My experience failed now doing in AUTOMATIC

Digit369:
I’ve trained in the manual I can drive that fine just my nerves at roundabouts get me as every one learns at different paces

I’m told to arrive in 5 but when I get there a car comes shooting on the bout then I have to Foot brake then hand brake flick down to change gear look for the next car then mirrors then clutch blind spot

I

Forget the handbrake on a roundabout, waste of time. If you have to stop get it in 3rd or whatever gear you pull away in, hold it on the footbrake. That way your ready to go. See a spot, quick mirror and blind spot check and pull away.

Finding the biting point to pull away should be easily done after a few attempts, if you still need to sit there for 5 seconds finding the biting point then get your trainer to do some work with you on that.

If you forget about the handbrake, this is all stuff you have to do in a car… You don’t think twice about doing it in a car. Don’t be put off by the fact your in a lorry, it’s just bigger. Treat it the same but look for bigger gaps that’s all.

I’m told to arrive in 5

… and there is the problem. That is what I refer to as “Plan A”. But you must follow that with “Plan B” and, maybe, “Plan C”. Let me explain. Plan A is the nice optimistic approach - and that’s perfect. Always hope for the best - but plan for the worst. In this case, it’s a car looming into view. Put Plan B into place - check mirrors, into 3rd or 4th depending on speed/vehicle/incline then follow the vehicle onto the RAB. Plan C may be to slow all the way down to a crawl, engage 3rd or maybe 2nd (depending as above) then enter the RAB. Plan D will be to come to a halt but already in the appropriate gear to move off.

It sounds very much that if the 5th gear approach is snookered, there’s no back up plan.

Pete :laughing: :laughing:

Only time I’ve ever used a handbrake in a lorry on a roundabout is in an auto. From going from the footbrake to go there’s about a 2-3 second delay, by which that gap has gone. When you see a gap, hold it on handbrake, build revs up a tiny bit (just enough to pull away), release handbrake and away you go.

Digit369:
I’ve trained in the manual I can drive that fine just my nerves at roundabouts get me as every one learns at different paces

I’m told to arrive in 5 but when I get there a car comes shooting on the bout then I have to Foot brake then hand brake flick down to change gear look for the next car then mirrors then clutch blind spot

I

If I was your instructor I would give you roundabout after roundabout then more roundabouts to perfect your approach speed, assessing the traffic on a roundabout and decision making.

Forget the park brake if you have to stop unless your on a uphill.

Paul

With a manual gearbox, at a roundabout, I would say you only need the park brake if stood for a prolonged period or if stationary, facing uphill for more than 3 or 4 seconds. It’s called PARK brake for a reason!

Pete :laughing: :laughing:

What an interesting thread, some varied views.

We ONLY use automatic trucks for driver training and I have the proof to back up that its easier to pass, we have gone from 70%ish average 1st time pass rate to 92% so it cannot be denied that auto’s give more passes. The examiners say the vehicles are great, they love how drivers on test feel more in control and how they respond well in all situations - Volvo I-shift automatics are very good, can’t fault them.

As for Digit369 feeling that 16 hours isn’t long enough, frankly he is right, without being critical of his abilities its obvious he couldn’t just jump in a truck and drive it, unlike others on here, come on folks, you might be a fast learner but not everyone is. I’ve trained 100’s of drivers in the past 15 years on manual gearboxed trucks and he sounds like a 30-40 hour customer to me. Nothing to be ashamed of, i’m sure we can all be slower than others at learning different things. We do 21 hours with customers to learn to drive our Volvo automatics, so 16 hours on a manual for a driver that needs some careful instruction falls rather short. I know others on this forum think different but as an LGV Driving Instructor with experience - the only way to pass the test is to get driving experience for each person’s own ability, don’t mark others with your own card, some drivers need a lot of help to pass and to be honest those are the ones I remember. Paul Walker - do you remember Ahmed? I still chat to him now, took him over 30 tests to pass, he took 7 with us, and rest with others all over Yorkshire, but finally he passed with us after spending £64,000 with a variety of schools.

Here is the view of inside our truck, look no gear lever! Got two of these rigid '14 plate trucks.

Obviously Brokers are are a real pain, I speak to at least one person daily that has been to a broker, lost all their money and now wants to do a test with us. The well crafted website are very good, i don’t blame them choosing a broker as they do look better than all the websites of the different providers on this forum.

I expect all driving schools will have automatic trucks in 10 years time, once all the manual trucks get scrapped. So all the reasons for using manuals will be in material as customers will have no choice, the only reason driving schools still have manuals is money and not wanting to invest in new trucks. They don’t deserve your business, why would you not buy the best product on the market, its like buying an overpriced car that is worn out rather than getting a much newer one for the same price. To me it just doesn’t make sense, I love driving our old Volvo Globetrotter with a manual box, I should sell it really but I just keep it as a toy, but i’d rather use my new Globetrotter which is an auto for test, its such a lovely truck, and £1200 for the course all in, its cheaper than a broker and the same price as those using an old manual truck, so a no brainer really.

To those like Paul that think Digit369 has more problems than he realises because four serious faults ‘highlights there is more of a problem regardless of the gearbox’ - once Digit369 gets into an automatic he would find that other issues not related to gears will be improved or even vanish. The auto will help him to improve in all areas, makes driving far easier, more time to process other tasks, less stress on him and he should pass.

:smiley: thanks Laurie it’s true gears are a distraction and the training school I’m with are the only in The area who have one otherwise I would of gone elsewhere

I hope that a lot of trainers think about this for the future and invest in auto
As for the broker they should of already known this information actually goes to show how out of touch they are with the industry! And company’s that use them to get work are not doing there self any favours As it puts a stigma on them from the client.

Thank you for your advice

Tockwith, I don’t understand your logic.

You said you got rid of your W+D because it was too easy, and didn’t set people up for the “real world” then you claim that it’s easy to pass in the automatic, which it may well be, but, surely that doesn’t set you up for the “real world” either?

Passing in an auto, then going to a manual, will shake your average newbie. I passed in manuals, and I was thrown off by other manuals and automatics. So passing with something as “easy” as an automatic then jumping into an manual is going to be a shock to the system.

Point is, making a test as easy as possible doesn’t mean the candidate is going to be able to make easy work of the outside, uninstructed world. They’re going to struggle, and possibly be a danger to themselves and other road users, due to them not having a clue what to do with a manual gearbox!

Digit369:
I hope that a lot of trainers think about this for the future and invest in auto

Forgive me if you feel I’m rude but don’t worry about us trainers you would be best investing in a decent trainer to get you through the test.

Paul

Endgame:
Tockwith, I don’t understand your logic.

You said you got rid of your W+D because it was too easy, and didn’t set people up for the “real world” then you claim that it’s easy to pass in the automatic, which it may well be, but, surely that doesn’t set you up for the “real world” either?

Passing in an auto, then going to a manual, will shake your average newbie. I passed in manuals, and I was thrown off by other manuals and automatics. So passing with something as “easy” as an automatic then jumping into an manual is going to be a shock to the system.

Point is, making a test as easy as possible doesn’t mean the candidate is going to be able to make easy work of the outside, uninstructed world. They’re going to struggle, and possibly be a danger to themselves and other road users, due to them not having a clue what to do with a manual gearbox!

From a instructors point of view, anything to make the test easier on the candidate is a good thing. The bag of nerves they are carrying is already large enough without having to ■■■■ about with the gears. I know it doesn’t prepare you for the world of work but the test is not there to do that. Its there to teach you how to drive a lorry safely. Not everyone who takes an HGV test goes on to be a HGV driver. Horse box owners spring to mind here. I do see where you are coming from about jumping in a manual all by yourself because I did just that. My first time driving a manual was by myself on a trip up to Wakefield then the next day was down to Dartford. Yes it was scary but I already knew how to drive the truck and the gears aren’t that hard to grasp if you’ve driven a manual car. You underestimate someones ability to learn on the fly, just because someone learns and passes in a auto doesn’t mean they will be stumped by a manual.

