals by compulsory purchase and if needed Nationalisation.Then applying the strict import barriers that we should have applied in 1973 instead of joining the EU.All of which I’m sure that the Trump administration would be more sympathetic to than seeing us get screwed by those with your plans in the EU for the crime of wanting to secede. :bulb:

Para 1. So we put quotas on all PSA Renault etc cars into the UK? Well thatll put up our cost of living straight away. With retaliatory quotas against us Nissan wont be sticking around too long Id bet so unemployment rises. Para 2. The Polish economy has more potential for growth than ours, so plants there are more likely to be a future investment surely? A relatively cheap, but well educated workforce that has proved itself motivated enough to travel and seek work, with space on cheap land for expansion. G.M. is merely acting like the multi-national or maybe supra-national company it is. No thought given to any country or its population.
Para 3. “taking our own manufacturing base like Vauxhall and Leyland back from the US multinationals by compulsory purchase” They would currently worth how much? Not enough to build an economy on Id think. Where would the components or raw materials come from? In your scenario wed be in a trade war with almost everyone and would be paying top money to import steel etc.
We can maybe agree on the problem CF, but I cant agree youre offering a solution here.

EDIT: re Trump: Any sympathy from him will be as valuable as his promises.

You don’t see that what I’m saying is a solution because you obviously think that carrying on as we are with an unsustainable trade deficit is viable.Nor do you seem to want to even take on board the idea that the domestic market is worth more to us at home than our combined sales to the EU.IE they flog more cars and components for sale here than we flog there.In which case the way punitive quotas work is that EU tariffs hit our exports.But UK manufacturers have more to gain here when the domestic customer base is faced with the choice of buy British or go without not pay more because quotas mean an under supplied protected market not the choice of pay more for the French/German etc import.In which case are you really suggesting that UK manufacturing wouldn’t then take off to meet that captive demand by necessity.At which point that compulsory purchased Vauxhall factory starts to look a lot more attractive with a captive domestic market that means not only a move away from small scale assembly of Astras.But the ‘manufacture’ of both Astras and Zafiras among others.As does re building the damage done to our manufacturing base in general.The same situation could also apply to Leyland.IE Leyland moves from assembly to manufacture of all trucks sold in the UK.

IE as I said we stop being a small satellite assembly operation and get back to actually making stuff again from steel works to finished product.Instead of giving away the jobs to European workers.That argument soon to be added to when German workers find their jobs going to France.Or could that be a political move to re distribute wealth from Germany to France because of the fear of the rise of the FN ?.

muckles:

Franglais:
The American electorate had a hard choice: Who was the least worst option? Glad I didn`t have to live with being on any winning side in that contest.

It was the point where you wanted the option from Brewster’s Millions of “None of the Above” :laughing:

Open door immigration ( at least for those most likely to vote for the Obamas and Clintons of this world ) and race to the bottom free markets policy of the Democrats v the controlled immigration and protectionist economic policies of Trump in which he wants US jobs for US workers and the Germans etc to pay their fair share of NATO’s defence costs for example.What was/is the third way here ?. :confused:

Carryfast makes good points but I’m not driving a bloody Vauxhall.
I do drive a British built car though and it’s been very reliable and well built too.

If we do Brexit I will start to worry when our gov cancels…the third runway, the silly rail line up north in Leeds,we cancel Trident,close all militery bases in Scotland, cancels the Newclear power st at hinkley point. last but not least when I see the population size go down or at least stay the same maybe I will regret not following niel kinnock or tim the ventroloquist dummy fallon their advice

Carryfast:

muckles:

Franglais:
The American electorate had a hard choice: Who was the least worst option? Glad I didn`t have to live with being on any winning side in that contest.

It was the point where you wanted the option from Brewster’s Millions of “None of the Above” :laughing:

Open door immigration ( at least for those most likely to vote for the Obamas and Clintons of this world ) and race to the bottom free markets policy of the Democrats v the controlled immigration and protectionist economic policies of Trump in which he wants US jobs for US workers and the Germans etc to pay their fair share of NATO’s defence costs for example.What was/is the third way here ?. :confused:

Even if you agree with his policies, do you think Donald Trump has the charisma and intelligence to unite the US and take it in that direction in the long term?

And as for my views on Clinton, I’ll refer to the one of my earlier posts on this page.

muckles:

Carryfast:

muckles:

Franglais:
The American electorate had a hard choice: Who was the least worst option? Glad I didn`t have to live with being on any winning side in that contest.

It was the point where you wanted the option from Brewster’s Millions of “None of the Above” :laughing:

Open door immigration ( at least for those most likely to vote for the Obamas and Clintons of this world ) and race to the bottom free markets policy of the Democrats v the controlled immigration and protectionist economic policies of Trump in which he wants US jobs for US workers and the Germans etc to pay their fair share of NATO’s defence costs for example.What was/is the third way here ?. :confused:

Even if you agree with his policies, do you think Donald Trump has the charisma and intelligence to unite the US and take it in that direction in the long term?

