"Heavy Haulage through the years"

Froggy55:

Buzzer:
Buzzer0

Dragging such a load with a 6 LW engine must have been no fun! Neither for the truck’s driver, neither for the following drivers.
Is this a picture taken at a recent show, or back in the 1950s? Then, were solid tyres still allowed in regular use?

Bit more information Froggy picture taken in 1955 going over the old A62. Locomotive was going for export to Western Australia, different gauge to UK railways so road transport.

Buzzer

jshepguis:

Froggy55:

Buzzer:
Buzzer0

Dragging such a load with a 6 LW engine must have been no fun! Neither for the truck’s driver, neither for the following drivers.
Is this a picture taken at a recent show, or back in the 1950s? Then, were solid tyres still allowed in regular use?

Bit more information Froggy picture taken in 1955 going over the old A62. Locomotive was going for export to Western Australia, different gauge to UK railways so road transport.

Would have been narrow (3’6") gauge back then.

Brackmills with a very awkward load.

Star down under.:

jshepguis:

Froggy55:

Buzzer:
Buzzer0

Dragging such a load with a 6 LW engine must have been no fun! Neither for the truck’s driver, neither for the following drivers.
Is this a picture taken at a recent show, or back in the 1950s? Then, were solid tyres still allowed in regular use?

Bit more information Froggy picture taken in 1955 going over the old A62. Locomotive was going for export to Western Australia, different gauge to UK railways so road transport.

Would have been narrow (3’6") gauge back then.

Thanks to both of you for the information! Solid tyres were banned from French roads in 1951.

Credit to Richard Says for the photos.
Oily

Heavy Haul Richard 52031966316_0cd7da8c5f_o.jpg

Michael Coghlan photo at Peterhead South Australia.
Oily

I make that at least 22 cow power. Thank goodness there were no length restrictions in those days, but it does ably demonstrate the advantage of drawbars over artics. No cut in. :wink: :smiley:

Spardo:
I make that at least 22 cow power. Thank goodness there were no length restrictions in those days, but it does ably demonstrate the advantage of drawbars over artics. No cut in. :wink: :smiley:

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Buzzer


Buzzer:
Buzzer

JD another ex McKelvie trailer sorry not a good picture

Buzzer

Buzzer

If you’ve ever wondered how big a ballistic submarine actually is, this is just a section of one of the UK’s new ones being built in Barrow transferring to the final assembly hall. Don’t know what size of engine is in the Transit but must be powerful to pull a rig that size :smiley: :smiley:

Dennis Javelin:
0

If you’ve ever wondered how big a ballistic submarine actually is, this is just a section of one of the UK’s new ones being built in Barrow being moved to the final assembly hall.

That’s a fair lump for a Transit, Dennis. :wink:

Star down under.:

Dennis Javelin:
0

If you’ve ever wondered how big a ballistic submarine actually is, this is just a section of one of the UK’s new ones being built in Barrow being moved to the final assembly hall.

That’s a fair lump for a Transit, Dennis. :wink:

There’s probably another one at the rear pushing :smiley: :smiley:

Dennis Javelin:

Star down under.:

Dennis Javelin:
0

If you’ve ever wondered how big a ballistic submarine actually is, this is just a section of one of the UK’s new ones being built in Barrow being moved to the final assembly hall.

That’s a fair lump for a Transit, Dennis. :wink:

There’s probably another one at the rear pushing :smiley: :smiley:

:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Buzzer