I get that the householder probably shouldn’t have given chase (he did kind of admit the “red mist” came down) but th point I’m really trying to get across is the sentencing was totally the wrong way round
The householder was a hard working guy who’d never had any dealings with the police, the other two were a pair of low life scum, the kind who serve no useful purpose in society and yet, as usual (probably with the help of legal aid while the householder had to spend his life savings on a barrister) they get the soft sentence
The whole thing makes me seeth
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk