nsmith1180:
Bking:
So you need an ADR to recover some old bloody tanker?
What a load of bollox
What the hell do they “teach” you on an ADR course?
Sod all but give us the money.
The wrecker man probably knows more about ADR than the monkey driving the truck.
I’ll address each line in turn.
Yes, you would need ADR to recover ‘some old bloody tanker’.
No, it isn’t a load of bollox.
Quite a lot actually, have you ever done one? If not, how are you fit to judge?
Whilst more money is involved in ADR, which is why most of us ADR licenced drivers did it in the first place, You also get a licence to carry dangerous goods. This is important because:
It doesn’t matter how much the wrecker man knows. It doesn’t matter if he holds every qualification under the sun except ADR because its the law of the land. If you have dangerous goods and don’t have that little card from Scotland, (or the paper part) then you cant carry it.
I’ve often heard “bollox” from the ignorant at the start of a course, the favourite being along the lines of “it’s bollox, because it comes from the EU,” or some other such nonsense.
Whilst it’s true that ADR might appear to the ignorant that it comes from the EU, the simple fact is that it DOESN’T.
ADR actually comes from UNECE, which is far bigger than the EU.
As an organisation, UNECE facilitates international trade (amongst many other things) so the basic idea is that there is a single international agreement between approx. 50 countries that they will move dangerous goods internationally by an agreed set of rules.
That saves international drivers from having to learn the vagaries of differing national rules covering the transporting of dangerous goods when they do international work. On an ADR course, drivers learn a standardised set of rules for international work plus a couple of other ‘national’ bits and bobs.
If Bking could only realise that the notion of ADR can be likened to a MAC or a TAC in his chosen field, because the intent of the lawmakers to standardise things is the same. 
The next question is (given that ADR covers international journeys) how come it’s needed for a national journey from Birmingham to London? (A very good question.)
Each member country of ADR is therefore still free to make their own national rules (for national transport) within their territory, and the UK is no exception to this. This includes penalties for breaches, because ADR doesn’t set any penalties. It’s therefore important to realise that breaches of ADR are handled and dealt with very differently in the various member countries.
So the answer is an easy one, and the answer is… Because the UK Parliament and HM the Queen said so!
We’ll start with The Health and Safety at Work (etc) Act 1974 (which Bking might have heard of.) 
The 1974 Act gives rise to a set of UK Regulations called The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2009, which we shorten to CDG 2009 but only because the full title is a bit of a mouthful.
Of that whole set of Regulations, Reg.5 is the most important because it tells us that in most instances, we should do most things as per ADR.
The rest of the Regs in the set (and a couple of other lawbooks) tell us what we are to do differently and in what circumstances it should be done differently.
So Bking, it IS the law of the land and you will usually need an ADR licence to “recover some old bloody tanker” quite simply because the UK Parliament and HM the Queen said so!