Every coach drivers worst nightmare

oldsid:

DonutUK:
Absolutely horrific.

We had one of ours coming back from Austria overnight, so it caused a bit of concern when the news was first breaking.

This is why i always break the overnight drives into 2.5 hr stints when double manned. No need to macho out 4.5 hrs at a time when there are 2 of you.

In March we have some of ours doing 10 days in Austria, coming back overnight, having 24 hrs in Dover, then going down to Salou, which i think is pretty irresponsible of the company. There are enough of us to cover the work without having to do that.
The problem is that the coach manager has her little favourites who she has given all the European work to this year, despite over half of them having no experience of driving in Europe. One of them was driving bin wagons until 5 months ago…just think it is an accident waiting to happen.

Still, if i’m honest, i’m glad i’m not doing the ski runs this year, they really are a major ball ache.

Forgive my scepticism but 2.5 hours driving alternating with another driver still leaves you knackered after youve done it a few times and youve been on shift for 18 or nineteen hours. Its the principle of extending one persons working day by slotting someone else in the middle of it that is the most outrageous concept I think, We as truck drivers have had our spreadover extended over the years and thats bad enough but this especially when conveying people is an absolute travisty, no two ways about it.

Never said it beats all the fatigue, however, what is does do is to break the driving into manageable chunks, with plenty of pitstops to grab a quick coffee etc.

Nothing wrong with the double manning principle providing both drivers are adequately rested prior to starting out. This, imho, is where the problems lies. If you have ever done ski work, you will know that departure day does not mean a day in bed for the drivers. It means getting up, after a normal nights sleep, around 0700, breakfast, loading the coach for departure, then ferrying the group somewhere, then back to the hotel for your 9 hrs rest, before tea and setting out for home around 1900-2000’ish.
So, after having had a nights sleep on the previous night, you are now expected to sleep again after only being up for 2 or 3 hrs? Of course that doesn’t happen. What happens is you might grab a couple of hours in the afternoon, but otherwise you drive back after having been awake for most the day.
You do a 14 hr drive from Austria to Dover, on top of being awake for the previous 12 or 13 hours. And then you might even drive another 3 or 4’s home in the car that your feeder driver came down in…unless you are lucky and your company has booked you a room in Dover for the night. Even then, some drivers prefer to slog on home.
All perfectly legal as it is within the 21 hr spreadover for double manning.

No one ever seems to talk about the fact that driver sleepiness = very often having to work for too many hours to get a decent wage! If anyone is fully rested (previous day’s shift was 8 hours, today is 8 hours etc) then no one is going to be falling asleep at the wheel unless they are narcoleptic or paryletic - either way, they’re not likely to have the licence in the first place!

I doubt very much this guy was doing anything remotely dodgy the night before. Boring run, & long hours that’s all I reckon there is to it, and therefore it could have happened to anyone. :frowning:

Where does the non-driving person sleep when he’s on his daily rest - he says expecting the answer “on the seat behind the one that’s driving at present!”

Do coach firms put up their drivers in motels? Does the next driver to take over actually first board the bus at the next stop, having not been on board for 8+ hours already? Does any firm employ two drivers at either end so any one only drives the single leg?

I’ve not heard or seen much that suggests to me that going PSV would be better career development than going all the way with ADR and carrying nitroglycerin instead… :frowning:

I find it nearly impossible to sleep whilst double manning. Sitting up isn’t good for you whilst trying to sleep. I find that I spent almost 2 days awake constantly. Not good. :imp:

DonutUK.

If you seriously think there is nothing wrong with the double manning hours arrangement as permitted at present you have some strange ideas about what’s healthy. Would you be quite happy to have complex surgery done by a guy who’s been operating or assisting operations for almost 21hrs? Would you prepare for an importand event by going almost 24 hrs without sleep before it? The human body likes routine and that routine revolves around a 24hrs cycle because that is what nature gives us. Yes, maybe on special occasions we can cheat the system and stay awake, many do at events like festivals, a birth, in war zones or after a shock. But for double manning it is expected to be the norm. Just plain wrong and IMO, the people who allow it (Transport ministry and euro equiv) should be charged with wreckless endangerment if tiredness is found to be the cause of this incident.

My brothers mate used to drive coaches, taking kids up to London to see the museums, or the zoo or whatever they fancied at the time. He would take about 50 kids, on a coach with no belts up to the destination, park up bored all day, sometimes would be lucky and go to do an airport pick up of a large party, then go and fetch the kids back to the school, all screaming hyped up on excitement and Fruit Shoots! He would drop them off and go back to the yard. How much would you expect this driver who we entrust the lives of our children with, gets payed by the hour?

£6.24!!!

I sometimes wonder where our thinking comes from on this. I know the companies need to be competeive and make a profit, but I would pay extra to know that my little darlings are being driven around by a bloke who is happy with his job and pay, not by someone who spends all day thinking about the money he is not getting and is probably not on the ball. Coach drivers with kids on, should get a premium end of!

There is something that should be an epetition!

xtruckerlady:
First of all my sympathy to all involved in this tragic incident, including the families of those injured and killed, as well as the driver and the owners of the coach company. RIP Peter Rivington.

