What is the intention of the EU regulations in article 8?
After all, they did not write them for ‘fun’!!
To my mind, they were written with the intention of preventing a driver from working too long in a given time period.
It seems they had 2 tasks. The first was to make sure the driver had a long rest in every week (WEEKLY REST) and the second, to make sure the driver had a reasonable rest every day (DAILY REST).
So how do they ensure the first task, the WEEKLY rest?
They decide on a time period into which it must fit, they chose 7 full days, one week or 168 hours.
They then choose the maximum that can be continuously done between weekly rest periods in that time period; they chose 6 full days or 144 hours.
They then choose the minimum continuous rest that must be done within that time period; they chose 45 hours as a standard but allow it to be reduced to 24 hours every so often.
They then had to make a regulation, which is article 8. 6.
A weekly rest period shall start no later than at the end of six 24-hour periods from the end of the previous weekly rest period.
Which allows for the minimum of 24 hours weekly rest to be taken (if available).
Now to the second task, the DAILY rest.
They decide on a time period into which it must fit, they chose 24 hours.
They then choose the continuous minimum rest that must be done within that time period; they chose 11 hours as a standard but allow it to be reduced to 9 hours so many times.
They then had to make a regulation, which is article 8. 2.
Within each period of 24 hours after the end of the previous daily rest period or weekly rest period a driver shall have taken a new daily rest period.
From the intentions it now becomes clear that they mean for a driver to have a minimum rest period within certain time periods.
If the intention had been to stipulate a set amount of daily periods within the parameters of the weekly period then would have been quite easy to put in another separate regulation, which said —
A maximum of 5 daily rest periods can be used between weekly rest periods.
But would that make sense in relation to what the intent is?
If a driver fits more daily rest periods into the maximum allowed six day period then that driver is working less and having more rest than a driver who works longer hours and fits the minimum amount of daily rest periods into the same time frame so it would not make much sense to force an early weekly rest onto a driver who was already resting more.
Leaving driving, other work, POA and breaks to one side for this example;
Driver ‘A’ does 15 hours duty & 9 hours daily rest for the first 3 days then 13 hours duty for the following 3 days, which includes 2 daily rests of 11 hours.
A weekly rest would follow the last 13 hours of duty time.
Between the weekly rests, that is a total of 84 hours duty over 6 daily duty periods with 5 daily rests totalling 49 hours.
Compare that with driver ‘B’ who does 7 lots of 11 hours duty time and follows each one with 11 hours of daily rest.
A weekly rest would follow the last 11 hours of duty time.
Between the weekly rests, that is a total of 77 hours duty over 7 daily duty periods with 6 daily rests totalling 66 hours.
Why would the authorities want to make driver ‘B’ take an early weekly rest when he has already had more rest than driver ‘A’?
I believe that the authorities have looked at the intentions of what the regulations are trying to do and interpreted the regulations (correctly in my opinion) to fit the intent.
They have, after all, done what the regulations intended. They have ensured that minimum daily and weekly rests have been taken during the period of one week, 7 days or 168 hours.