Bking:
And other good “practise” is to look for the obvious instead of relying on some crap confuser.
These pieces of crap can only “diagnose” anything that can send a signal.
Way too much “faith” put in this diagnostic [zb]
Would rather trust a man with 20 years experience than some prick that thinks a computer can tell him all the answers.
These diagnostic “systems” can ■■■■■■■ a vehicle when there is bugger all wrong with it.
And its getting worse.
Do we really need to know that “emissions” are high or that air usage is “critical” ?
Its all bollox and none of it is needed.
But it makes a lot of [zb]s a lot of money.
Like you post has no doubt confused the op no end