jakethesnake:
Keep up the good work Franglais. You are doing a grand job of proving the truth and some good banter between you and RR.
Thanks, 
but I don`t post for any praise.
I really enjoy being restricted in my movements, having to wear masks, and having to see relatives and strangers suffer. It is all part of my unhealthy obsession.
At least that is what the self appointed resident TNUK psychoanalysts sayâŚ
â â â â â â â â
Franglais:
I really enjoy being restricted in my movements, having to wear masks, and having to see relatives and strangers suffer. It is all part of my unhealthy obsession.
At last.
Thatâs the way Frangers, go down the Alchoholics anonymous type route and face up to your demons.
My nameâs Franglais, and I AM a Covid Obsessive. 
robroy:
Franglais:
I really enjoy being restricted in my movements, having to wear masks, and having to see relatives and strangers suffer. It is all part of my unhealthy obsession.At last.
Thatâs the way Frangers, go down the Alchoholics anonymous type route and face up to your demons.My nameâs Franglais, and I AM a Covid Obsessive.
stu675:
Carryfast:
stu675:
Welcome to natural full strength immunity. Youâll be fineIf thereâs any immunity to it how can you catch it more than once.
Thereâs been no confirmed cases of people catching it twice ( confirmed by sequencing both infections)
Infection to Cov-Sars1 from 20 years ago gives you immunity against Cov-Sars2. It stands to reason ( itâs the science!) That infection gives you immunity. Thereâs too many false positive PCR tests to dispute immunity.
Strange how at least one of my relatives and his wife and his son have all caught it twice with symptoms and positive tests to match.As for false positive PCR doubt it lateral flow maybe.
nhs.uk/conditions/coronaviru ⌠oms-again/
science.org/content/article/ ⌠ickly-some
health.clevelandclinic.org/can- ⌠than-once/
While for me after 15 days with little improvement just adds to my original view that it probably doesnât even clear at all.At best it just goes into hiding and remission at which point weâre just carriers until it breaks out again.A bit like chickenpox v shingles.
My dad thinks he has caught covid off me. He is such a drama queenâŚ
He has a cold but the way he acts its like he has a terminal illness. Until I annoy him lol 
But anyway, you notice how the baby boomers once again benefit from covid?
Not only did they get to be apart of the golden generation of cheap housing and fantastic opportunties. they get to retire early. etc etc
They also got to isolate on pretty much full pay. And we ALL have to isolate to protect the baby boomers even though most of the young people are not at risk from covid.
I spent 9 months doing a degree course online⌠Why? the oldest guy in my class was like 38.
Oh, and they also get top prio for the covid vaccine. And now some young people dont want the vaccine there is talk about stripping their freedoms away so the boomers can be safe
adam277:
My dad thinks he has caught covid off me. He is such a drama queenâŚ
He has a cold but the way he acts its like he has a terminal illness. Until I annoy him lolBut anyway, you notice how the baby boomers once again benefit from covid?
Not only did they get to be apart of the golden generation of cheap housing and fantastic opportunties. they get to retire early. etc etc
They also got to isolate on pretty much full pay. And we ALL have to isolate to protect the baby boomers even though most of the young people are not at risk from covid.
I spent 9 months doing a degree course online⌠Why? the oldest guy in my class was like 38.Oh, and they also get top prio for the covid vaccine. And now some young people dont want the vaccine there is talk about stripping their freedoms away so the boomers can be safe
You are right of course.
We have made a pact with the Devil.
In return for sacrificing some of our number, canceling our holidays, Christmas ruined, and generally being put uponâŚ
We get to â â â â you kids off! RESULT!
Franglais:
adam277:
My dad thinks he has caught covid off me. He is such a drama queenâŚ
He has a cold but the way he acts its like he has a terminal illness. Until I annoy him lolBut anyway, you notice how the baby boomers once again benefit from covid?
Not only did they get to be apart of the golden generation of cheap housing and fantastic opportunties. they get to retire early. etc etc
They also got to isolate on pretty much full pay. And we ALL have to isolate to protect the baby boomers even though most of the young people are not at risk from covid.
I spent 9 months doing a degree course online⌠Why? the oldest guy in my class was like 38.Oh, and they also get top prio for the covid vaccine. And now some young people dont want the vaccine there is talk about stripping their freedoms away so the boomers can be safe
You are right of course.
We have made a pact with the Devil.
In return for sacrificing some of our number, canceling our holidays, Christmas ruined, and generally being put uponâŚ
We get to â â â â you kids off! RESULT!
To be fair the majority of boomers that died due to covid were the once that did not want to get vaxxed due to thinking it was linked to 5G and China
youtube.com/watch?v=2hekDuCBxCc
this sums up my thoughts pretty much 
Franglais:
The evidence strongly shows otherwise. (Including whole genome sequencing)
More than one infection is possible with many viruses, and indeed happens frequently.
Vaccines are supposed to work by training an immune response memory which generally means a permanent memory and response that kills it before it gets a hold on the body including stopping transmission.That obviously wonât work if thereâs no memory there to train.
