Olog Hai:
Once again, I find myself replying to Winseer despite having sworn not to.
If I am reading those two posts correctly, you seem to have a problem with you not being allowed to migrate to the US without being able to support yourself, in the US government’s eyes. Then you have a problem with the UK allowing people to come here… without having the ability to support themselves.
So in other words, when migration suits you it’s OK, yet when it doesn’t suit you, it’s not OK and we get another regurgitation of the ill-informed knuckledragger ■■■■■■■■ that Nigel Farage and others have spoon fed to you.
Which one is it to be?
Let’s put it this way:
I bang on about how unfair it is that we’ll let any bugger into this country, no matter how poor their prospects or even ID is. When I pump such moans - I get told I’m an Islamophobe, because I’ve got nothing against EE’s taking our jobs (because they at least are EU citizens and working) but have got everything against people pretending to be something they’re not (Syrian Refugees, under 16, Running away from ISIS for examples) - and get welcomed here with open arms.
To support yourself in any country you are emigrating to - “Having the job lined up” should be the be all and end all of getting in - Right? This is what I’m referring to with “Sponsorship.”
There is a firm out there giving you a well-paid job that proves to the immigration authorities that you’ll be able to support yourself when you get there. That firm employing you will help you find affordable accommodation, since you won’t qualify for a mortgage as well. They’ll likely take the skill set of your missus into account too.
These are the sort of things I would be expected to reasonably asked. NOT if I can afford to buy a house cash, Employ at least three people, or am prepared to live in the states where the authorities want to allocate me, rather than a place that is on a shortlist of preferences I’ve already chosen.
I only expressed an interest in the first instance, because I was led to believe that backwater states wanted trained and skilled workers to choose to go there, rather than the expensive coastal areas, where such mainstream jobs are in perhaps shorter supply.
I expressed an interest in Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Wyoming, N&S Dakota, and even Nebraska. Small town living really appeals to me. I was quite happy to take a supermarket supply job or even consider interstate tramping to “keep in work” as it were. All to no avail. I’m simply not wealthy enough. Canada was even harder to negotiate with than USA. No “Fast Track” for commonwealth applicants then!
Britain must be the only country on Earth with the generosity to take on undesirables rather than people representing a skills shortage. If that were not true, we would only be admitting EU citizens into this country - ever. No need to look at Commonwealth even, because our generosity isn’t reciprocated as I’ve said above.