Guy

windrush:

Frankydobo:
Notice the wing mirror position, similar to the Ergo’s and yet I can’t recall them being in that position once on the road, did they get too dirty there, or the screen did so they couldn’t see them easily or did our drivers/fitters decide they were in the wrong place and put them back to the usual view through the door window! Franky.

I moved my Sed Ak 400 nearside mirror forward like that Franky, we did the same with the Foden S80’s using Bedford KM mirror arms! They kept nice and clean then which was the general intention!

Pete.

I also repositioned the mirrors forward on my Humber McVeigh Atkinson,as you said Pete,it kept the mirrors a lot cleaner away from the front wheel spray,never used the bit of a rag trick!!

David

harry_gill:

robert1952:
Big-J out on the open road… Robert

10

Hiya,
Would’ve liked to have seen what was on the Scammell stand in Earls court at that 1971 show, I had
a Scammell “corrugated fronter” from that show as my new motor from that very show, it had more
chromium plated bits you needed dark glasses just to get in the cab and with a perfectly set up 680
engine inboard it went like the proverbial of a shovel.
thanks harry, long retired

OK “H” but how long did the “shiny bits” remain shiny ? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: Cheers Dennis.

Bewick:

harry_gill:

robert1952:
Big-J out on the open road… Robert

10

Hiya,
Would’ve liked to have seen what was on the Scammell stand in Earls court at that 1971 show, I had
a Scammell “corrugated fronter” from that show as my new motor from that very show, it had more
chromium plated bits you needed dark glasses just to get in the cab and with a perfectly set up 680
engine inboard it went like the proverbial of a shovel.
thanks harry, long retired

OK “H” but how long did the “shiny bits” remain shiny ? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: Cheers Dennis.

Hiya,
Well Denniss the irritating bits in the shed lasted until I stole some nail varnish from my sister
and obliterated the bits that reflected in my specs with street lights shining through the glass
I do recall seeing a few rust specks appearing on the bumper before it was six months of age, I
never can remember finding the wash though, it always went well though even when mucky.
thanks harry long retired.

harry_gill:

Bewick:

harry_gill:

robert1952:
Big-J out on the open road… Robert

10

Hiya,
Would’ve liked to have seen what was on the Scammell stand in Earls court at that 1971 show, I had
a Scammell “corrugated fronter” from that show as my new motor from that very show, it had more
chromium plated bits you needed dark glasses just to get in the cab and with a perfectly set up 680
engine inboard it went like the proverbial of a shovel.
thanks harry, long retired

OK “H” but how long did the “shiny bits” remain shiny ? :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: Cheers Dennis.

Hiya,
Well Denniss the irritating bits in the shed lasted until I stole some nail varnish from my sister
and obliterated the bits that reflected in my specs with street lights shining through the glass
I do recall seeing a few rust specks appearing on the bumper before it was six months of age, I
never can remember finding the wash though, it always went well though even when mucky.
thanks harry long retired.

Hi Harry

I think it was 1948 Commercial Motor Show we had a Bedford O model with body by Spurlings as an exhibit. Like you say chrome all over inc rocker cover. Dad collected at Earls Court & when he stopped on way home decided to dip the oil. Nothing on stick as it was chrome plated, so he had to ask another driver if he could borrow his dip stick to check the oil

Carl

Here’s a nice picture of a LHD Belgian Guy Invincible draw-bar outfit. Notice it even has a sleeper cab! Perhaps Astran should have started out with this version!

I’ve never really worked out the difference between a Warrior and an Invincible because there were ‘light’ Warriors with multiple axle configurations. Can anyone shed a light on this for me? Robert :question:

Belgian Invincible LHD sleeper.jpg

I thought that Warriors were AEC 505s and Invisibles were Gardeners/■■■■■■■■

jeffrey ellener:
I thought that Warriors were AEC 505s and Invisibles were Gardeners/■■■■■■■■

Cheers! The 1966 Observers Book lists Warriors with engines supplied by BMC, Leyland, AEC or Gardner. The Invincible is only listed with Gardner 6LX. Perhaps it was more to do with the gross weight-range…