Rippington, not Rivington. Your condolences would have more meaning if they were aimed at the right person.

theonlybigman:
My brothers mate used to drive coaches, taking kids up to London to see the museums, or the zoo or whatever they fancied at the time. He would take about 50 kids, on a coach with no belts up to the destination, park up bored all day, sometimes would be lucky and go to do an airport pick up of a large party, then go and fetch the kids back to the school, all screaming hyped up on excitement and Fruit Shoots! He would drop them off and go back to the yard. How much would you expect this driver who we entrust the lives of our children with, gets payed by the hour?

£6.24!!!

I sometimes wonder where our thinking comes from on this. I know the companies need to be competeive and make a profit, but I would pay extra to know that my little darlings are being driven around by a bloke who is happy with his job and pay, not by someone who spends all day thinking about the money he is not getting and is probably not on the ball. Coach drivers with kids on, should get a premium end of!

There is something that should be an epetition!

I started at my last coach firm in 2007 and left not long ago for a truck job that went wrong. Not long after I started on the coaches the pay went up from £7.50 to £7.75 an hour. That wasn’t a bad rate for '07 but it was the last pay rise any of us saw there.

You are right that for the responsibility and problems a coach driver goes through the money isn’t anywhere near what it should be.

The firm I worked for (and am still on part time with) takes the trouble to invest in new vehicles and won’t scrimp on maintainence, I never in 5 years was faced with a job that could have run illegal, they’re 100% spot on. But they’re not all like that. All of the other firms round here are running older vehicles and fight for every single job by cutting the quote to the bone. A lot of them are running just for the sake of turning over money and paying wages. My old firm was losing jobs for the sake of a fiver or a tenner. A school won’t visit the coach company or look for the best coaches and drivers and consider the safety of the kids, they’ll go with the cheapest every time. The difference between your kids going on a newish well looked after vehicle driven by a good smartly dressed experienced driver or an old banger with questionable spanner work being driven by some Stagefright or LastGroup reject with no idea where he’s going could be as little as £5 PER VEHICLE!!!

If some of you think haulage is cut throat you really have to see how coach firms battle it out for work, it would make your hair stand on end.

The bosses cut each other’s throats to get the job, drivers don’t get a pay rise because there is no cash in the pot, experienced drivers who used to care re-train and bail out of the industry to earn a living wage and things go in ever decreasing circles.

For less money than most Aldi shelf stackers get the long hours, responsibility, noise, and up to 2 hours post trip cleaning the coach inside and out it really isn’t worth it.

Not much new blood going into the coach industry either, when I left my last place I was the youngest there. I’m 41. Most are over 60, half of them are not bothering with the DCPC.

DoYouMeanMe?:
DonutUK.

If you seriously think there is nothing wrong with the double manning hours arrangement as permitted at present you have some strange ideas about what’s healthy. Would you be quite happy to have complex surgery done by a guy who’s been operating or assisting operations for almost 21hrs? Would you prepare for an importand event by going almost 24 hrs without sleep before it? The human body likes routine and that routine revolves around a 24hrs cycle because that is what nature gives us. Yes, maybe on special occasions we can cheat the system and stay awake, many do at events like festivals, a birth, in war zones or after a shock. But for double manning it is expected to be the norm. Just plain wrong and IMO, the people who allow it (Transport ministry and euro equiv) should be charged with wreckless endangerment if tiredness is found to be the cause of this incident.

x2

Sir +:
Apparently lots of coaches nowadays don’t have bunkms.Courier seat and feet on dash :confused: Why would that be ? I have had many a furiously good 4hr sleep in a coach bunk.

Our new 61 plate Irizar thingy has a bunk, but the boss bought the demonastration one…
Have you ever tried sitting for more than 5 minutes on a courier seat? Not the comfiest, no leg room, so feet on the dash it is…

DAF95XF:

Sir +:
Apparently lots of coaches nowadays don’t have bunkms.Courier seat and feet on dash :confused: Why would that be ? I have had many a furiously good 4hr sleep in a coach bunk.

Our new 61 plate Irizar thingy has a bunk, but the boss bought the demonastration one…
Have you ever tried sitting for more than 5 minutes on a courier seat? Not the comfiest, no leg room, so feet on the dash it is…

If it’s an Irizar PB/i6 they are by a long way the most uncomfortable courier seats out there. Only decent ones I’ve sat in of the modern generation is in the Van Hool.

AndyH71:

DAF95XF:

Sir +:
Apparently lots of coaches nowadays don’t have bunkms.Courier seat and feet on dash :confused: Why would that be ? I have had many a furiously good 4hr sleep in a coach bunk.

Our new 61 plate Irizar thingy has a bunk, but the boss bought the demonastration one…
Have you ever tried sitting for more than 5 minutes on a courier seat? Not the comfiest, no leg room, so feet on the dash it is…

If it’s an Irizar PB/i6 they are by a long way the most uncomfortable courier seats out there. Only decent ones I’ve sat in of the modern generation is in the Van Hool.

I think it is an i6, well thats what it says on the side anyway…!!!