Which by definition means that itâs not a vaccine as we know it and any virus which can evade an immune response memory, even with vaccination is an, anything but âfrequentâ, exception to the rule.
The question in this case is âwhyâ is it such an âexceptionâ.Exactly which other viruses can we catch and transmit after weâve been vaccinated against them and which would sort of make any âvaccinationâ against them moot.
Which seems to be what the doctor was saying.Although Iâve never believed that it is a âvaccineâ and I think I know why thereâs no immunity against it and I think the government also knows.Which is why the government had no problem with airing his view because he didnât dare to go down that rabbit hole.
adam277:
My dad thinks he has caught covid off me. He is such a drama queenâŚ
He has a cold but the way he acts its like he has a terminal illness. Until I annoy him lolBut anyway, you notice how the baby boomers once again benefit from covid?
Not only did they get to be apart of the golden generation of cheap housing and fantastic opportunties. they get to retire early. etc etc
They also got to isolate on pretty much full pay. And we ALL have to isolate to protect the baby boomers even though most of the young people are not at risk from covid.
I spent 9 months doing a degree course online⌠Why? the oldest guy in my class was like 38.Oh, and they also get top prio for the covid vaccine. And now some young people dont want the vaccine there is talk about stripping their freedoms away so the boomers can be safe
As I remember it those âopportunitiesâ were the legacy that their WW2 generation parents left them.As in take no zb from the government, strike at the drop of a hat to keep wages ahead of inflation and donât give away our jobs and resources to a Communist slave labour state and be prepared to face nuclear oblivion rather than hand over our share of the cake, in that regard.
As opposed to the compliant Thatcher and what came after her generations.
As for Covid Iâd rather face it with the help of 3 AZ shots than none whether I was 20 or 75.Strange how the government wonât allow anyone of any age to have the third one for some reason.
chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor ⌠w-19856393
Double vaccinated worse than unvaccinated = âwaning immunityâ obviously doesnât add up more like an oxymoron.
Carryfast:
Double vaccinated worse than unvaccinated = âwaning immunityâ obviously doesnât add up more like an oxymoron.
Apples and Oranges.
Is there waning immunity after vaccines or being infected? It appears so, from many pieces Iâve seen. No shock at all.
Hey! Thatâs why we have the âboosterâ!
.
The article mentions more problems for the elderly, and other articles have said that the elderly are more likely to be double or triple jabbed, therefore the article seems to be comparing infection rates in different age groups.
I certainly donât know if that is or isnât the case, but a short piece in a newspaper without any reference to sources isnât much to go on, is it?
Unless any date analysis makes allowance for differing uptake of vaccine in different groups, (and assuming the journalists know what âratesâ means) it is not too surprising.
.
The piece also says it is relative to Glasgow. No other areas?
So, is that a large case population? Is it repeated elsewhere? Is it just a blip that is perfectly normal if one looks at the many different hospitals around the UK? One outlier?
Or is it a journo looking for a headline?
.
Worth looking at for those with the tools to understand what is going on. Not so much for the rest of us, maybe?
Franglais:
Carryfast:
Double vaccinated worse than unvaccinated = âwaning immunityâ obviously doesnât add up more like an oxymoron.
Apples and Oranges.
Is there waning immunity after vaccines or being infected? It appears so, from many pieces Iâve seen. No shock at all.
Hey! Thatâs why we have the âboosterâ!
.
The article mentions more problems for the elderly, and other articles have said that the elderly are more likely to be double or triple jabbed, therefore the article seems to be comparing infection rates in different age groups.
I certainly donât know if that is or isnât the case, but a short piece in a newspaper without any reference to sources isnât much to go on, is it?
Unless any date analysis makes allowance for differing uptake of vaccine in different groups, (and assuming the journalists know what âratesâ means) it is not too surprising.
.
The piece also says it is relative to Glasgow. No other areas?
So, is that a large case population? Is it repeated elsewhere? Is it just a blip that is perfectly normal if one looks at the many different hospitals around the UK? One outlier?
Or is it a journo looking for a headline?
.
Worth looking at for those with the tools to understand what is going on. Not so much for the rest of us, maybe?
And true to form a man puts up a link and the usual suspect disses it I expect if you dig deep enough youâll find that there is a conservative somewhere in the journalists family thereby renedering anything they say as wrong. The journalist will have more than likely researched his figures and they are probably quite easy to obtain from the hospital admissisions list which if Glasgow is anything like Derry are released every day with a breakdown of age group and whether they are vaccinated or not, the papers editor will then approved the article and if they felt it was iffey no doubt asked the writer to prove his case.
Mazzer2:
Franglais:
Carryfast:
Double vaccinated worse than unvaccinated = âwaning immunityâ obviously doesnât add up more like an oxymoron.
Apples and Oranges.
Is there waning immunity after vaccines or being infected? It appears so, from many pieces Iâve seen. No shock at all.
Hey! Thatâs why we have the âboosterâ!
.
The article mentions more problems for the elderly, and other articles have said that the elderly are more likely to be double or triple jabbed, therefore the article seems to be comparing infection rates in different age groups.
I certainly donât know if that is or isnât the case, but a short piece in a newspaper without any reference to sources isnât much to go on, is it?