I suppose it comes down to how quick you pick things up.

Tockwith Training:
What an interesting thread, some varied views.

We ONLY use automatic trucks for driver training and I have the proof to back up that its easier to pass, we have gone from 70%ish average 1st time pass rate to 92% so it cannot be denied that auto’s give more passes. The examiners say the vehicles are great, they love how drivers on test feel more in control and how they respond well in all situations - Volvo I-shift automatics are very good, can’t fault them.

As for Digit369 feeling that 16 hours isn’t long enough, frankly he is right, without being critical of his abilities its obvious he couldn’t just jump in a truck and drive it, unlike others on here, come on folks, you might be a fast learner but not everyone is. I’ve trained 100’s of drivers in the past 15 years on manual gearboxed trucks and he sounds like a 30-40 hour customer to me. Nothing to be ashamed of, i’m sure we can all be slower than others at learning different things. We do 21 hours with customers to learn to drive our Volvo automatics, so 16 hours on a manual for a driver that needs some careful instruction falls rather short. I know others on this forum think different but as an LGV Driving Instructor with experience - the only way to pass the test is to get driving experience for each person’s own ability, don’t mark others with your own card, some drivers need a lot of help to pass and to be honest those are the ones I remember. Paul Walker - do you remember Ahmed? I still chat to him now, took him over 30 tests to pass, he took 7 with us, and rest with others all over Yorkshire, but finally he passed with us after spending £64,000 with a variety of schools.

Here is the view of inside our truck, look no gear lever! Got two of these rigid '14 plate trucks.

Obviously Brokers are are a real pain, I speak to at least one person daily that has been to a broker, lost all their money and now wants to do a test with us. The well crafted website are very good, i don’t blame them choosing a broker as they do look better than all the websites of the different providers on this forum.

I expect all driving schools will have automatic trucks in 10 years time, once all the manual trucks get scrapped. So all the reasons for using manuals will be in material as customers will have no choice, the only reason driving schools still have manuals is money and not wanting to invest in new trucks. They don’t deserve your business, why would you not buy the best product on the market, its like buying an overpriced car that is worn out rather than getting a much newer one for the same price. To me it just doesn’t make sense, I love driving our old Volvo Globetrotter with a manual box, I should sell it really but I just keep it as a toy, but i’d rather use my new Globetrotter which is an auto for test, its such a lovely truck, and £1200 for the course all in, its cheaper than a broker and the same price as those using an old manual truck, so a no brainer really.

To those like Paul that think Digit369 has more problems than he realises because four serious faults ‘highlights there is more of a problem regardless of the gearbox’ - once Digit369 gets into an automatic he would find that other issues not related to gears will be improved or even vanish. The auto will help him to improve in all areas, makes driving far easier, more time to process other tasks, less stress on him and he should pass.

If I get stuck I might get some training

endgame, i respect your views on this matter, but as pete has said before until recently we trained drivers on 6 speed manuals and they could have got a job driving for morrisons in an ERF with a eaton twin split box, so whats the difference, and you even found that knowing one gearbox doesn’t prepare you for a different type. This way of thinking is rather backward, technology moves on and as a driving school the only way to prosper is to move with the times and not fail to modernise, its always been our aim to give customers what they want, and they want automatics.

i’ve never said we got rid of our drawbar because it was too easy, i said it was easy but doesn’t relate to the most common CE vehicle on the road, which is an artic, however auto trucks are getting more popular and in a few years I doubt there will be that many manuals about. Would you really have advised me to go out and buy 3 brand new manual trucks? Pete is buying up automatics too as he has seen the benefits just like us. the main reason we dropped drawbar is because the coupling on test is a real pain, artics are much easier and we always had artics since 1971 for training, the drawbar was a one off and frankly they are toy trucks and bought by companies as a cheaper alternative to having to buy a rigid and an artic, its two trucks in one.

