bestbooties:
To my way of thinking, this [zb] is as bad as the politician caught taking drugs with prostitutes on taxpayer’s money, seems most [zb] with more money than sense have no morals whatsoever!
It’s not really a question of morals.There’s something scary about an obvious mental health flaw in a sadistic mindset which likes killing things for fun.Which in this case goes even further in the form of using a crossbow/bow and arrows to obviously cause even more unnecessary suffering to the animal by seriously wounding it instead of at least just shooting it in the head with a hunting rifle.
Apparently after arrowing him they then had to hound him for the next 40 hours to finally shoot him behead and skin.
Would love to know how many of those who find (like me) what this pen is did
morally repugnant have no problem with the global Holocaust that is the abortion of millions of unwanted human children.
There’s no real connection.IE that issue is simply one of morals ( life begins at conception not birth and the right to life of the unborn child ).
As opposed to in this case the mental health issue of ■■■■■■ and killing for fun.When,as can often be seen in Southern Europe,the two things can be mixed on the basis of double standards regards human life v animal which is seen as valueless.
bestbooties:
To my way of thinking, this [zb] is as bad as the politician caught taking drugs with prostitutes on taxpayer’s money, seems most [zb] with more money than sense have no morals whatsoever!
It’s not really a question of morals.There’s something scary about an obvious mental health flaw in a sadistic mindset which likes killing things for fun.Which in this case goes even further in the form of using a crossbow/bow and arrows to obviously cause even more unnecessary suffering to the animal by seriously wounding it instead of at least just shooting it in the head with a hunting rifle.
Apparently after arrowing him they then had to hound him for the next 40 hours to finally shoot him behead and skin.
Would love to know how many of those who find (like me) what this pen is did
morally repugnant have no problem with the global Holocaust that is the abortion of millions of unwanted human children.
There’s no real connection.IE that issue is simply one of morals ( life begins at conception not birth and the right to life of the unborn child ).
As opposed to in this case the mental health issue of ■■■■■■ and killing for fun.When,as can often be seen in Southern Europe,the two things can be mixed on the basis of double standards regards human life v animal which is seen as valueless.
That was my point, some of those outraged at an animal being needlessly killed will have no objection to abortions.
Bach home:
Apparently after arrowing him they then had to hound him for the next 40 hours to finally shoot him behead and skin.
Would love to know how many of those who find (like me) what this pen is did
morally repugnant have no problem with the global Holocaust that is the abortion of millions of unwanted human children.
There’s no real connection.IE that issue is simply one of morals ( life begins at conception not birth and the right to life of the unborn child ).
As opposed to in this case the mental health issue of ■■■■■■ and killing for fun.When,as can often be seen in Southern Europe,the two things can be mixed on the basis of double standards regards human life v animal which is seen as valueless.
That was my point, some of those outraged at an animal being needlessly killed will have no objection to abortions.
As I said there is no real connection being that the anti v pro abortion issue is all about a moral stance as to when life begins.Unfortunately many women get taken in by all the feminist pro abortion bs and only realise it when it’s too late and are then left with a lifetime of guilt and regret.
Whereas the idea of killing,let alone causing unnecessary suffering to,an animal for fun and pleasure is an unarguable mental health issue.IE this nutter really needs to be asking himself some questions as to why he is doing what he is doing and hopefully stop it from now on for his own sanity.
People are raging about the lion being killed because they see it as WRONG (ie there was no GOOD reason for him to kill that animal)and when they talk about an act being wrong they are making a moral judgment.
The uproar (no pun intended lol) is not about the state of the man’s mental health, if it was about his mental health then what use is wanting him to “ask himself some questions…”? You say that when you call some one to self examine themselves in a moral sense!
So they are both moral acts clearly and the same person being against one act on moral grounds but have no moral objection to a greater wrong are hypocrites.
Bach home:
People are raging about the lion being killed because they see it as WRONG (ie there was no GOOD reason for him to kill that animal)and when they talk about an act being wrong they are making a moral judgment.
The uproar (no pun intended lol) is not about the state of the man’s mental health, if it was about his mental health then what use is wanting him to “ask himself some questions…”? You say that when you call some one to self examine themselves in a moral sense!
So they are both moral acts clearly and the same person being against one act on moral grounds but have no moral objection to a greater wrong are hypocrites.
The difference that marks it as a mental issue would be along the same lines as if it had been a park warden having to deal with a problem animal or some one working in a slaughter house.Assuming that either decided to kill something outside of the normally expected parameters of their job and/or stab/torture an animal to death in a way which caused it maximum agony and got pleasure from same ‘that’ is a mental health issue.
As opposed to the woman raised and educated in a pro abortion environment and who then ‘aborts’ her unborn child on the basis of that ‘education’.Then has to live a life of guilt an regret when she realises the contradiction between the pro abortionist idea of life begins at birth,as opposed to nature which says it begins at conception.Which explains why in one hospital room a woman can be grieving for her miscarried child while another is entering a different room with the intention of ending her child’s life.‘That’ is a question of morals and the hypocrisy of the pro arbortion agenda.
Which then leaves the question of the type of person who has the morals to recognise that life begins at conception but who is also happy to torture an animal to death in the bull ring.IE good morals but a sadistic mental flaw.
Trust betty king to come along and say something really ■■■■■■■ stupid. As if it wasn’t bad enough with carryfast and bach home going off at a tangent.
peterm:
As if it wasn’t bad enough with carryfast and bach home going off at a tangent.
I think it’s fair enough to say that anyone who takes sadistic pleasure in killing and hurting animals is a full on fruit and nutcase who needs mental re habilitation.
Just to clarify matters. I hate these pricks that go out killing animals for what they call sport with a passion. It’s not just poor old Cecil, it’s all the other wild animals that get slaughtered for fun by the ■■■■■■■■ like this dentist, not to mention the pair (and anyone else) that help them do it.
peterm:
Trust betty king to come along and say something really [zb] stupid. As if it wasn’t bad enough with carryfast and bach home going off at a tangent.
No doubt another “military hero”
Cant put what I would really like to say but there ya go.
Have a nice day.
