a broken lorry

axle fell off.jpg
how the [zb] could this happen? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Is this from your latest trip across the water?!


I am here: tapatalk.com/map.php?tdjhsp

xfmatt:
Is this from your latest trip across the water?!


I am here: tapatalk.com/map.php?tdjhsp

the second word is ā€œOFFā€. :laughing: :laughing:

Looks like the chassis has snapped clean in half,cut and shut job?

limeyphil:
0
how the [zb] could this happen? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Although it looks quite genuine, I recon that pic is a ā€˜set up’. Scania’s have their exhaust silencer on the rhs & this one hasn’t, normally when it isn’t there it’s because the truck has been fitted with an Eminox type vertical silencer which this clearly hasn’t.

I once sold a 143 Scania to an exporter who cut it exactly where this appears to have snapped, (right in front of the rear suspension) so that brings with it another posibility, could it have been a rigid that’s been shortened to a tractor unit & broken where it had been re-joined??

Either way, the ā€˜chassis furniture’ isn’t in the normal configuration for a 4 series unit.

Ross.

I can remember a photo in a truck mag from a number of years ago, I think it was at Corley svcs south bound. Chassis rail snapped one side of tractor unit, so the front half did a right turn while the rear half stayed in line with the trailer. Ho hum.

bigr250:

limeyphil:
0
how the [zb] could this happen? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Although it looks quite genuine, I recon that pic is a ā€˜set up’. Scania’s have their exhaust silencer on the rhs & this one hasn’t, normally when it isn’t there it’s because the truck has been fitted with an Eminox type vertical silencer which this clearly hasn’t.

I once sold a 143 Scania to an exporter who cut it exactly where this appears to have snapped, (right in front of the rear suspension) so that brings with it another posibility, could it have been a rigid that’s been shortened to a tractor unit & broken where it had been re-joined??

Either way, the ā€˜chassis furniture’ isn’t in the normal configuration for a 4 series unit.

Ross.

i would presume that your theories are based on a RHD vehicle, this is a LHD vehicle, so, theoretically, the exhaust and other items could be on the opposite side

shuttlespanker:
i would presume that your theories are based on a RHD vehicle, this is a LHD vehicle, so, theoretically, the exhaust and other items could be on the opposite side

Same on both, batteries on left hand side with the exhaust on right & both take up the same ammount of chassis space which is why 4x2 Scania’s often have 1,400l fuel tanks, identical 700l tanks each side & you’ll note that the fuel tank on the right hand side in the photo comes right up to the mudguard which isn’t normal on left or right hand drive 4 series trucks.

bastrucks.com/search/vehicle … Full-Image

Ross.

a few years ago we were doing a 6 weekly inspection on a sed atki 6 wheel tipper and the o/s chassis rail was completely broken through on the o/s just on front of the rear bogie…it had been running fully laden every day and the driver had not noticed any problem!! if the n/s had of gone aswell god knows what might have happenned?

It does show that 6 weekly inspections are useful, if they are done properly, even steam cleaning the chassis every 6 weeks lets you see cracks as they appear.

Even something as simple as drilling a hole for a fire extinguisher box or food box could cause that

bigr250:

limeyphil:
0
how the [zb] could this happen? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Although it looks quite genuine, I recon that pic is a ā€˜set up’. Scania’s have their exhaust silencer on the rhs & this one hasn’t, normally when it isn’t there it’s because the truck has been fitted with an Eminox type vertical silencer which this clearly hasn’t.

I once sold a 143 Scania to an exporter who cut it exactly where this appears to have snapped, (right in front of the rear suspension) so that brings with it another posibility, could it have been a rigid that’s been shortened to a tractor unit & broken where it had been re-joined??

Either way, the ā€˜chassis furniture’ isn’t in the normal configuration for a 4 series unit.

Ross.

ross its not always the case about having an eminox fitted as kindle had a 144/164 in blue and gold 6x2 which had 2 big tanks which had an exhaust like off a 3 series pal

Only ever seen chassis cracks on steel springs never on air.

Seems like a lot of effort to go to faking the picture.

Can’t quite make out what’s happened to the propshaft looks like it might still be under the trailer but doesn’t seem big enough.

Well I had an 85cf DAF ex Reid’s of Minishant on internal work in an opencast it was on air and it split the nearside rail big time. Eddie.

russian kamas , must be made of sturdier stuff as only one side broke
or may this is photoshopped too :laughing:

youtube.com/watch?v=m4ynb3tKIlE

mark h:
ross its not always the case about having an eminox fitted as kindle had a 144/164 in blue and gold 6x2 which had 2 big tanks which had an exhaust like off a 3 series pal

I was generalising, I don’t doubt there are plenty of other reasons but generally that’s why the RH tank would be up against the mudguard. 6X2’s are another problem altogether, trying to fit 1,000l + sized taks to one of these will require the removal & replacement of the standard silencer and an Eminox type is normally the favoured option.

Ross.

bigr250:

mark h:
ross its not always the case about having an eminox fitted as kindle had a 144/164 in blue and gold 6x2 which had 2 big tanks which had an exhaust like off a 3 series pal

I was generalising, I don’t doubt there are plenty of other reasons but generally that’s why the RH tank would be up against the mudguard. 6X2’s are another problem altogether, trying to fit 1,000l + sized taks to one of these will require the removal & replacement of the standard silencer and an Eminox type is normally the favoured option.

Ross.

yerr agreed mate just noting that its not always the case :slight_smile:

taxi :open_mouth:

I remember when i worked in Workshop at Scania it was always a hassl with new Lorries to get it ready for the Customer.
We got the Lorry in one Size and had to made the one longer and shorten the other.
Now,as it looks to me they had to move the Axle back.
Normally,we would have welded a Peace of Frame on the back of the original Frame.
Then we need to move the Axle back,which is fixed with millions of Steel rivets.
Then you drill holes to fix that Axle now with Screws.
Well,in that Case are just a few Screws from the rear Air-Bag on the welded Frame.
But,if you are lazy,so you cut the frame in the middn,welding a peace of frame in,and,if you not good in welding then that maight happen. :slight_smile:
Think thats what has happened here

At least they won’t have to buy new Suzie’s…

Who gave you permission to photo my lorry?