Peter Davies’s encylopedia says that the Invincible had AEC chassis engineering and Gardner or Meadows power plant but that in 1958 the chassis was completely renewed as a heavy-duty vehicle. Robert

robert1952:

jeffrey ellener:
I thought that Warriors were AEC 505s and Invisibles were Gardeners/■■■■■■■■

Cheers! The 1966 Observers Book lists Warriors with engines supplied by BMC, Leyland, AEC or Gardner. The Invincible is only listed with Gardner 6LX. Perhaps it was more to do with the gross weight-range…

Peter Davies’s encylopedia says that the Invincible had AEC chassis engineering and Gardner or Meadows power plant but that in 1958 the chassis was completely renewed as a heavy-duty vehicle. Robert

We had a Guy Warrior at Humbers with a ■■■■■■■ in it,ran well too

David

robert1952:

jeffrey ellener:
I thought that Warriors were AEC 505s and Invisibles were Gardeners/■■■■■■■■

Cheers! The 1966 Observers Book lists Warriors with engines supplied by BMC, Leyland, AEC or Gardner. The Invincible is only listed with Gardner 6LX. Perhaps it was more to do with the gross weight-range…

Peter Davies’s encylopedia says that the Invincible had AEC chassis engineering and Gardner or Meadows power plant but that in 1958 the chassis was completely renewed as a heavy-duty vehicle. Robert

The Invincible tractor units also fitted the early ■■■■■■■ NH180 engine.

Bewick:

robert1952:

jeffrey ellener:
I thought that Warriors were AEC 505s and Invisibles were Gardeners/■■■■■■■■

Cheers! The 1966 Observers Book lists Warriors with engines supplied by BMC, Leyland, AEC or Gardner. The Invincible is only listed with Gardner 6LX. Perhaps it was more to do with the gross weight-range…

Peter Davies’s encylopedia says that the Invincible had AEC chassis engineering and Gardner or Meadows power plant but that in 1958 the chassis was completely renewed as a heavy-duty vehicle. Robert

The Invincible tractor units also fitted the early ■■■■■■■ NH180 engine.

Cheers Bewick! That doesn’t sound like a bad combination… Robert :smiley:

Robert from what I read into it the range initially was Warrior 4 wheeler, Warrior Light 6 and 8 both either 6x2, 6x4 and 8x2, 8x4 then similar with the Invincible range, I suspect the Invincible having a heavier chassis build and therefore bigger engine, heavier axles as opposed to the ‘Light’ Warriors which seem to have had a bigger choice of lighter engines. The Observers book doesn’t list the Invincible as a Tractor, only as Truck and Tipper chassis but I have pics of Invincible Tractors so not sure of the omission there as these little books tended to be quite accurate in the early days, I also wonder if the Light range was discontinued after a short period. Cheers Franky.

Frankydobo:
Robert from what I read into it the range initially was Warrior 4 wheeler, Warrior Light 6 and 8 both either 6x2, 6x4 and 8x2, 8x4 then similar with the Invincible range, I suspect the Invincible having a heavier chassis build and therefore bigger engine, heavier axles as opposed to the ‘Light’ Warriors which seem to have had a bigger choice of lighter engines. The Observers book doesn’t list the Invincible as a Tractor, only as Truck and Tipper chassis but I have pics of Invincible Tractors so not sure of the omission there as these little books tended to be quite accurate in the early days, I also wonder if the Light range was discontinued after a short period. Cheers Franky.

I know that Invicibles were also artics A.One and Archbolds ran them . A.One mainly Gardner’s Archbold mainly ■■■■■■■ .Best regards Jeff.