Tockwith Training:
the only reason driving schools still have manuals is money and not wanting to invest in new trucks. They don’t deserve your business,

From some of the posts on this board I would have to say that’s nonsense, there are still plenty of people who realise that passing a test the easiest way isn’t necessarily the best long term option.

Tockwith Training:
We ONLY use automatic trucks for driver training and I have the proof to back up that its easier to pass, we have gone from 70%ish average 1st time pass rate to 92%

So 22% of your passes are people who couldn’t pass the test if if it had not been made easier for them :open_mouth:

Not saying much for the standard of new drivers your turning out is it :unamused:

The gears took up at least half of my 14 hours training and still needed more

What I am saying is that if you acquire the ticket you can get your foot in as you have made the first steps they just have to tickle you up a bit it’s not biological science exam it’s driving we all pick up bad habits car driving but to shake it up in 14 hours of actual driving and learning the gear ratio too then get in there and pass is totally the wrong way to approach maybe ok for the grandad rights 7.5 drivers who have had a bit of a idea about bigger than a Luton van but the new auto law is a good thing 100%

Well there is no point getting into an argument over this, driving schools have always bought the easiest to drive vehicles they could afford/source. Its accepted practice for car learner drivers, I don’t think a car instructor would get much business training drivers with a big old Volvo estate car, they all use nice cute little hatchbacks, because drivers know that after the test they can improve their ability and in time upgrade to a larger car as their life changes. Existing drivers will always believe that new drivers should be ‘trained properly’, but put yourself in the shoes of an average driver that just wants to pass the test and get himself a job that he has always dreamed of, as quickly and easily as possible.

Having spoken to a few of our customers that have passed on an auto and now driving manual trucks, they have said it hasn’t caused them any problems at work, after all changing gears is quite simple when not under the pressure of a test.

I’m still struggling with my car gears :smiley:

rearaxle:
I’m still struggling with my car gears :smiley:

Buy a auto lol lol

Paul

I have passed all my test in a manual now if I can do it anyone can

Go direct to the school book an assessment to see what they say take there advice on how much time you need then do it as at end of day it is only you that can pass

I have drove several types of gearbox & never had a problem just sat in cab for a few min going through it

Tockwith Training:
the only reason driving schools still have manuals is money and not wanting to invest in new trucks. They don’t deserve your business,

What a pig headed snobbish statement!!

What you have to remember that the DVSA have specifications on trucks to meet the test requirement. So basically it’s the trainers choice how to meet this requirement and the customer is free to go where he pleaseses.

Personally at present what I’m not prepared to do is what some certain trainers have done is taken a massive loan out to buy new autos. Maybe one day if there is no demand for manual I might get the cheque book out. After all it’s all about getting bums on seats and filling the diary which at the moment I’m doing, Are you■■?

Paul :smiley:

@ Tockwith Training

I accept that many learners will want to take the easiest route to a pass certificate and I’ve said before that I don’t blame them, perhaps some people will but personally I don’t blame them at-all, however common-sense suggests that in the hands of a good trainer a well maintained but older vehicle will have far less impact on the trainees chances of passing the test than a new automatic vehicle in the hands of a poor trainer would.

You deride any training company or any training vehicle that does not meet the same specifications as yours, you say of companies that don’t have new automatic vehicles “They don’t deserve your business”, you deride potential trainees as being crazy to want to learn in a manual or crazy not to learn in an automatic, frankly you appear to have quite a contemptuous attitude towards training companies who don’t use new automatic vehicles and potential trainees who want to learn in a manual vehicle.

I’d like to ask you a question if I may.
Given that you seem to deride any trainee who chooses not to go down the automatic vehicle route to a pass and any trainer who chooses to rely on giving good quality training rather than relying on using new automatic vehicles to boost their pass rates, which incidentally I imagine would be most new training companies as well as plenty of more established training companies who choose to keep their prices down, and given that you yourself have said that about 22% of your passes would fail if it wasn’t for you having an automatic vehicle, do you think this reflects on the quality of your training in any way ?