Unless any date analysis makes allowance for differing uptake of vaccine in different groups, (and assuming the journalists know what âratesâ means) it is not too surprising.
.
The piece also says it is relative to Glasgow. No other areas?
So, is that a large case population? Is it repeated elsewhere? Is it just a blip that is perfectly normal if one looks at the many different hospitals around the UK? One outlier?
Or is it a journo looking for a headline?
.
Worth looking at for those with the tools to understand what is going on. Not so much for the rest of us, maybe?And true to form a man puts up a link and the usual suspect disses it I expect if you dig deep enough youâll find that there is a conservative somewhere in the journalists family thereby renedering anything they say as wrong. The journalist will have more than likely researched his figures and they are probably quite easy to obtain from the hospital admissisions list which if Glasgow is anything like Derry are released every day with a breakdown of age group and whether they are vaccinated or not, the papers editor will then approved the article and if they felt it was iffey no doubt asked the writer to prove his case.
Of course!
News papers always print the accurate truth, donât they?
Juddian:
0
And a link to the full article here:
news.com.au/national/nsw-ac ⌠e2d5744d1a
And a quote from it:
âAround 93 per cent of adults in NSW have now been fully vaccinated, leaving around 7 per cent of the population not entirely protected.
Despite making up a small proportion of the wider community, these 7 per cent now account for more than half of all ICU admissions.â
Doctor talking about not wanting to be forced to take the vaccine with the health sec
youtu.be/Kh2vWO58sj4
youtu.be/hOlEYcd1nyI
Franglais:
Juddian:
0And a link to the full article here:
news.com.au/national/nsw-ac ⌠e2d5744d1aAnd a quote from it:
âAround 93 per cent of adults in NSW have now been fully vaccinated, leaving around 7 per cent of the population not entirely protected.
Despite making up a small proportion of the wider community, these 7 per cent now account for more than half of all ICU admissions.â
You continue to research the wrong news outlets. All with the same narrative to keep this bs going.
English driver 1970:
Franglais:
Juddian:
0And a link to the full article here:
news.com.au/national/nsw-ac ⌠e2d5744d1aAnd a quote from it:
âAround 93 per cent of adults in NSW have now been fully vaccinated, leaving around 7 per cent of the population not entirely protected.
Despite making up a small proportion of the wider community, these 7 per cent now account for more than half of all ICU admissions.âYou continue to research the wrong news outlets. All with the same narrative to keep this bs going.
Juddian put the article* up firstâŚBlame himâŚ
The News Outlet contained a direct video of the NSW Chief Health Officer, on Sky Australia.
And once again you â â â â scorn on figures provided but offer none yourself.
I`ve asked for your figures more than once and received nowt.
Once again you are merely shouting âOH, No it`s notâ!
Even the Westminster Pantomime Troupe can do a little better than that. (sometimes).
.
*Or a screen shot, if not the whole thing.
Franglais:
Mazzer2:
Franglais:
Apples and Oranges.Is there waning immunity after vaccines or being infected? It appears so, from many pieces Iâve seen. No shock at all.
Hey! Thatâs why we have the âboosterâ!
.
The article mentions more problems for the elderly, and other articles have said that the elderly are more likely to be double or triple jabbed, therefore the article seems to be comparing infection rates in different age groups.
I certainly donât know if that is or isnât the case, but a short piece in a newspaper without any reference to sources isnât much to go on, is it?
Unless any date analysis makes allowance for differing uptake of vaccine in different groups, (and assuming the journalists know what âratesâ means) it is not too surprising.
.
The piece also says it is relative to Glasgow. No other areas?
So, is that a large case population? Is it repeated elsewhere? Is it just a blip that is perfectly normal if one looks at the many different hospitals around the UK? One outlier?
Or is it a journo looking for a headline?
.
Worth looking at for those with the tools to understand what is going on. Not so much for the rest of us, maybe?And true to form a man puts up a link and the usual suspect disses it I expect if you dig deep enough youâll find that there is a conservative somewhere in the journalists family thereby renedering anything they say as wrong. The journalist will have more than likely researched his figures and they are probably quite easy to obtain from the hospital admissisions list which if Glasgow is anything like Derry are released every day with a breakdown of age group and whether they are vaccinated or not, the papers editor will then approved the article and if they felt it was iffey no doubt asked the writer to prove his case.
Of course!
News papers always print the accurate truth, donât they?
As someone who sits midway between Djokovic and Franglais on the scale of Covid extremism I fail to see what is so controversial in the article, to an obessive covid fanatic the journalist may have blasphemed and be deserving of a Fatwa personally I canât see it myself. It would appear that the journalist made the schoolboy of not sending his article to a lorry driver living in the South of England who in all likelihood knows next to nothing about living in Glasgow and about the same about journalism to be fact checked, cross referenced and proof read before persenting it to his editor who more then likely does know about living in Glasgow and journalism. I donât know a great deal about being a journalist but I do know that there are guidelines in place as to what they can or cannot print and as to whether it is an opinion piece or fact unlike the internet which is a free for all yet where you seem to get the majority of your links from I know what I would trust more.
