180 day rule

Recently I turned up for my first shift at a new company (via agency), and had to sign a declaration that I had 180 days recorded driving before starting. Being a relatively new driver I knew I didn’t, and made the bloke in the office aware. He said it didn’t actually matter, and that it was mainly a formality. Long story short, I’ve been driving for them for quite a while now, and no one seems to mind about the 180 day rule!

Do most companys have this approach? :unamused:

When a company wants a driver there and then all the so called rules and policies go out the window

ROG:
When a company wants a driver there and then all the so called rules and policies go out the window

Maybe it’s just me being old fashioned, but what’s the point in having a rule if it’s not gonna be enforced? If it really is just a formality then I would have so many more work opportunities in terms of driving work :unamused:

The 180 rule may be for their own insurance policy. It could be the agency has their own cover policy that over rules …

clarky3013:

ROG:
When a company wants a driver there and then all the so called rules and policies go out the window

Maybe it’s just me being old fashioned, but what’s the point in having a rule if it’s not gonna be enforced? If it really is just a formality then I would have so many more work opportunities in terms of driving work :unamused:

What the company want and what they get can be two different things with operational needs taking preference

Its not ‘a rule’ as such but more of a preferred policy

So, in the “long story short” bit, did you sign it?

If you did, I wonder what the outcome would have been if you’d been involved in a serious collision, and the insurance company found out you didn’t have that much experience…

MrFlibble:
So, in the “long story short” bit, did you sign it?

If you did, I wonder what the outcome would have been if you’d been involved in a serious collision, and the insurance company found out you didn’t have that much experience…

Exactly, as I bet the manager that said it was a formality would be denying any knowledge of you telling him you didn’t have the 180 days experience.

I thought the same as you guys initially, it was playing on my mind throughout the whole shift, but as ROG said, it’s more of a preferred policy, so no legal stipulations as such, the worst that could happen is that insurance wouldn’t pay out on their behalf should something happen. But then again, I that would even put a dent in the profits of a company that size :unamused:

clarky3013:
I thought the same as you guys initially, it was playing on my mind throughout the whole shift, but as ROG said, it’s more of a preferred policy, so no legal stipulations as such, the worst that could happen is that insurance wouldn’t pay out on their behalf should something happen. But then again, I that would even put a dent in the profits of a company that size :unamused:

And what would stop them from pursuing you for the costs on the grounds that you gave false information? :open_mouth:
If it was only a preference, you wouldn’t HAVE to have signed it…

The manager/bloke wants his truck out working, he doesn’t give a rats arse about the legal ramifications to you mate!!!