If Guy were as anything like as vague as ERF in naming their products we’ll probably never make sense of it! :laughing: I certainly remember seeing Invincible tractive units when I was a schoolboy. Robert

Lorries from that era were clearly categorised by the manufacturers into light weight, medium weight, and heavy weight specifications to cope with the unladen weight demands of the ‘A’ Licence (Quantity) carriers permit scheme. Guy had, for example, its Otter or Vixen light weights, Warrior medium weights, and Invincible heavy weights. What “category” the operators used them at in the real world of haulage was a different matter entirely. In Guy’s case it only became vague when it launched the Big J range which covered both medium weight and heavy weight models and pulled out of the light weight category. Personally I always preferred lorries to have model names but such as ERF always used numbers, which are logical and easy to interpret if you know the codes. Seddon was also logical with its model numbers, for example Seddon 14/4/400 equates to a 14 tons gvw 2-axle rigid with a Leyland Power-Plus O.400 engine. Seddon 30/4/690 equates to a 30 tons gtw 2-axle tractor unit with an AEC 2AV690 engine. (Sorry I’ve used Seddon as the example rather than ERF as you mention, but I’m a bit rusty on ERF model numbers these days as I didn’t have any hands-on experience of them in the '60s/'70s, having cut my teeth on Leylands, AECs, and Seddons).

gingerfold:
Lorries from that era were clearly categorised by the manufacturers into light weight, medium weight, and heavy weight specifications to cope with the unladen weight demands of the ‘A’ Licence (Quantity) carriers permit scheme. Guy had, for example, its Otter or Vixen light weights, Warrior medium weights, and Invincible heavy weights. What “category” the operators used them at in the real world of haulage was a different matter entirely. In Guy’s case it only became vague when it launched the Big J range which covered both medium weight and heavy weight models and pulled out of the light weight category. Personally I always preferred lorries to have model names but such as ERF always used numbers, which are logical and easy to interpret if you know the codes. Seddon was also logical with its model numbers, for example Seddon 14/4/400 equates to a 14 tons gvw 2-axle rigid with a Leyland Power-Plus O.400 engine. Seddon 30/4/690 equates to a 30 tons gtw 2-axle tractor unit with an AEC 2AV690 engine. (Sorry I’ve used Seddon as the example rather than ERF as you mention, but I’m a bit rusty on ERF model numbers these days as I didn’t have any hands-on experience of them in the '60s/'70s, having cut my teeth on Leylands, AECs, and Seddons).

That’s most helpful, Gingerfold and of course I had forgotten about the old licence system and hadn’t factored that into my thinking. ERF were only logical up to the early '70s, when they appeared to drop their coding system and began randomly naming models after their cabs, after their chassis etc. Robert :slight_smile:

When you think about it,apart from Leyland Motors who just used their own engines in the 50’s/60’s era the other manufactures ERF,Atkinson,Foden,Guy,Scammell,Seddon, Dodge and to a lesser extent Bedford used a variety of engines such as AEC, Gardner,■■■■■■■■ Perkins,Meadows and of course Leyland who supplied Scammell,Guy,Foden,Dodge,Bedford,Seddon and Albion(who also used their own engines)I think AEC and Ford were the only other manufactures to stick with their own engines during the period.During this era Leyland were quite a prolific supplier of what would be termed “loose engines” maybe on a par with Gardner and Perkins.Now where is “Saviem” when you require his valuable well crafted input :wink: Cheers Bewick.

Afternoon Gentlemen, cold, miserable old January day, not improved by having to spend several hours in our local A&E,having performed, (what is described to me by a bystander)," as the most perfect back flip, and dive he had ever seen"…only sadly my landing was not into some sunkissed Mediteranian swimming pool, but onto a rather solid strip of the A449.

How so?..excess consumption of Bollinger?..practice for audition as a Trapeze artiste in Cirque Togini?..to impress some passing Damsel.?..(are there any left)■■?..Mais non, just trying to get back into the saddle of my Deere, having fixed a non revolving beacon on her trailer, but the old Sciatica, and Rheumatism got me quite sharp just as I reached the third, (step to Heaven)? and the involuntary spasm occasioned my artistic performance take place!

Realising that the copious red stain was not, (thank goodness), a diesel leak, and that it was getting more viscus, I elected to drive myself to the local A&E…Now we all know about Hospital parking…and as there was nowhere designated for a combination such as mine…I parked neatly in a loading bay, and hot footed into A&E, looking rather like a guilty mass murderer

Several hours later, welded up, and semi repaired, I returned to find two white “Security vans”, 4 bullet headed thugs, and a feeble looking wheel clamp, which they were attempting to fit to one wheel of the trailer bogie…the Deere having defeated them as it is a tracked machine!!! …Oh, I forgot to mention that my trailer contained around, (honestly Officer), 14 tonnes of Sewage sludge, which by now had started to defrost nicely, and magically was adhering with some success to said thugs clothing.

