Thanks for the info’ on the girl. Hope she does make a full recovery. Agree about people joining a forum seemingly to have a go at people on here. Maybe it’s best to totally ignore people like that. Might be an idea for everyone to go to the friends and foes list and stick him/her on it.
Socketset:
And Chester, a reminder, this is a forum for professional drivers, the vast majority being involved driving trucks.
+1
…and a small minority involved driving lorries.
They should be on lorry net uk.
Socketset:
You wouldn’t see a soldiers forum with poster using an avatar of a gun with a line thru it.
Can you explain why this would never happen?
peterm:
Maybe it’s best to totally ignore people like that. Might be an idea for everyone to go to the friends and foes list and stick him/her on it.
Why the hell are you trying to dictate who other posters should be friends or foe with!
Please tell me why this should be the case, is it just because my veiw does not fit in with your personal/this sites agenda!
.
chester wrote:
Chester you got the wrong forum problem when you post on more then one, that’s your Cyclist’s the Master race gathering picture
And you wouldn’t get squddies having a rifle with a line though it as they tend to have pride in serving there country and doing it with respect (you might have to look that word up 
I.e if you had any respect for anyone you would keep your idiotic rants to your self and go outside smell you’re saddle or what ever other hobbies you have) Problem with this forum is we argue with cyclist’s rule the world idiots and they drag us down to there level then beat us with experience
Having a opinion is one thing trying to force it on others is another, Dunno if its a Ego thing or a you’ve really have nothing else to do in life sort of thing but a good 80% of what you do on here is done to get a negative reaction out of people.
Yes you don’t like HGV’s and all other road users who don’t have 2 wheels no one is forcing you to drive them, you can get equal if not greater wages stacking shelfs etc. Maybe your just a lycra clad boring sort of chap, who no one in real life talks to hence you come on a truck forum posting anti HGV posts with a anti HGV avatar
chester:
peterm:
Maybe it’s best to totally ignore people like that. Might be an idea for everyone to go to the friends and foes list and stick him/her on it.Why the hell are you trying to dictate who other posters should be friends or foe with!
Please tell me why this should be the case, is it just because my veiw does not fit in with your personal/this sites agenda!
Getting a bit carried away there. Point out where I tried to dictate to anyone. I don’t have an agenda either. I do have an opinion as do you. The difference is that I realise that yours is the opinion of an idiot that rants and raves and goes out of his/her way to annoy people.
You shouldn’t bother replying to this because as soon as I’ve finished typing you’re going on that list so I won’t see any more of your idiotic rants.
I cannot believe people are still whining about an avatar. In my experience soldiers are just as likely, if not more so, to have a picture of a rifle with a line through it. It’s nothing to do with pride and all to do with being contrary or ironic. Get over it.
As I wrote before, and nobody answered, it is a trucking forum so why was this subject brought up in the first place? It wouldn’t be so we could all have another pop at those demon cyclists could it?
peterm:
chester:
peterm:
Maybe it’s best to totally ignore people like that. Might be an idea for everyone to go to the friends and foes list and stick him/her on it.Why the hell are you trying to dictate who other posters should be friends or foe with!
Please tell me why this should be the case, is it just because my veiw does not fit in with your personal/this sites agenda!
Getting a bit carried away there. Point out where I tried to dictate to anyone.
Do you not ever read what you write?
You have asked me to point out an example where you have tried to dictate.
Look no further that the post you replied to 
to make it easier, I shall colour it in for you.
The last post made on this was 5 bloody days a go. Are you ■■■■■■ and after a rowl, bored, or just trolling. The arguments over be the bigger man and leave it instead of banging on about the same ■■■■ trying to get a reaction ffs.
+1
I have been away the last couple of weeks working, why shouldn’t I carry on a thread I last posted on?
He’s ■■■■■■■■■■■■ peterm/slackbladder posted the last post on this thread on the 31st December. There has been no other comment since until yours now on the 5th. By all means bring a thread back up but you have brought it up again just to start/carry on your argument. The argument is 5 days old and yet you have to get the last word in you have added to this thread for no other reason then cause a problem and reserect an argument. What is the point.
Karl86:
The last post made on this was 5 bloody days a go. Are you ■■■■■■ and after a rowl, bored, or just trolling. The arguments over be the bigger man and leave it instead of banging on about the same [zb] trying to get a reaction ffs.
Your now added to the dictator list. Since. When have time frames in posting to threads been protocol on TNUK
Are you going to blow your top at all threads folks resurrect, which folks may not have the time to reply straightaway to your liking?
Karl86:
He’s ■■■■■■■■■■■■ peterm posted the last post on this thread on the 31st December. There has been no other comment since until yours now on the 5th. By all means bring a thread back up but you have brought it up again just to start/carry on your argument. The argument is 5 days old and yet you have to get the last word in you have added to this thread for no other reason then cause a problem and reserect an argument. What is the point.
Iam causing arguments?
Read the thread again.
A cyclist knocks a ■■■■■■■ a crossing over and injures her.
I ask why the 7 motorists who killed pedestrians on crossings in 2012 are never mentioned.
All hell breaks loose!
… and that was answered on the first page. Karl86 is right, you’ve just reopened this to get the last word in. You big child. 
Karl86:
He’s ■■■■■■■■■■■■ peterm/slackbladder posted the last post on this thread on the 31st December. There has been no other comment since until yours now on the 5th. By all means bring a thread back up but you have brought it up again just to start/carry on your argument. The argument is 5 days old and yet you have to get the last word in you have added to this thread for no other reason then cause a problem and reserect an argument. What is the point.
I carried on in conversation the last post what made reference to me. Why have you felt the need to get involved in a thread your fed up with, especially if the post wasn’t in reference to you?
As I’ve said it’s not bringing the thread back up there’s no problem with that that’s why all threads are kept. The problem is you have bought it up just to carry on throwing your hand bag around and trying to create and argument with those whom have long got over it. I have no interest in your petty ■■■■■ slapping with who ever you were doing it with, i have no problem with cyclists, i understand motorists also cause accidents on crossings,i see as many bad car/lorry drivers as i do cyclists i have no biase as to motorists being better then cyclists i spend all day looking at them but it would be nice to browse the forum and some good thought provoking threads without some one wanting to use them to create an argument.
Karl86:
As I’ve said it’s not bringing the thread back up there’s no problem with that that’s why all threads are kept. The problem is you have bought it up just to carry on throwing your hand bag around and trying to create and argument with those whom have long got over it. I have no interest in your petty ■■■■■ slapping with who ever you were doing it with, i have no problem with cyclists, i understand motorists also cause accidents on crossings,i see as many bad car/lorry drivers as i do cyclists i have no biase as to motorists being better then cyclists i spend all day looking at them but it would be nice to browse the forum and some good thought provoking threads without some one wanting to use them to create an argument.
Your the only person who’s venting off?
I mearly replied to a question aimed at me a few days ago, my. First chance to respond to that question was tonight.
Surley that is not a hard concept for you to grasp?
Why have you got involved and then moaned about arguments,
If it’s bothering you then don’t post on this thread. This internet thing isn’t really that hard when you think about it.