Seems our jobs are safe for now, as google have admitted that drivers have had to take over control of the vehicle to prevent accidents.
bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35301279
So sorry dozy, you’re on your own for now! 
But John Krafcik, the newly appointed president of Google’s self-driving car project, said earlier this week that allowing humans to intervene could actually make a crash more likely.
What about this bit. It seems to make a lot of sense.
I’m sure one day there will be fully Autonomous cars but I think we’re a long way from it yet.
It’s interesting but not surprising, to note that the information had to be prized out of Google just as I’m sure detailed information will have to be prized out of other companies who are developing Autonomous cars, the risks are to great to rely on these large companies being transparent about test results.
Do you mean autonomous? Come on Beezle no gold star for you
albion1971:
But John Krafcik, the newly appointed president of Google’s self-driving car project, said earlier this week that allowing humans to intervene could actually make a crash more likely.What about this bit. It seems to make a lot of sense.
But he’s not exactly unbiased is he, frankly I wouldn’t trust what any of these large companies say without independent verification.
m1cks:
Do you mean autonomous? Come on Beezle no gold star for you
Opps! 
Evil8Beezle:
m1cks:
Do you mean autonomous? Come on Beezle no gold star for you
Don’t you mean oops [emoji8]
m1cks:
Evil8Beezle:
m1cks:
Do you mean autonomous? Come on Beezle no gold star for you
Don’t you mean oops [emoji8]
LOL - Let’s play a little guessing game. I’m thinking of 2 words, and the second one is off!
Evil8Beezle:
m1cks:
Evil8Beezle:
m1cks:
Do you mean autonomous? Come on Beezle no gold star for you
Don’t you mean oops [emoji8]
LOL - Let’s play a little guessing game. I’m thinking of 2 words, and the second one is off!
Dance?
tachograph:
albion1971:
But John Krafcik, the newly appointed president of Google’s self-driving car project, said earlier this week that allowing humans to intervene could actually make a crash more likely.What about this bit. It seems to make a lot of sense.
But he’s not exactly unbiased is he, frankly I wouldn’t trust what any of these large companies say without independent verification.
And that is what we will have to wait for, to get any meaningful information about the reliability/fallibility of these things.
Or for a test driver to turn whistle blower, but that’s unlikely as I’m sure they would be ■■■■■■■ on a Non Disclosure Agreement tighter than a ducks arse!