As they were all staring into the rear of one of their vans, I limped into my cab, started up, and drove away, leaving behind the assembled throng…all of which has nothing at all to do with Guy lorries, but is the reason that my contribution may be rather brief…I feel a bit “peeky”, at the moment!

As if my morning was not enough…when I now attempt to post the system requests that I log on…despite being logged on!..I`m getting too old for this!

On page 2 of this thread I tried to explain the relationship between Guy, and AEC, the closeness of senior staff, the collaboration, and the correct decision by Guy to move away from the lighter end of the market. But no collaboration could have been closer than that between Sydney Guy, and Henry Meadows. They may have occupied adjacent sites at Fallings Park, but there was a close personal friendship between the two men,(Guy gave Meadows one of his V8 Guy motor cars, Meadows liked this so much that he retained it until his death. The same car was enjoyed by a certain T E Lawrence, who stayed with Meadows whil`st finalising the design of a new Air Sea Rescue launch for the Navy, in the 1930s).

Meadows diesels were successfull in Guys bus chassis, but less so in the haulage models. Operators finding the products of Patricroft gave better service and economy, despite the lower power output. True the Goliath, later named Invincible, a Guy bus name, range was almost pure AEC, (AECs chief engineer being an ex Guy man), but Guy redesigned certain features to suit their ideal specification. Then of course came the beautiful Invincible, with Trevor Dudleys cab design based on US car theme. But the chassis, total Guy design, but pressed by Guys original backer, when he left the employ of Sunbeam, Rubery Owen, was both simple, and rugged in engineered design.

gingerfold neatly summed up the dilemma facing manufacturers, they build for a market sector, but the operator sees an advantage in “adapting” a design to suit their requirements…only good basic engineering can cope with that…(and in todays highly regulated world…well it is almost impossible to do)!

TGBs Warrior light 8, started the trend for Guy operators, then the Factory adapted the design…pity the little AEC470, lugging the payload that was “legal”, but it did it , and came back for more. But that steel and fibreglass cab was a star, originally designed to tilt from the waist, but lacking structural integrity, like Charbonneaux`s Television cab for Bernard, Guy finally resolved the issue by making the top half “easily” unboltable.Funny to think that the technology in creating the mouldings for that cab led Guy to diversify into manufacturing swimming pools!!!

Do any of you Gentlemen remember the Broadcaster, Raymond Baxters, “live” Radio transmission along side the 64 Guy Motor Show exhibit Invincible`s driver, as she was driven from Fallings Park to London? The lorry really was the star of that show! That cab stood up well to hard work, and I remember enjoying driving my Uncles (well worn) Warrior 6 wheeler up and down to South Wales. Sedate, yes, but the brakes gave you confidence, and Mr AEC as ever was just reliable…Far removed from the ear splitting calcophony generated by a ■■■■■■■ 180 engined Invincible that I unwisely paid far too much for, and" po go" sticked back from sunny Dudley to Shropshire…with my tail well between my legs!!!

There is far more to write regarding Guy, and Meadows, their alignment together in William Lyons manufacturing empire, and the plans that never were fully realised for both operations. But a Police car has just driven into our yard, I have a feeling I may be required!!

Cheerio for now.

Great to have you back, Saviem. The “log in” request was due to the site having crashed while you were away on other duties.
As you say, there was very little to compare with AEC engines- my little Mercury performed brilliantly, always loaded to 24 tons with a tandem axle trailer.
I’m sure we all hope that The Force was not with you for too long and that the sciatica will allow you to sweeten the officers with a bag of your inferior Maris Pipers.

Saviem, you are a natural born story-teller, leaving the reader in suspense and waiting impatiently for the next enthralling episode of your escapades…please update soon about dealings with Mr (or Ms) Plod, unless of course you are denied access to your computer in police custody. Always remember, you are allowed that one 'phone call. Good luck and your TN supporters are rooting for you. :wink: :wink: :wink:

P.S. What has Mrs Saviem got to say about this latest “mishap”?