And as for my views on Clinton, I’ll refer to the one of my earlier posts on this page.

I don’t think they have the luxury of charisma or otherwise mattering in the slightest.When it’s the policies that matter.As for uniting two totally opposing groups with an almost 50/50 split no chance.On that note either the anti Trump faction will admit defeat and let him get on with it.Or the place will have to split,along the Confederal lines allowing each state to go its own way as it should have done long ago,at least regards trade and industry and immigration and eco policies.IE California and Texas become totally opposite thinking sovereign states for example.IE there is a limit to how far democracy can work until it then has to split along totally irreconcilably opposite lines. :bulb:

Carryfast:

muckles:

Carryfast:
Open door immigration ( at least for those most likely to vote for the Obamas and Clintons of this world ) and race to the bottom free markets policy of the Democrats v the controlled immigration and protectionist economic policies of Trump in which he wants US jobs for US workers and the Germans etc to pay their fair share of NATO’s defence costs for example.What was/is the third way here ?. :confused:

Even if you agree with his policies, do you think Donald Trump has the charisma and intelligence to unite the US and take it in that direction in the long term?

And as for my views on Clinton, I’ll refer to the one of my earlier posts on this page.

I don’t think they have the luxury of charisma or otherwise mattering in the slightest.When it’s the policies that matter.As for uniting two totally opposing groups with an almost 50/50 split no chance.On that note either the anti Trump faction will admit defeat and let him get on with it.Or the place will have to split,along the Confederal lines allowing each state to go its own way as it should have done long ago,at least regards trade and industry and immigration and eco policies.IE California and Texas become totally opposite thinking sovereign states for example.IE there is a limit to how far democracy can work until it then has to split along totally irreconcilably opposite lines. :bulb:

If you believe for many of the electorate only policies matter, then you haven’t grasped how politics works especially in recent years where there has been far to much image over substance, it’s why the media try and build up or destroy candidates as much as their policies.

The Presidential debate between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960 was a prime example of this, those that listened on the Radio preferred Nixon, but those that watched on telly preferred the clean cut, young Kennedy.

And although you have hard and fast opinions, many people don’t they’ll go with the crowd, with their peer group, their opinions can be molded by influential people, it’s why politicians love celebratory endorsements.
Do you really believe many of those protesting against Trump really know what they protesting against or have been influenced by the media backed anti-trump hysteria?

muckles:
If you believe for many of the electorate only policies matter, then you haven’t grasped how politics works especially in recent years where there has been far to much image over substance, it’s why the media try and build up or destroy candidates as much as their policies.

The Presidential debate between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960 was a prime example of this, those that listened on the Radio preferred Nixon, but those that watched on telly preferred the clean cut, young Kennedy.

And although you have hard and fast opinions, many people don’t they’ll go with the crowd, with their peer group, their opinions can be molded by influential people, it’s why politicians love celebratory endorsements.
Do you really believe many of those protesting against Trump really know what they protesting against or have been influenced by the media backed anti-trump hysteria?

Ironically the Clinton/Blair etc etc supporting media bandwagon is just taking advantage of the very real psychology which is there within its target audience.IE anti nation state,pro open borders,free trade at any cost.With a weird,effectively reverse racist agenda,against the ethnic Brit demographic seemingly based on long past wrongs which themselves are often just a biased selective view of history to suit their own self serving agenda.

Which in this case translates as turkeys continuing to vote for christmas in the form of more cheap labour free trade with places like China,more cheap labour open door third world immigration whether Mexico or Asia,and more false eco excuse taxation and industrial vandalism at home to create wealth distribution in the ‘developing’ economies.

In addition to as in our case continuing to defend a system which gives Brit jobs away to foreign workers in whatever form whether EU or globally and then expects the resulting redundant or at best low paid domestic workforce to pay for the resulting debt.

IE it seems clear that the media crusade against Trump ( or Putin or Le Pen or even Farage ) is no different to its general crusade elsewhere.Which is first and foremost all about getting rid of the idea of Nationalism and with it the nation state and the national interest to start with.In favour of a world order run by people like Blair and Clinton and Juncker and Tusk ( also previously that bastion of the worst that America has to offer in the form of Nixon ) and now with Jinping at the top of that pile.

The smoking gun here being the question why does the establishment controlled media seem to be all for if not admirers of Jinping and China but against probably Nationalist Putin and definitely Nationalist Trump ?. :bulb:

On that note if plenty of people weren’t interested in policies as opposed to what the media tell them then Trump would obviously have lost and we’d now also be facing a Blair/Cameron alliance signing us up to a Federal Europe.In which case it would have been difficult to see what would be the point of either Leyland’s or Vauxhall’s remaining operations.When as we’ve been told Poland can offer more access to cheap space and cheap labour and the French and Germans ( or Dutch ) aren’t in it to provide Brit jobs at the expense of their own workforces. :bulb: